Jump to content

Baba Deep Singh Ji ( Sees On Hand )


Recommended Posts

It is difficult to believe if looking at the situation from a wholly logical and scientific viewpoint.

BUT it boils down to that fact that if you believe in Waheguru and his grace, then Baba Deep Singh Ji's feat was par for the course for a Gursikh such as him. I don't see why anyone would manufacture this "legend" in order to mislead people if that's what the doubters are trying to imply. The fact that these kind of events don't happen these days (or out in the open for all to see like the old times) is probably because many of us simply don't have that shardaa and utter belief in God.

But like I said, I do understand why the cynics are asking these questions and I guess they have a right to air their opinions. It gives us something to discuss! :smile2:

what does this has to do with sharda ? I am not saying it happened or not . I have not seen it happen , so I am silent on this topic !

<< I don't see why anyone would manufacture this "legend" in order to mislead people if that's what the doubters are trying to imply >>

But you can see ample proofs that brain ( head ) dies as soon as a person is decapitated because of the drop in blood pressure to brain . Also , person's brain instantly ( in maximum of 10 seconds , if not instantly ! ) goes unconscious when a person is decapitated ... Body twiches as a person gets decapitated . Fighting is scientifically and medically impossible in this scenario !

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Have people changed Kaljugi? Were people that have come before us "better" people? I think what I've just written probably belongs in another topic.

I think we have changed. Some might construe this change as people being naive and more innocent during those times etc. Others might say we've gained more worldly knowledge whilst losing our spirituality and faith. Its difficult to say to be honest. I'm sure there were cynics and mischievous folk in those days too (BTW I'm not saying a cynic can be compared to a mischief maker) - We only have to look at the example of those many fake Gurus springing up as soon as Guru Harkrishan Sahib Ji passed away and declared that the next Guru would be in Baba Bakala. Its much like these modern times where we've got people saying "I'm the reincarnation of Guru Ji" or "I'm an incarnation of God", etc.

What I am certain about is that there were a greater number of Sikhs in those days (compared to today) who had high avastha. Their belief was unwavering and their determination to do right by Sikhi was unshakable. I guess that's what I meant by there being better people in those times.

EDIT: I'm certainly not naive enough to suggest that those days were comparable to some type of utopia or something similar. I've heard a few stories about the things that use to occur in the general population during the times of our Gurus (in terms of household issues, husband / wife problems, etc) that wouldn't feel out of place in this modern world.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I agree with you when you say people were more naive and innocent etc. For example they didn't have all this media coverage, techonology, t.v. series etc and had a much more simpler living. We're talking about hundreds of years ago, you could even just talk about 50 years ago, things were definetly much more simpler.

Will probably get worse if this pattern continues and even fewer Gurmukhs will be about.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Then I guess its up to Sikhs to ensure that we don't consider the advent of technology and media as a threat to our beliefs. It makes us look weak and it implies we don't really have faith in the glory of Waheguru, because something as basic as a few advances in science (and an increase in societal awareness / knowledge) seems to threaten the Almighty who we love telling everyone has no limits and is unfathomable. You only have to look at the decline in mainstream Christianity in the UK to see how we must evolve with the times but not compromise our beliefs. Its a difficult balancing act for sure.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
 Share


  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • yeh it's true, we shouldn't be lazy and need to learn jhatka shikaar. It doesn't help some of grew up in surrounding areas like Slough and Southall where everyone thought it was super bad for amrit dharis to eat meat, and they were following Sant babas and jathas, and instead the Singhs should have been normalising jhatka just like the recent world war soldiers did. We are trying to rectifiy this and khalsa should learn jhatka.  But I am just writing about bhog for those that are still learning rehit. As I explained, there are all these negative influences in the panth that talk against rehit, but this shouldn't deter us from taking khanda pahul, no matter what level of rehit we are!
    • How is it going to help? The link is of a Sikh hunter. Fine, but what good does that do the lazy Sikh who ate khulla maas in a restaurant? By the way, for the OP, yes, it's against rehit to eat khulla maas.
    • Yeah, Sikhs should do bhog of food they eat. But the point of bhog is to only do bhog of food which is fit to be presented to Maharaj. It's not maryada to do bhog of khulla maas and pretend it's OK to eat. It's not. Come on, bro, you should know better than to bring this Sakhi into it. Is this Sikh in the restaurant accompanied by Guru Gobind Singh ji? Is he fighting a dharam yudh? Or is he merely filling his belly with the nearest restaurant?  Please don't make a mockery of our puratan Singhs' sacrifices by comparing them to lazy Sikhs who eat khulla maas.
    • Seriously?? The Dhadi is trying to be cute. For those who didn't get it, he said: "Some say Maharaj killed bakras (goats). Some say he cut the heads of the Panj Piyaras. The truth is that they weren't goats. It was she-goats (ਬਕਰੀਆਂ). He jhatka'd she-goats. Not he-goats." Wow. This is possibly the stupidest thing I've ever heard in relation to Sikhi.
    • Instead of a 9 inch or larger kirpan, take a smaller kirpan and put it (without gatra) inside your smaller turban and tie the turban tightly. This keeps a kirpan on your person without interfering with the massage or alarming the masseuse. I'm not talking about a trinket but rather an actual small kirpan that fits in a sheath (you'll have to search to find one). As for ahem, "problems", you could get a male masseuse. I don't know where you are, but in most places there are professional masseuses who actually know what they are doing and can really relieve your muscle pains.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use