A renowned lecturer and researcher in child development and abuse once told me that pedos frequently and consciously work themselves into positions of authority and trust to access people. I think they congregate and protect each other from such places. I think subtly exhibiting the deviant behaviour (or an indifference to it) lets the powerful ones recognise the upcoming ones, which they then fast track. It explains a lot. I think they recognise each other in various subtle ways.
There is something about 'pristine looks' with many gay men. Their grooming and dress sense often seems to be strangely impeccable and symmetrical. They are perfectionists with it. But saying that, there are some rough and ready as hell Panjabi bis/gays(?) who don't have that preening thing going on. Same with some working class goray gays.
It's weird how some are camp and some aren't remotely. With the camp ones, what's up with the walk and high pitched voice? Is it some biological thing? All that strutting and mincing. And the exaggerated gesticulation?
I think GurjantGnostic seems obsessed with me. Never mind.
I think that KA is the more well known charity and gets the most publicity.
If he focuses on Non Sikhs then the more publicity he gets.
The bigger these charities get, the less they actually help the people they claim to be helping.
It becomes more about sustaining the people that work for the charity (they are also tax free)
I have seen Oxfam's swanky head office and it makes you question their motives.
The question for us is to focus on charities that are smaller, Sikhi focus (they may get less publicity as it only deals with Sikhs) where they can be transparent, accountable and where our donations can show that it is adds value to the people who they proclaim need it and not the people who work for it.