Jump to content

Well Done Sangat Tv Again...


GurpsSinghAujla
 Share

Recommended Posts

Mr aujla this thread needs to be closed down as it has backfired on you tactics and made you look very foolish. It's very cheesy (strong cheddar cheesy) that you have come on here to promote that you intact helped a guy who cost the average sikh thousands of pounds. Thaker travels is the only one who has been selling these cheap tickets because other professional agents did not trust the flight as thaker only cares about money he didn't care.

If your blind mom was in the flight you would know the pain. Yes it's not entirely his fault but he was responsible for the purchase of tickets therefore accountable for it's problems.

As for sangat tv, I'm pretty sure that one of your trustees was on the actual flight as sikh channel captured him coming of the flight with the other passengers, and we are not blind we did see that sikh channel did report it first and that's what counts according to your riots reporting fiasco a few months back. I hope sikh vision tv will put death to this pointless and political channel but it won't because of Indian government congressi backing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Lol.k. Im obsessed with Mr thakar, he is my hero, and sangat tv is "my" channel and it wasn't "one of my trustees on the flight, i AM that trustee!! Will that explanation suffice?

Now carry on and close the thread if you wish. And just for the record, im not asking for this to happen because it "backfired" on me lol....(where your paranoia comes up i have no idea!), i gave my opinion and said how i felt. I don't really understand what backfired. i asked for the thread to be closed because of the outrageous post by the one member, which i stil feel is totally out of order. It can stay on if they don't feel the need to close it, I've got no problem with my opinion being left on here!

Finally, in regards to the ticket agent issue....you're actually wrong. There were two other independent agents who had sold tickets too. also, although i wish this doesn't happen, i doubt that this airline will last even a few more months. what'll really be funny then is tethat people will say one ticket agent closed down an airline. smarter people will see the reality.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Gurs SinghAhuja - Did you saw the programme yesterday on SikhChannel at 07:00 PM "Uncensored" with Dr. Aaulakh? These sort of talks with such a senior personaility gives a moral boosting to the whole Kaum and keeps the cycle of thought/vibrations of Khalistan running continously in the thought process - and YES this happened yesterday 18th Nov., well after the Ofcom isssue.

Has Sangat TV got frieghtened on SikhChannel receiving Ofcom notice? Khalsa Jee - "Pehlaan Maran Kabool, Jeevan Kee Chad Aas". The attitude should be "Band hunda channel ho jaaye, we will discuss our core issues", and I think SikhChannel is continuing on that path, ofcourse other issues are also important. Yes, there will be flaws even in SikhChannel way of working and nobody is perfect.

Did Sangat TV discussed in any LIVE panel or w/o a LIVE panel June and November 1984 Genocide by Indian Government this year?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The problem you have is that the smarter people are seeing the reality, reality is that two policeman guarded the front door of takhar travels, why not other agents that's reality.

Reality again is that sikh channel reported the incident first and viewed the opinions of the people involved what's wrong with this it's showing the reality of what people are saying and feeling.

Paranoia is why an agent or trustee of sangat tv is on sikhsangat trying to muster up support for this pointless channel because in reality you know you are decades behind sikhchannel and you just want find out about your status with the masses, that's paranoia.

The problem you have is that the smarter people are seeing the reality, reality is that two policeman guarded the front door of takhar travels, why not other agents that's reality.

Reality again is that sikh channel reported the incident first and viewed the opinions of the people involved what's wrong with this it's showing the reality of what people are saying and feeling.

Paranoia is why an agent or trustee of sangat tv is on sikhsangat trying to muster up support for this pointless channel because in reality you know you are decades behind sikhchannel and you just want find out about your status with the masses, that's paranoia.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The problem you have is that the smarter people are seeing the reality, reality is that two policeman guarded the front door of takhar travels, why not other agents that's reality.

Reality again is that sikh channel reported the incident first and viewed the opinions of the people involved what's wrong with this it's showing the reality of what people are saying and feeling.

Paranoia is why an agent or trustee of sangat tv is on sikhsangat trying to muster up support for this pointless channel because in reality you know you are decades behind sikhchannel and you just want find out about your status with the masses, that's paranoia.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Vaheguru Ji Ka Khalsa Vaheguru Ji Ki Fateh

Why do you feel my post is so outrages? Because its the truth? Unfortunately the truth hurts... If you think anything I said was a lie then please do let me know and I will provide you with evidence to back it up. Yes I could have replied in a more less direct way, however if I did that the message may have been misunderstood.

As to answer your question I'm from UK not USA... I have watched and even worked for the channel, as I have with other channels.

There is one thing in our culture we tend to do, we don't let others voice there opinions. We think we should keep praising and never let anyone know of the 'dark side'. This is very wrong, this is the reason why nothing ever gets solved. If we don't voice our opinions then how will they improve? Now instead of taking what I have said as a personal insult, as thats what it looks like you have done, the channel in question here could read it and try to improve themselves and prove me wrong. Its called freedom of speech. Its there for a reason. This is why alot of comities and organisations are so corrupt, because every time someone speaks against them they are hushed and made out to be the 'baddy' for speaking the truth.

The fact of the matter is that Sangat TV is what I said it is in my previous post.

I would like to add that there is a difference between freedom of speech and slandering people on a personal level, and some of you are starting to slander each other which is not acceptable. To the guy who is bigging up Sikh Channel loads, yes they are doing good at this moment of time, but there was a time when they were not liked by many aswell... instead of doing a direct attack to someone else, stick to topic, if you wanto say something about either channel then say it, but dont slander other people, because that just makes you look foolish. Also don't post random rumers unless you have evidence. Saying stuff like Indian congress backed channel is pointless due to the fact of there being no evidence. Even if it is, you cant make out it is with no evidence as it just sounds silly. All the stuff I said can be backed up.

Vaheguru Ji Ka Khalsa Vaheguru Ji Ki Fateh

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm not giving loads I'm defending what is a direct attack on sikh channel, right or wrong ?

Slander is false claims but what I say is well known maybe not on paper but nevertheless well agreed.

If you can have freedom of speech let me have mine.

And frankly I don't care if you finds what I say silly tu mera jaj lagaa ?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
 Share


  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • yeh it's true, we shouldn't be lazy and need to learn jhatka shikaar. It doesn't help some of grew up in surrounding areas like Slough and Southall where everyone thought it was super bad for amrit dharis to eat meat, and they were following Sant babas and jathas, and instead the Singhs should have been normalising jhatka just like the recent world war soldiers did. We are trying to rectifiy this and khalsa should learn jhatka.  But I am just writing about bhog for those that are still learning rehit. As I explained, there are all these negative influences in the panth that talk against rehit, but this shouldn't deter us from taking khanda pahul, no matter what level of rehit we are!
    • How is it going to help? The link is of a Sikh hunter. Fine, but what good does that do the lazy Sikh who ate khulla maas in a restaurant? By the way, for the OP, yes, it's against rehit to eat khulla maas.
    • Yeah, Sikhs should do bhog of food they eat. But the point of bhog is to only do bhog of food which is fit to be presented to Maharaj. It's not maryada to do bhog of khulla maas and pretend it's OK to eat. It's not. Come on, bro, you should know better than to bring this Sakhi into it. Is this Sikh in the restaurant accompanied by Guru Gobind Singh ji? Is he fighting a dharam yudh? Or is he merely filling his belly with the nearest restaurant?  Please don't make a mockery of our puratan Singhs' sacrifices by comparing them to lazy Sikhs who eat khulla maas.
    • Seriously?? The Dhadi is trying to be cute. For those who didn't get it, he said: "Some say Maharaj killed bakras (goats). Some say he cut the heads of the Panj Piyaras. The truth is that they weren't goats. It was she-goats (ਬਕਰੀਆਂ). He jhatka'd she-goats. Not he-goats." Wow. This is possibly the stupidest thing I've ever heard in relation to Sikhi.
    • Instead of a 9 inch or larger kirpan, take a smaller kirpan and put it (without gatra) inside your smaller turban and tie the turban tightly. This keeps a kirpan on your person without interfering with the massage or alarming the masseuse. I'm not talking about a trinket but rather an actual small kirpan that fits in a sheath (you'll have to search to find one). As for ahem, "problems", you could get a male masseuse. I don't know where you are, but in most places there are professional masseuses who actually know what they are doing and can really relieve your muscle pains.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use