Jump to content

Recommended Posts

The problem you have is that the smarter people are seeing the reality, reality is that two policeman guarded the front door of takhar travels, why not other agents that's reality.

Reality again is that sikh channel reported the incident first and viewed the opinions of the people involved what's wrong with this it's showing the reality of what people are saying and feeling.

Paranoia is why an agent or trustee of sangat tv is on sikhsangat trying to muster up support for this pointless channel because in reality you know you are decades behind sikhchannel and you just want find out about your status with the masses, that's paranoia.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Vaheguru Ji Ka Khalsa Vaheguru Ji Ki Fateh

Why do you feel my post is so outrages? Because its the truth? Unfortunately the truth hurts... If you think anything I said was a lie then please do let me know and I will provide you with evidence to back it up. Yes I could have replied in a more less direct way, however if I did that the message may have been misunderstood.

As to answer your question I'm from UK not USA... I have watched and even worked for the channel, as I have with other channels.

There is one thing in our culture we tend to do, we don't let others voice there opinions. We think we should keep praising and never let anyone know of the 'dark side'. This is very wrong, this is the reason why nothing ever gets solved. If we don't voice our opinions then how will they improve? Now instead of taking what I have said as a personal insult, as thats what it looks like you have done, the channel in question here could read it and try to improve themselves and prove me wrong. Its called freedom of speech. Its there for a reason. This is why alot of comities and organisations are so corrupt, because every time someone speaks against them they are hushed and made out to be the 'baddy' for speaking the truth.

The fact of the matter is that Sangat TV is what I said it is in my previous post.

I would like to add that there is a difference between freedom of speech and slandering people on a personal level, and some of you are starting to slander each other which is not acceptable. To the guy who is bigging up Sikh Channel loads, yes they are doing good at this moment of time, but there was a time when they were not liked by many aswell... instead of doing a direct attack to someone else, stick to topic, if you wanto say something about either channel then say it, but dont slander other people, because that just makes you look foolish. Also don't post random rumers unless you have evidence. Saying stuff like Indian congress backed channel is pointless due to the fact of there being no evidence. Even if it is, you cant make out it is with no evidence as it just sounds silly. All the stuff I said can be backed up.

Vaheguru Ji Ka Khalsa Vaheguru Ji Ki Fateh

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm not giving loads I'm defending what is a direct attack on sikh channel, right or wrong ?

Slander is false claims but what I say is well known maybe not on paper but nevertheless well agreed.

If you can have freedom of speech let me have mine.

And frankly I don't care if you finds what I say silly tu mera jaj lagaa ?

Link to post
Share on other sites
Gurs SinghAhuja - Did you saw the programme yesterday on SikhChannel at 07:00 PM "Uncensored" with Dr. Aaulakh?

Dr. Gurmit Singh Aulakh of long dead Khalistan council based out of east coast? That guy lost his senses long time ago. Nobody here listens to this heavy drinker anymore. Such ppl who lost their mind destroy the reputation of Khalsa movement.

What's going on with uk Sikhs? They are 20 yrs ahead of Sikhs in USA but suddenly now they are getting interested in most controversial sikh personalities of amreeka?

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Dr. Gurmit Singh Aulakh of long dead Khalistan council based out of east coast? That guy lost his senses long time ago. Nobody here listens to this heavy drinker anymore. Such ppl who lost their mind destroy the reputation of Khalsa movement.

What's going on with uk Sikhs? They are 20 yrs ahead of Sikhs in USA but suddenly now they are getting interested in most controversial sikh personalities of amreeka?

Ok, Thanks for this information. I wasn't aware of all this. I just found the programme interesting and his views and whatever speeches he had in Nankana Sahib quite interesting and encouraging.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Both channels have spread the message of Sikhi, through Gurbani, Kirtan, Katha, and Gurmantar.

However, as far as the Single most biggest unresolved issue for Sikhs is concerned, 1984 and the problems in Punjab, both Channels have not been able to carry out what is required to bring Success.

There are many, many clear Vidoes of Maahpurkh Brhamgyani Sant Jaranail Singh Ji Khalsa Bhindranwale, and the Mahaan Shaheeds who stood for truth in the face of oppression and injustice until the very end! If both channels starting playing these vidoes and tapes (maybe with relevant photos) everything would fix itself.

For two Sikh Channels not to be playing the vidoes and tapes of the Greatest Sikh the world has produced in the last 100 years seems really odd to me.

I know Sangat tv played some videos of Sant Ji on a Sunday a while back. Both Channels should be airing Sant Ji's Videos.

Why not bring the best the Sikhs have had to offer for well over a hundred years, Sant Ji, to the World?

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Not just North Punjabi/Mirpuri Pakistani types in the UK, presumably the below article refers mainly to white males   Samaritans volunteers met vulnerable callers for sex https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-58057031 By Jennifer Meierhans BBC News Published 50 minutes ago Share IMAGE SOURCEGETTY IMAGES Samaritans says it has introduced new safeguarding measures after volunteers met vulnerable callers for sex. The charity, which offers a helpline to people in distress, will reportedly monitor calls in future to prevent inappropriate relationships. The Telegraph found incidents of middle-aged men using their position to meet up with female callers for sex. The charity told the BBC it did not dispute that a "very small number of safeguarding incidents" had occurred. Samaritans chief executive Julie Bentley said the "extremely rare" incidents had been identified and that swift and appropriate action had been taken. According to the Telegraph, a memo to volunteers said 44 serious incidents had occurred since 2017. Ms Bentley said Samaritans' 20,000 volunteers provided vital emotional support to anyone who is struggling, 24 hours a day, 365 days a year. Volunteers on the charity's telephone service have answered more than 13 million calls in the four years from January 2017, she said. 'Robust investigation' "Running any national service on this scale means that, on extremely rare occasions, high standards are not always met and from the millions of calls answered, a very small number of safeguarding incidents were identified," said Ms Bentley. "Our robust investigation procedures meant these incidents were handled swiftly and appropriate action taken. "Any safeguarding matter is one too many and as such we review our practices on an ongoing basis and have introduced further measures as part of our commitment to delivering a consistently high-quality experience for our callers." Incidents are investigated by the charity's Serious Safeguarding Panel and are reported to the Charity Commission, Samaritans said.
    • I think this type of attitude helps keep Panjab economically backwards.  
    • This history seems true. It's not a new discovery, and this Zorowar Singh palit has a history and legacy in Bassi Pathaan that people there still acknowledge.  Info has been out about Zorowar Singh Palit since the late 60s at least, when Ganda Singh put out Sri Gursobha. That people here haven't heard of him here says more about their own piss poor study of history than anything else.  Plus this figure being from a tarkhan background would have motivated the usual jut casteists to jealously try and bury his memory, so that probably played a big part in his occlusion and hence so much ignorance about him. I'm not too familiar with Uhdoke, what makes you say the above about him?    
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use