Jump to content

Hindus Burn Quran


SikhSpectrum
 Share

Recommended Posts

Read Ambedkar history books on ambedkar.org, Even Nehru accepted all the dark side of Indian History in "Glimpses of Indian History". I forgot a name - "MihirKula".

If you have time to read, go to the link ambedkar.org, then follow left hand side Dr. B.R. Ambedkar -> On-Line Books -> "Decline And Fall of Buddhism" (Right Hand side).

There is also a book covering "Tirupathi Balaji which was a Buddhist shrine".

I don't think there is any reason for this history to be in Western mainstream books, the Indian main stream historians don't want this history to be taught out even to Indians :), so it's not covered even in Indian CBSE/NCERT courses.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Most Hindus are peaceful, kind people.

I believe your definiion of the word "Hindu" is not as per Indian Constitution. Under Indian Constitution, everybody except Muslim/Christian/Parsi is a Hindu whether he is Sikh/Budhdhist/Jainism or anybody else. Just ask a Bengali if he/she is a Hindu and just see the reaction! For more clarification, read this - http://superhindus.wordpress.com/hindutva-nothing-but-brahminic-sanathana-dharma/

Link to comment
Share on other sites

@ JasSinghKhalsa

Very good articles but it's not 100 % evidence this is what happened, it's someone’s opinion. There are so many Sikh historians who have written a different account to Sikh history that main stream Sikhs do not agree with. For e.g. Badha Bahdhur, some Sikhs believe he never took amrit and should not be call Badha Singh Bahadur. There are accounts of Bandha Bahadhur killing thousands of innocent Muslims but in the main stream we believe this is not true. Everything is not black and white specially history some accounts are very bias, we as the reader should take that into consideration.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

@ JasSinghKhalsa

Very good articles but it's not 100 % evidence this is what happened, it's someone’s opinion. There are so many Sikh historians who have written a different account to Sikh history that main stream Sikhs do not agree with. For e.g. Badha Bahdhur, some Sikhs believe he never took amrit and should not be call Badha Singh Bahadur. There are accounts of Bandha Bahadhur killing thousands of innocent Muslims but in the main stream we believe this is not true. Everything is not black and white specially history some accounts are very bias, we as the reader should take that into consideration.

ok then you have a point...but would you to like tell us what happened to the bhuddists of india?...because frankly i dont believe the story the hindus float around that they basically converted back to hinduism en masse...that just isnt believable....there had to be some mass killing involved....how could a very large bhuddist population just disappear like that?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

@ JasSinghKhalsa

Very good articles but it's not 100 % evidence this is what happened, it's someone’s opinion.

1000 years later there won't be any evidence on 1984, 1992, 2002. Please read the on line books on Ambedkar.org, they are not articles, those books contain real concrete evidences, and the books are written by some very senior historians.

And I just don't refer to Ambedkar's and his disciples history, the history written by Fa-Hein and Huein-Tseng (Chinese travellers) can be mapped to see what is true or lie ...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1000 years later there won't be any evidence on 1984, 1992, 2002. Please read the on line books on Ambedkar.org, they are not articles, those books contain real concrete evidences, and the books are written by some very senior historians.

And I just don't refer to Ambedkar's and his disciples history, the history written by Fa-Hein and Huein-Tseng (Chinese travellers) can be mapped to see what is true or lie ...

I have no such doubt about authenticity behind the accounts written by the historians but you as a person reading these accounts would have to take into consideration the other side of the story. A coin has two sides each side tells a different story. Hindus believe Mahatma Buddh was incarnation of Vishnu (in Hindu mythology Vishnu stands for the ultimate truth), by going on this fact alone that I have just mentioned these Historians are not completely 100% true because who would want to destroy their own messiah. OK, lets go back to second world war, there are many historical accounts that praise Hitler and his regime and there are many Historical accounts that praise the British & it's Allies and destroying of the Nazi regime. Either of the two historical accounts are not going to 100% accurate but by reading them both, as an individual you can have an opinion but by saying this is 100% true, it never will be unless you witnessed it yourself.

Please do not get offended by what I say and question me further with something you don’t agree with , this is a discussion forum.

Guru fathey

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
 Share


  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • yeh it's true, we shouldn't be lazy and need to learn jhatka shikaar. It doesn't help some of grew up in surrounding areas like Slough and Southall where everyone thought it was super bad for amrit dharis to eat meat, and they were following Sant babas and jathas, and instead the Singhs should have been normalising jhatka just like the recent world war soldiers did. We are trying to rectifiy this and khalsa should learn jhatka.  But I am just writing about bhog for those that are still learning rehit. As I explained, there are all these negative influences in the panth that talk against rehit, but this shouldn't deter us from taking khanda pahul, no matter what level of rehit we are!
    • How is it going to help? The link is of a Sikh hunter. Fine, but what good does that do the lazy Sikh who ate khulla maas in a restaurant? By the way, for the OP, yes, it's against rehit to eat khulla maas.
    • Yeah, Sikhs should do bhog of food they eat. But the point of bhog is to only do bhog of food which is fit to be presented to Maharaj. It's not maryada to do bhog of khulla maas and pretend it's OK to eat. It's not. Come on, bro, you should know better than to bring this Sakhi into it. Is this Sikh in the restaurant accompanied by Guru Gobind Singh ji? Is he fighting a dharam yudh? Or is he merely filling his belly with the nearest restaurant?  Please don't make a mockery of our puratan Singhs' sacrifices by comparing them to lazy Sikhs who eat khulla maas.
    • Seriously?? The Dhadi is trying to be cute. For those who didn't get it, he said: "Some say Maharaj killed bakras (goats). Some say he cut the heads of the Panj Piyaras. The truth is that they weren't goats. It was she-goats (ਬਕਰੀਆਂ). He jhatka'd she-goats. Not he-goats." Wow. This is possibly the stupidest thing I've ever heard in relation to Sikhi.
    • Instead of a 9 inch or larger kirpan, take a smaller kirpan and put it (without gatra) inside your smaller turban and tie the turban tightly. This keeps a kirpan on your person without interfering with the massage or alarming the masseuse. I'm not talking about a trinket but rather an actual small kirpan that fits in a sheath (you'll have to search to find one). As for ahem, "problems", you could get a male masseuse. I don't know where you are, but in most places there are professional masseuses who actually know what they are doing and can really relieve your muscle pains.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use