Jump to content

California Singhs, Please Question This Gurdwara


TuhadaDaas
 Share

Recommended Posts

Absolute disgrace,

the so called gianis sing ham ghar sajan ayae at his arrival, what a joke.

Such an ardas or ceremony will NEVER be parvaan.

I am posting this not for a slagging match, but to put this to the attention of our Californian veers to get these 'Gyanis' and whatever Gurdwara they come from to answer why it carried out such a ceremony.

*So called Sikh marrying a Muslim in so called Anand Karaj*

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The objection Sikhs should have here is that Sikh kirtanis and Gianis performed a marriage in which a Sikh is married to a non Sikh. As per Sikh rehet maryadha a Sikh anand karaj can only be between Sikhs. A Sikh girl cannot marry a Muslim, Christian, Hindu, Buddhist. Originally during the Gurdwara reform movement, the Anand Karaj could only be performed if both the boy and girl had taken Amrit. But it seems over the generations due to weaknesses we have allowed not only non Amritdhari Sikhs to have Anand Karaj but even non Sikhs to be included. That is why allowing one Dhil(weakness) is like a domino effect. One Dhil in rehet will lead to more dhils.

Singho, With so much weakness in rehet in our Panth right now, why aren't we alarmed yet? We need Parchar more than ever to strengthen our Sikh institutions back to the standard of Guru Jee's time. Without that we are all lost. And our decline is just going to continue if we do not do anything about it. Parchar! Parchar! Parchar! should be ringing in our minds like an alarm bell.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The objection Sikhs should have here is that Sikh kirtanis and Gianis performed a marriage in which a Sikh is married to a non Sikh. As per Sikh rehet maryadha a Sikh anand karaj can only be between Sikhs. A Sikh girl cannot marry a Muslim, Christian, Hindu, Buddhist. Originally during the Gurdwara reform movement, the Anand Karaj could only be performed if both the boy and girl had taken Amrit. But it seems over the generations due to weaknesses we have allowed not only non Amritdhari Sikhs to have Anand Karaj but even non Sikhs to be included. That is why allowing one Dhil(weakness) is like a domino effect. One Dhil in rehet will lead to more dhils.

Singho, With so much weakness in rehet in our Panth right now, why aren't we alarmed yet? We need Parchar more than ever to strengthen our Sikh institutions back to the standard of Guru Jee's time. Without that we are all lost. And our decline is just going to continue if we do not do anything about it. Parchar! Parchar! Parchar! should be ringing in our minds like an alarm bell.

Why can't Sikh girls marry non-Sikhs? And can Sikh boys only marry Sikhs?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
 Share

  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • yeh it's true, we shouldn't be lazy and need to learn jhatka shikaar. It doesn't help some of grew up in surrounding areas like Slough and Southall where everyone thought it was super bad for amrit dharis to eat meat, and they were following Sant babas and jathas, and instead the Singhs should have been normalising jhatka just like the recent world war soldiers did. We are trying to rectifiy this and khalsa should learn jhatka.  But I am just writing about bhog for those that are still learning rehit. As I explained, there are all these negative influences in the panth that talk against rehit, but this shouldn't deter us from taking khanda pahul, no matter what level of rehit we are!
    • How is it going to help? The link is of a Sikh hunter. Fine, but what good does that do the lazy Sikh who ate khulla maas in a restaurant? By the way, for the OP, yes, it's against rehit to eat khulla maas.
    • Yeah, Sikhs should do bhog of food they eat. But the point of bhog is to only do bhog of food which is fit to be presented to Maharaj. It's not maryada to do bhog of khulla maas and pretend it's OK to eat. It's not. Come on, bro, you should know better than to bring this Sakhi into it. Is this Sikh in the restaurant accompanied by Guru Gobind Singh ji? Is he fighting a dharam yudh? Or is he merely filling his belly with the nearest restaurant?  Please don't make a mockery of our puratan Singhs' sacrifices by comparing them to lazy Sikhs who eat khulla maas.
    • Seriously?? The Dhadi is trying to be cute. For those who didn't get it, he said: "Some say Maharaj killed bakras (goats). Some say he cut the heads of the Panj Piyaras. The truth is that they weren't goats. It was she-goats (ਬਕਰੀਆਂ). He jhatka'd she-goats. Not he-goats." Wow. This is possibly the stupidest thing I've ever heard in relation to Sikhi.
    • Instead of a 9 inch or larger kirpan, take a smaller kirpan and put it (without gatra) inside your smaller turban and tie the turban tightly. This keeps a kirpan on your person without interfering with the massage or alarming the masseuse. I'm not talking about a trinket but rather an actual small kirpan that fits in a sheath (you'll have to search to find one). As for ahem, "problems", you could get a male masseuse. I don't know where you are, but in most places there are professional masseuses who actually know what they are doing and can really relieve your muscle pains.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use