Jump to content

Gagandip Singh Trial Verdict


SinghWarrior
 Share

Recommended Posts

Theres thousands of Sikhs who are following this case with interest but we do not go to the public gallery to view this case what made you go?

That's their choice. Not that I feel any need to justify it to you but as a law student I'll go into whichever public gallery I like, thank you.

you are truly as your name suggests 'ConfusedAndFloating'

Original! I regret this name choice ;)

If your brother or father was murdered in similar circumstances and someone like you went around spreading rumours that he raped other women and he was a rapist. I doubt you would be well pleased with that person

Indeed. However, it's not rumours I'm spreading.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I knew someone would ignore everything else I've said and jump to accuse me of that! It seems very difficult for people here to accept the truth or maintain any sort of sound argument. But no, my friend, I don't know Mundill or either of the other two men. Anyone is able to sit in the public gallery of a court room.

Lol! Evidentily that's just the thing you've shown yourself to be incapable of doing.

So you think its justice what mundil got done just for GBH ? are you for real? Read the dailymail comments page and see the amount of white british people who disagree with this verdict too. You seem to have some twisted sick agenda of defaming gagandips memory without hard cold facts.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Gagandip's barrister, Aftab Jafferjee QC states:

"It is common ground in this case that he tried to have sex with her, by getting into her bed. Both she and he were to describe it as an attempted rape"

http://www.telegraph...mpted-rape.html

Why would your own lawyer, claim that you attempted to rape somebody? With lawyers like that, who needs enemies one may ask.

The same lawyer went on to say "Gagandip had his share of faults. There is no doubt about it. He may have deserved some punishment".

http://www.bbc.co.uk...london-16924774

Aftab Jafferjee QC to this day remains unchallenged by Gagandip's family. The lawyer appointed by Gagandip's family has unequivocally stated that Gagandip attempted to rape Mundill. I don't have access to documents that he did. Neither do you. But with lawyers like that in your prosecution team, the defence legal team need not bother turning up for work.

As I have stated earlier, as far as I'm concerned, this was premeditated murder led by a manipulative lady who should have been given the longest sentence of all of them. All three should have been convicted of murder.

Both sides were at fault. But as Gagandip's lawyer said himself, attempted rape it was indeed.

My friend, people seem to be ignoring the evidence that's actually put fourth and instead continuing with baseless arguments.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hows that random is not a murder?

This is a forum i can say what i want.

Sorry if i offended you.

You didn't offend me, don't worry dear. Surely my opinion in regards to murder is irrelevant to the actual argument, but I appreciate your attempt to steer the subject in a different direction. No, I personally don't condone murder, nor do I condone rape. I'd ask you what you think of rape, but your response would be obvious.

PS. I'm not a "he".

So you think its justice what mundil got done for GBH ? are you for real?

Sorry I don't recall saying that? Pulling things out of the air again, are we? Furthermore, how is someone who wasn't in the court room able to make a substantial claim as to what each person should have been convicted with?

Seriously though. Would you like to respond to what DailyMail has presented us with?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What a suprise one side of a story. People would publish nonsense in order to justify a so called rape. What a suprise she talks of a attempted rape and bursts into tears, vile human being.

one side of the story with a few words automatically believe that side.

When people know his dead and cant speak on such allegations because they needed him to be murdered first then she could go to the police and cry attempted rape and get off lightly in court. You cant hide the fact that they didnt kill him.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You didn't offend me, don't worry dear. Surely my opinion in regards to murder is irrelevant to the actual argument, but I appreciate your attempt to steer the subject in a different direction. No, I personally don't condone murder, nor do I condone rape. I'd ask you what you think of rape, but your response would be obvious.

PS. I'm not a "he".

Sorry I don't recall saying that? Pulling things out of the air again, are we? Additionally, how is someone who wasn't in the court room able to make a substantial claim as to what each person should have been convicted with?

Seriously though. Would you like to respond to what DailyMail has presented us with?

You have not once said you disagree with the verdict you seem to ignore this issue you are ok with her getting just done for GBH? you seem like a mundil type to me 'my friend'.... sly manipulative kinda of woman ...men should be very warey of...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What a suprise one side of a story. People would publish nonsense in order to justify a so called rape. What a suprise she talks of a attempted rape and bursts into tears, vile human being.

one side of the story with a few words automatically believe that side.

When people know his dead and cant speak on such allegations because they needed him to be murdered first then she could go to the police and cry attempted rape and get off lightly in court. You cant hide the fact that they didnt kill him.

Clearly it's not one side of the story if HIS lawyer accepted that he'd attempted to rape her.

But you continue to ignore that. Additionally you make up anyy excuse when presented with evidence. You're actually claiming that people are misquoting Gagandip's lawyer? "Someone must have stolen his phone and sent the text"- can't forget that ridiculous statement. I'm sure your next argument will be that aliens came down to Earth and framed him.

I can't hide the fact that they didn't kill him? What? I give up with you, you ignore everything I say and go on about God knows what in order to support your view.

You have not once said you disagree with the verdict you seem to ignore this issue you are ok with her getting just done for GBH? you seem like a mundil type to me 'my friend'.... sly manipulative kinda of woman ...men should be very warey of...

Ouch ;) that's not very nice. What makes me a sly and manipulative woman? The fact that I disagree with your opinion and have challenged your baseless views?

Not to mention, you keep ignoring my question about the evidence DailyMail has posted.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
 Share


  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • yeh it's true, we shouldn't be lazy and need to learn jhatka shikaar. It doesn't help some of grew up in surrounding areas like Slough and Southall where everyone thought it was super bad for amrit dharis to eat meat, and they were following Sant babas and jathas, and instead the Singhs should have been normalising jhatka just like the recent world war soldiers did. We are trying to rectifiy this and khalsa should learn jhatka.  But I am just writing about bhog for those that are still learning rehit. As I explained, there are all these negative influences in the panth that talk against rehit, but this shouldn't deter us from taking khanda pahul, no matter what level of rehit we are!
    • How is it going to help? The link is of a Sikh hunter. Fine, but what good does that do the lazy Sikh who ate khulla maas in a restaurant? By the way, for the OP, yes, it's against rehit to eat khulla maas.
    • Yeah, Sikhs should do bhog of food they eat. But the point of bhog is to only do bhog of food which is fit to be presented to Maharaj. It's not maryada to do bhog of khulla maas and pretend it's OK to eat. It's not. Come on, bro, you should know better than to bring this Sakhi into it. Is this Sikh in the restaurant accompanied by Guru Gobind Singh ji? Is he fighting a dharam yudh? Or is he merely filling his belly with the nearest restaurant?  Please don't make a mockery of our puratan Singhs' sacrifices by comparing them to lazy Sikhs who eat khulla maas.
    • Seriously?? The Dhadi is trying to be cute. For those who didn't get it, he said: "Some say Maharaj killed bakras (goats). Some say he cut the heads of the Panj Piyaras. The truth is that they weren't goats. It was she-goats (ਬਕਰੀਆਂ). He jhatka'd she-goats. Not he-goats." Wow. This is possibly the stupidest thing I've ever heard in relation to Sikhi.
    • Instead of a 9 inch or larger kirpan, take a smaller kirpan and put it (without gatra) inside your smaller turban and tie the turban tightly. This keeps a kirpan on your person without interfering with the massage or alarming the masseuse. I'm not talking about a trinket but rather an actual small kirpan that fits in a sheath (you'll have to search to find one). As for ahem, "problems", you could get a male masseuse. I don't know where you are, but in most places there are professional masseuses who actually know what they are doing and can really relieve your muscle pains.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use