Ridding Punjab Of The Menace Of Shiv Sena

[11Gurus1Jot]

What West London Singh has done is just pointed out a fail safe fact that we had all missed. If all Sikhs signed up to it, it would work without doubt. Nobody would buy a product made by Nazis, so why should anybody buy products sold by the facist organisation, Shiv Sena. The Shiv Sena make even Nazis look like a Human Rights Origanisation!!

Question is, how many of us will spread West London Singh's Solution to this problem of hate filled, evil, Shiv Sena?

[nanosecond]

Remember that Badal is pro Shiv Sena and anti-Sikh. That's why Gursikh boys were killed and Shiv Sainiks were not even injured. And guess who's the DGP-Sumedh Saini........its obvious who's blood is he after.

Its only if Singhs take matter in their own hands that we can try to get rid of SS, but remember we will have lot more casualties and loss because of above mentioned reasons.

[Sherdil]

Is Shiv Sena part of the BJP/RSS grouping?. If so they are an alliance partner with Badal, they have only started getting big in the Punjab since Badal propped up the BJP. The BJP would not win any seats in the Punjab if it was not for Sikhs voting for the Badal Akali /BJP /RSS /Sant Samaj combine. .

Yeah your right. Badal is only aligned with BJP because they help him fend of the Congress at the polls. He loves his CM seat more than he loves Punjab and the panth.

[VanHelsingh]

Oh you are very wrong to doubt whether rural Sikhs have that kind of power. Just study the demographics. 85% of Punjab's Hindus are urban and of those, 50% have no monetary power and the other 50% own the buisnesses....thus are not reliant on anyone else's business.

Of the Sikhs, 80% are rural, thus dependent on the urban businesses to fulfill their business needs.

Moneywise, the urban Hindu with spending power is self sufficient on his own wider business family thus does not in any way benefit the Sikh. The rural Sikh, on the other hand, while having massive spending power, has no choice but to spend it in the Hindu owned businesses. Actually....they do have a choice. 80% of those businsses are owned by Hindus, many of whom are the driving force behind shiv sena, but 20% are owned by the urban Sikhs. The rural Sikhs......on whom the urban businsses feed......must now, whenever they go into town, whether buying cloth material, a new car, a motorcycle, a tractor, medical facilities anything. Whatever business they have they must ensure they do that business with a Sikh owned business.

Fair play. Let's hope our brethren back home have the will to take such action, and the third-world mentality doesn't override their thought processes.

How to inform them of this information? Sikh Channel? Sangat TV?

[chatanga]

One trade that the Sikhs do with the Hindus in the cities is the crop selling. A Sikh cannot take his produce to market and sell it, it can only be sold through an "artiya", and this is the law. The artiyas earn commision on the sale.

Most of the artiyas are hindus, and minority are Sikhs, but the use of SIkh artityas should be encouraged, and Sikhs shouldnt have any qualms about entering this profession either.

[11Gurus1Jot]

Fair play.

How to inform them of this information? Sikh Channel? Sangat TV?

Sikh Channel or Sangat TV may not stay on air! They have to fight the false legal battles the indian govt will inevitably put to them both. However, that will cost money, and because Sikhs are not prepared to pay a £1 a week to they will close!

Our Direct Debit money will be needed to fight false legal claims and pressures from the indian government/Shiv Sena/RSS/Chota Sauda/the Gadars amongst us, and all the other Sikhi haters, as well as run the Channels themselves. However, because most Sikhs will not help Sikh Channel or Sangat TV, they will go down - maybe we Sikhs actually want Sikh Channel and Sangat TV to go down, because we don't actually want the Sikhs to have a voice?? (who knows?).

Sikh Channel and Sangat TV can bearly pay the running costs, never mind the legal fights that will be coming over the approaching days and weeks - so how can they survive. eg the Sikh Channel and Sangat TV will need money to represent it's arrested reporters. Where will they get their money from for that, when they do not even have the running costs.

Can anybody answer why the majortiy of the hundreds of thousands of Sikhs in Britain are not supporting the Sikh Channel and Sangat TV financially at all? Why is it most Sikh are spending money on many other leisure products but not the Sikh Channel or Sangat TV?

Why won't we help them?