Jump to content

Badal & His Delhi Masters Have Won This Battle But Not The War

Recommended Posts

Also sant ranjit singh ji dhandrianwale have stayed out of politics and have kept its focus on gurmat parchar and amrit sachar...which is good. However, I do like mention on wider topic of sant samaj. Even Sant Samaj have difference of opinions in them, which is fine but the problem is disunity within sant samaj. People have to remember, sant samaj is not what it used to be. Sant Samaj these days is just an universal concept of sadhu mandali without any streamline organization or banner, while sticking to universal concept of sadhu mandali its fine thats the basic foundation discussing various gurmat related issues but having no organizational structure lacks and becoming one voice, only shows disunity... they are not on rajniti front these days, which is what it used to be during sant jarnail singh bhindranwale time..another viewpoint of looking at overall picture of sant samaj which i beleive -again while everyone like them to be front of all socio-political issues and be sant khalsa like - baba bir singh ji nurangabad, baba maharaj singh ji nurangabad, sant jarnail singh bhindranwale but reality is - there is time and place for everything as vahiguroo best knows so i cannot judge them.

Link to post
Share on other sites

So we must get arrested to be Panthic? lol

Let's not be so naive.

Why can we all not understand what Rajoana is saying to us? He wants us all to unite. All I am noticing is people coming out to divide.

In any 1 family not all members will agree with everything. We will have different ways of doing things. We will have different roles. We need to stick together.

Our enemies want to divide and rule.

Stop slinging mud.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Badal has already won this battle:

1. by going for a stay for rajoana's execution, he will let him rot in jail for another few years (at least if not more) as they wont release him or make him shaheed (which is the only two options open to the singhs)

2. they will never make rajoana jathedar of akal takht or any other takhts as they know this could tip things over the edge.

3. the takht jathedars are in Badals pocket as are Sant Samaj and Dhadrianwale

4. by arresting bittu daduwal etc there is no one to co-ordinate the early stages of this movement

5. Badal has total media control in Punjab and no one else outside Punjab in India really cares or knows

6. the actual protests in Punjab are actually quite small in number but much better than they have been for years

7. by shooting dead Jaspal Singh, they hope to scare (and have probably succeeded) mothers from sending their sons to protests or becoming militant in views and actions

8. nothing will happen to the suspended DC and SSP

9. in 2 months everything will be back to normal


battle has not been won it's just started. Don't you think in the matter of days the youth of punjab starts to realise these things are happening and start to refrain from drugs. Which Bhai Balwant Singh Ji told the youth to do which was stated in his letter

Link to post
Share on other sites

Avtar95 i think you misunderstand what i meant. a battle (this particular episode) is a small part of a larger war (freedom).

badal by using the media and his political nous and the jathedars (including sant samaj and dhadrianwale) has poured cold water on the hot flames

yes some youth will stop taking drugs and become singhs but we must accept this will be a small amount

there is no organised centralised protest movement and so everything wil die down

if dhadrianwale was not in badals pocket, he would lead the protests - if he did thousands would follow but he does not want to

even if you argue that sant samaj and dhadrianwale are trying to influence the akali dal from within they have clearly failed. badal has just used them to

silence the crowds and calm everything down. they dont realise that badal is too clever for them and has dealt with much more clever religious leaders than them

get rid of badal and his son and things will open up and provide a platform for political freedom

Link to post
Share on other sites

Father of Shaheed Bhai Jaspal Singh Ji speaks to the Sangat at his sons funeral on 31st March 2012 and invites all to attend the Akhand Paath Sahib Bhog and Antim Ardaas taking place on 7th April 2012, please watch:

Forward to all contacts in Punjab in order to support the Shaheed Singh's family.

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • 1 month later...

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • No problem veerji.It is night at my place and i was doing some school work.So i misunderstood 😂🙏🙏🙏 Bhul Chuk Maf 🙏
    • I would attach a pic but then it would have to be approved first so just click on the link in the OG post to know what I meant ji
    • Sorry ji I didn't mean dastaar I meant like the paghs mentioned in the link b4. Im all for singhni's wearing dastaar and dumalla but I meant when a woman is wearing a nok pagh and her hair is out. Looks so weird and looks like a topi   Sorry for the confusion ji, when I say pagh i usually refer to nok pagh and dastaar for any   Bhul Chuk Maaf Ji🙏
    • Vaheguru ji ka khalsa Vaheguru ji ki fateh Veerji, Guru Sahib gave Daastar di daat to every sikh, regardless if the sikh is a male or a female.So many great examples of Singhanis who wear daastar such as Mata Sahib Kaur Ji, Mata Sundri ji, Mata Gujri Ji,Mai Bhago ji, and countless others.When we take amrit and become Guru Wale,we can all wear Daastars, regardless of Gender. Bhul Chuk Maf 🙏 Vaheguru ji ka khalsa Vaheguru ji ki fateh
    • 1. First of all, I said "singhs who lead a decent lifestyle." A "singh" who commits domestic violence (or is abusive in any other way) does not lead a decent lifestyle. 2. I was commenting on someone else's comment where they wondered why women marry men in the entertainment industry who are known to be unfaithful. If you are so triggered by me using "singhs who lead a decent lifestyle" as a contrast to such men, then please just accept the following more general point: human being have a tendency to be attracted to power/money/fame/glamour/physical attraction and value those things over modesty/decency/piety. That's why you see a lot of people end up with partners who don't treat them well. At some point, they probably had a choice where they could have gone with someone who treated them better, but the person who would have treated them better was not attractive enough to them.
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use