Jump to content

Why Are So Many Moderate Sikhs Against Khalistan


hgsingh
 Share

Recommended Posts

Guest Jacfsing2

Waheguru

Can someone please answer some of these questions?

1 if khalistan is created what will happen to all the Gurdwaras that will be left outside of khalistan in india, will they be abandened like the ones in pakistan, because the hindus will kick out all the sikhs because they will say now you have your own country go there.

2 Right now we can do parchar all over india easily, if khalistan is created how will we spread sikhi in india? sikhs living outside of khalistan in india will be hated and the parcher will not go on.

3 right now punjab is 60% sikh. Namdharis radhaswami and other dera also claim to be sikh and they also are part of the 60% so that means sikhs who believe in the ten gurus are way less because namdharis and other groups who claim to be sikh are not sikh. Will they support khalistan.

4 If khalistan is created what would the stand be on missionaries converting people, will they have free range to do so.

1. Guru Nanak Dev Ji went to countries outside the land he was from: The Mughal Empire. And another thing is India is too dependent on the Sikhs to just keep them out of the country.

2. There's prachar in India? That's the silliest thing I've heard! Once Khalistan is formed Sikhs will be more free to spread Sikhi, similarly to how the Vatican spreads through lies, we'll spread truth through Khalistan.

3. They aren't Sikh in my book, a Sikh that doesn't believe Guru Sahib is the only Guru is not a Sikh at all, Guru Sahib once said his Rehat was more beloved than his Sikh. Whether they support it or not, Khalsa Akal Purakh Ki; Raj Kaerga Khalsa and Waheguru Ji Ka Khalsa Waheguru Ji Ki Fatah.

4. Missionaries should be allowed to take the fake Sikhs, they would change their religion to anything given a high enough bribe.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest Jacfsing2

Here are some more questions to your list:

How will I take out the trash in Khalistan?

How will I watch my tv, I like to lay on the sofa sometimes and sometimes I like to sit up straight? Who will help me decide, how I watch my tv?

Who will take care of my business when I leave for the Gurdwara? I am looking for someone. Please pm, if anyone is interested?

Will the Punj Pyare allow toilets in my house? I don't like going outside.

Will I still be able to buy chocolate in Khalistan? I really like chocolate.

:stupidme: :stupidme: :stupidme: :stupidme: :stupidme: :stupidme:

If i was drowning, don't help me. I don't want to live in this world with these very Smarty people.

For God sake have some common sense and look at the bigger picture of freedom for Sikhi to grow. Today the 3 foot kirpan wearing soorma are wrestling goats for a living and some are wrestling cooked meat at receptions on saturday and professors on sunday.

From what I read, I honestly don't know what side you take on Khalistan, do you think we need a physical place where Guru Sahib is king with Punj Pyare making some rules.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Waheguru

Can someone please answer some of these questions?

1 if khalistan is created what will happen to all the Gurdwaras that will be left outside of khalistan in india, will they be abandened like the ones in pakistan, because the hindus will kick out all the sikhs because they will say now you have your own country go there.

2 Right now we can do parchar all over india easily, if khalistan is created how will we spread sikhi in india? sikhs living outside of khalistan in india will be hated and the parcher will not go on.

3 right now punjab is 60% sikh. Namdharis radhaswami and other dera also claim to be sikh and they also are part of the 60% so that means sikhs who believe in the ten gurus are way less because namdharis and other groups who claim to be sikh are not sikh. Will they support khalistan.

4 If khalistan is created what would the stand be on missionaries converting people, will they have free range to do so.

Who said anything about Khalistan being restricted to the state of Punjab. When the misl's were fighting for self rule in the late 1700s they didn't limit themselves to a small patch of land. Guru Sahib said 'Raaj Karega Khalsa' and that's no different to the concept of Khalistan. Maharaaj also says 'Aaki Rahai N Koe', none shall oppose the Khalsa and people of all backgrounds will support Khalsa Raaj/Khalistan.

We can draw up maps but the reality is that no one knows the extent to which the Khalsa will rule. Our present goal is to carry on working towards freedom, Maharaaj will do the rest.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Who said anything about Khalistan being restricted to the state of Punjab. When the misl's were fighting for self rule in the late 1700s they didn't limit themselves to a small patch of land. Guru Sahib said 'Raaj Karega Khalsa' and that's no different to the concept of Khalistan. Maharaaj also says 'Aaki Rahai N Koe', none shall oppose the Khalsa and people of all backgrounds will support Khalsa Raaj/Khalistan.

We can draw up maps but the reality is that no one knows the extent to which the Khalsa will rule. Our present goal is to carry on working towards freedom, Maharaaj will do the rest.

Wahguru

I have seen some maps with parts of pakistan,rajastan and haryana in khalistan. Sikhs dont even form 5% of the poplution of those areas how will they just give up land, we cant fight them.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest Jacfsing2

Wahguru

I have seen some maps with parts of pakistan,rajastan and haryana in khalistan. Sikhs dont even form 5% of the poplution of those areas how will they just give up land, we cant fight them.

@BhagatBalmik when Ranjit Singh owned the Sikh empire Sikhs only made 15% of that land, an even more extreme example with another religion is that Muslims took over Spain with less than 5% of the population. We aren't here to start fights, we are here to end them. That's why they should surrender. Just say that you believe Guru Sahib is "weak" to your eyes, apparently Sava Lakh se Ek Larado means nothing to you. There were more Mughals in the army then there were Sikhs total, yet Guru Sahib won. (Are you 3HO?)
Link to comment
Share on other sites

@BhagatBalmik when Ranjit Singh owned the Sikh empire Sikhs only made 15% of that land, an even more extreme example with another religion is that Muslims took over Spain with less than 5% of the population. We aren't here to start fights, we are here to end them. That's why they should surrender. Just say that you believe Guru Sahib is "weak" to your eyes, apparently Sava Lakh se Ek Larado means nothing to you. There were more Mughals in the army then there were Sikhs total, yet Guru Sahib won. (Are you 3HO?)

Surrender? To who and why? Surrender to the Nihangs? Sikhi is dying day by day, and here you all sit fantasizing about Khalsa Raj, we can't even obtain Khalsa Raj in Punjab. I think we need to think a lot more short term, otherwise there will not even be a "long term."

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest Jacfsing2

Surrender? To who and why? Surrender to the Nihangs? Sikhi is dying day by day, and here you all sit fantasizing about Khalsa Raj, we can't even obtain Khalsa Raj in Punjab. I think we need to think a lot more short term, otherwise there will not even be a "long term."

I don't think Sikhi is dying, if Sikhi is dying than Guru Sahib would not exist, there were even fake Sikhs during the Guru Nanak Dev Ji time: he had 1 Sikh: Bhai Lehna who is now called Guru Angad Dev Ji, 200 years later Guru Gobind Singh Ji only had 5, today called the Punj Pyare, that's still an increase but only by 4, if even 1% of so called Sikhs were true Sikhs than we are still growing, Sikhi is about complete surrender to the Guru, but you believe that Sikhi means Punjabism.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't think Sikhi is dying, if Sikhi is dying than Guru Sahib would not exist, there were even fake Sikhs during the Guru Nanak Dev Ji time: he had 1 Sikh: Bhai Lehna who is now called Guru Angad Dev Ji, 200 years later Guru Gobind Singh Ji only had 5, today called the Punj Pyare, that's still an increase but only by 4, if even 1% of so called Sikhs were true Sikhs than we are still growing, Sikhi is about complete surrender to the Guru, but you believe that Sikhi means Punjabism.

Why can't Guru Sahib exist while Sikhi is dying BUT not yet dead?... The tremendous growth Sikhism had for a few centuries is not evidence of Sikhi still growing and flourishing today. I'm willing to bet day by day many more are leaving Sikhi than becoming true Gursikhs. Unless some sort of miracle occurs, Khalsa Raj will never happen. Silly to dream about unlimited Khalsa Raj, when even the small state of Punjab is slipping away.

Explain why you think I think Sikhi means Punjabism

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest Jacfsing2

Why can't Guru Sahib exist while Sikhi is dying BUT not yet dead?... The tremendous growth Sikhism had for a few centuries is not evidence of Sikhi still growing and flourishing today. I'm willing to bet day by day many more are leaving Sikhi than becoming true Gursikhs. Unless some sort of miracle occurs, Khalsa Raj will never happen. Silly to dream about unlimited Khalsa Raj, when even the small state of Punjab is slipping away.

Explain why you think I think Sikhi means Punjabism

Why I think you assume Sikhi= Punjabism is because of the way you feel as Punjab is the only Khalistan. If there are only 10 Sikhs today who are true Khalsas then Sikhi has at least doubled from 1699.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Why I think you assume Sikhi= Punjabism is because of the way you feel as Punjab is the only Khalistan. If there are only 10 Sikhs today who are true Khalsas then Sikhi has at least doubled from 1699.

I'm going based off of the fact the people in outside lands will likely not join Khalistan, nor will India/Pakistan give up those lands without a fight. If we were to say "well prior to the Anglo-Sikh wars, that was all our land" I don't think anyone would take us seriously.

Yeah, in that sense it has increased, but what about in the sense that perhaps 30 years ago there were 25 Sikhs, now we have dwindled down to 10 and in a few years down to 7 and so on. Is that signs of a flourishing faith?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
 Share


  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • yeh it's true, we shouldn't be lazy and need to learn jhatka shikaar. It doesn't help some of grew up in surrounding areas like Slough and Southall where everyone thought it was super bad for amrit dharis to eat meat, and they were following Sant babas and jathas, and instead the Singhs should have been normalising jhatka just like the recent world war soldiers did. We are trying to rectifiy this and khalsa should learn jhatka.  But I am just writing about bhog for those that are still learning rehit. As I explained, there are all these negative influences in the panth that talk against rehit, but this shouldn't deter us from taking khanda pahul, no matter what level of rehit we are!
    • How is it going to help? The link is of a Sikh hunter. Fine, but what good does that do the lazy Sikh who ate khulla maas in a restaurant? By the way, for the OP, yes, it's against rehit to eat khulla maas.
    • Yeah, Sikhs should do bhog of food they eat. But the point of bhog is to only do bhog of food which is fit to be presented to Maharaj. It's not maryada to do bhog of khulla maas and pretend it's OK to eat. It's not. Come on, bro, you should know better than to bring this Sakhi into it. Is this Sikh in the restaurant accompanied by Guru Gobind Singh ji? Is he fighting a dharam yudh? Or is he merely filling his belly with the nearest restaurant?  Please don't make a mockery of our puratan Singhs' sacrifices by comparing them to lazy Sikhs who eat khulla maas.
    • Seriously?? The Dhadi is trying to be cute. For those who didn't get it, he said: "Some say Maharaj killed bakras (goats). Some say he cut the heads of the Panj Piyaras. The truth is that they weren't goats. It was she-goats (ਬਕਰੀਆਂ). He jhatka'd she-goats. Not he-goats." Wow. This is possibly the stupidest thing I've ever heard in relation to Sikhi.
    • Instead of a 9 inch or larger kirpan, take a smaller kirpan and put it (without gatra) inside your smaller turban and tie the turban tightly. This keeps a kirpan on your person without interfering with the massage or alarming the masseuse. I'm not talking about a trinket but rather an actual small kirpan that fits in a sheath (you'll have to search to find one). As for ahem, "problems", you could get a male masseuse. I don't know where you are, but in most places there are professional masseuses who actually know what they are doing and can really relieve your muscle pains.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use