Jump to content

The Making Of Sikh History - Literally. A Translation.


Recommended Posts

Do you really think so?

Personally I'm fascinated by this stuff but I'm not sure about the majority of apnay. I mean even a thread about farting gets more attention than one like this ...... lol

Sad but true. In the west majority of apnay don`t read Punjabi language literature. So translations like this are very badly needed. I remember some time ago someone was posting English translation of Prof Sahib Singh`s Japji Sahib steek. That is the kind of seva that is really beneficial for Sikhs in the west and will help non Sikhs to also understand Sikhism on a whole new level.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Do you really think so?

Personally I'm fascinated by this stuff but I'm not sure about the majority of apnay. I mean even a thread about farting gets more attention than one like this ...... lol

This is the kind of work that will allow Sikhi to reach those people who simply have no idea about the faith or lump it in with the other dharmic religions. Academics and professors will lap this up.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Interesting read, thanks for sharing and translating. Sikhs have to take the role of researching and producing historical analysis of our own history and of Gurbani otherwise there is an endless list of people who are willing to impose their own take on who Sikhs are and what our history is.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Interesting read, thanks for sharing and translating. Sikhs have to take the role of researching and producing historical analysis of our own history and of Gurbani otherwise there is an endless list of people who are willing to impose their own take on who Sikhs are and what our history is.

More disturbing is the simple minded way some of our own people lap up outsider narratives when it inflates their sense of ego.

I feel that certain outside communities twigged onto this a long, long time ago and try to manipulate it to their own advantage whenever they get a chance. Especially via the academic forum or occasional documentaries through institutes like the BBC.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

More disturbing is the simple minded way some of our own people lap up outsider narratives when it inflates their sense of ego.

I feel that certain outside communities twigged onto this a long, long time ago and try to manipulate it to their own advantage whenever they get a chance. Especially via the academic forum or occasional documentaries through institutes like the BBC.

I can kind of see what you mean and can think of some examples myself (perhaps the attempted creation of a controversy on Dasam Granth Sahib). Would you classify The Sikh Story by Sonia Deol as a such a documentary? If not do you have any specific example you can share?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I had in mind the general portrayal we get here in England which rarely seems to get beyond the 'loyal sepoy' stereotype. Or when it comes to partition and 1984 - the impression that our politics is inherently violent, in a way dangerous to peace loving people. Often these documentaries I see appear to be little less than barely concealed army recruitment affairs. At some stage I'll try and post some examples of what I mean.

In the UK, it appears as if the only 'militant' Sikh identity that is acceptable is one that is being 'soldierly' strictly for Anglo causes. Any one that involves Sikhs fighting for Sikh causes is 'fundamentalist' etc.

When I think about it, underlying all this is the simple matter of being 'controlled'.

I read Edward Said's Orientalism recently and it sort alluded to the way colonialists helped foster particular stereotypes/identities that worked to their favour. Flattery was a common tactic, and I can't help but think that our people really fell for that one. I mean how many apnay were so busy fighting an essentially European war (WW2), without focusing on their own homeland. Sikhs came back from winning a war for outsiders and lost a massive chunk of their own homeland straight after. Apnay seemed to have been focusing on other people's causes to the detriment of their own. As a people that is not very astute.

There is a case for our lot being so caught up in the image of 'loyal stalwarts of the empire' that they lost the plot about matters closer to home.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I had in mind the general portrayal we get here in England which rarely seems to get beyond the 'loyal sepoy' stereotype. Or when it comes to partition and 1984 - the impression that our politics is inherently violent, in a way dangerous to peace loving people. Often these documentaries I see appear to be little less than barely concealed army recruitment affairs. At some stage I'll try and post some examples of what I mean.

In the UK, it appears as if the only 'militant' Sikh identity that is acceptable is one that is being 'soldierly' strictly for Anglo causes. Any one that involves Sikhs fighting for Sikh causes is 'fundamentalist' etc.

When I think about it, underlying all this is the simple matter of being 'controlled'.

I read Edward Said's Orientalism recently and it sort alluded to the way colonialists helped foster particular stereotypes/identities that worked to their favour. Flattery was a common tactic, and I can't help but think that our people really fell for that one. I mean how many apnay were so busy fighting an essentially European war (WW2), without focusing on their own homeland. Sikhs came back from winning a war for outsiders and lost a massive chunk of their own homeland straight after. Apnay seemed to have been focusing on other people's causes to the detriment of their own. As a people that is not very astute.

There is a case for our lot being so caught up in the image of 'loyal stalwarts of the empire' that they lost the plot about matters closer to home.

Harsh but the truth nonetheless.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 10 years later...

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
 Share

  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • yeh it's true, we shouldn't be lazy and need to learn jhatka shikaar. It doesn't help some of grew up in surrounding areas like Slough and Southall where everyone thought it was super bad for amrit dharis to eat meat, and they were following Sant babas and jathas, and instead the Singhs should have been normalising jhatka just like the recent world war soldiers did. We are trying to rectifiy this and khalsa should learn jhatka.  But I am just writing about bhog for those that are still learning rehit. As I explained, there are all these negative influences in the panth that talk against rehit, but this shouldn't deter us from taking khanda pahul, no matter what level of rehit we are!
    • How is it going to help? The link is of a Sikh hunter. Fine, but what good does that do the lazy Sikh who ate khulla maas in a restaurant? By the way, for the OP, yes, it's against rehit to eat khulla maas.
    • Yeah, Sikhs should do bhog of food they eat. But the point of bhog is to only do bhog of food which is fit to be presented to Maharaj. It's not maryada to do bhog of khulla maas and pretend it's OK to eat. It's not. Come on, bro, you should know better than to bring this Sakhi into it. Is this Sikh in the restaurant accompanied by Guru Gobind Singh ji? Is he fighting a dharam yudh? Or is he merely filling his belly with the nearest restaurant?  Please don't make a mockery of our puratan Singhs' sacrifices by comparing them to lazy Sikhs who eat khulla maas.
    • Seriously?? The Dhadi is trying to be cute. For those who didn't get it, he said: "Some say Maharaj killed bakras (goats). Some say he cut the heads of the Panj Piyaras. The truth is that they weren't goats. It was she-goats (ਬਕਰੀਆਂ). He jhatka'd she-goats. Not he-goats." Wow. This is possibly the stupidest thing I've ever heard in relation to Sikhi.
    • Instead of a 9 inch or larger kirpan, take a smaller kirpan and put it (without gatra) inside your smaller turban and tie the turban tightly. This keeps a kirpan on your person without interfering with the massage or alarming the masseuse. I'm not talking about a trinket but rather an actual small kirpan that fits in a sheath (you'll have to search to find one). As for ahem, "problems", you could get a male masseuse. I don't know where you are, but in most places there are professional masseuses who actually know what they are doing and can really relieve your muscle pains.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use