Jump to content

Ajnala, Dhumma, Badal, Majithia, Radha Soami Connection


Akal Takht on Bhai Amrik Singh Ajnala  

26 members have voted

  1. 1. If Bhai Amrik Singh Ajnala is excommunicated should we support him or Akal Takht?

    • Yes Bhai Amrik Singh Ajnala is correct about Radha Saomi Dera
    • No Harnam Singh Dhumma faction and Akal Takht are correct on Dera


Recommended Posts

Guys we all have similar feelings for Dhuma, but lets not attack Chatanga Jee as being a GOI mole or Gaddaar. Chatanga jee supporting Dhuma and Rode is not a good thing but I feel Chatanga Jee's heart is clean. Other than this one thing, he has always taken a very Panthic stance on things. I feel he is one of us, but just on the wrong side.

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
  • Replies 43
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Posts

I find it disgusting and feel almost hopeless for the Panth when people back people like Dhumma DESPITE knowing all these facts about him. Some people deny it, but there are those who know very well

The Radha Soami have connections with those who control people in high office. Even Ajit Phoola Nang had to apologise to them for stealing their 'babas' car. The Badals and the Jathedar they control w

excommunicating Bhai Amrik Singh Ji Ajnala would be suicide fo Badal and the jathedars. So they would never do it. In order for them to complete this. They would have to throw dirt on Bhai Amrik Si

Posted Images

Guys we all have similar feelings for Dhuma, but lets not attack Chatanga Jee as being a GOI mole or Gaddaar. Chatanga jee supporting Dhuma and Rode is not a good thing but I feel Chatanga Jee's heart is clean. Other than this one thing, he has always taken a very Panthic stance on things. I feel he is one of us, but just on the wrong side.

Agreed, I know for sure chatanga veerg doesn't have bad intentions and has just as much sharda than us and I know he has more than me and is more knowledgeable about Sikhi than me.

A simple difference in approach or whatever doesn't mean we got to make these things personal.

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

bro for someone as knowledgeable as you, you must have had a glassy lol, your last few posts have been opposite to the intelligent comments you usually make. Just out of interest, is there any particular reason you back Dhumma to the far extent that you do?

Link to post
Share on other sites

mate, what kind of reply is that. Why the need to get so personal.

Getting personal would mean to call his dad disgusting words like Chatanga did to Bhai Amrik Singh ji. What i asked is a legitimate question that should have been asked from day one from chatanga. If he is honest, I bet you his family has some business with Dhumma.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Agreed, I know for sure chatanga veerg doesn't have bad intentions and has just as much sharda than us and I know he has more than me and is more knowledgeable about Sikhi than me.

A simple difference in approach or whatever doesn't mean we got to make these things personal.

It's not a simple difference of approach. Obviously dirty polticials means a lot to Chatanga as he goes to the extent of swearing to Bhai Amrik Singh ji to protect Dhumma. Anyone that puts politics especially Dhumma before Gurmat needs to be checked out by mods. He reminds me of the punjabi singers that put on a dastar when it suits their agenda and when it doesn't the dastar is rolling around in the dirt.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Getting personal would mean to call his dad disgusting words like Chatanga did to Bhai Amrik Singh ji. What i asked is a legitimate question that should have been asked from day one from chatanga. If he is honest, I bet you his family has some business with Dhumma.

what kind of business does Dhumma run from which any benefit can be extracted upon? I think me and you both know that bad words are being called from all sides. Dont get me wrong I disagree with Chatanga on his stance on Dhumma, Rode and other dodgy akauti sikh leaders but no need to bring dads and families into it enit

Link to post
Share on other sites

And check this he's bathing in the Ganges on this pic representing Damdami Taksal

http://www.manglacha...-mela-2010.html

And in this 2nd pic he's with Izhar Alam the Muslim who killed thousands of Shaheeds

http://www.sikh24.co...-parkash-badal/

Plus Dhumma said Sant Jarnail Singh Khalsa Ji were shaheed when Sant Baba Thakur Singh Ji said otherwise

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Obviously dirty polticials means a lot to Chatanga as he goes to the extent of swearing to Bhai Amrik Singh ji to protect Dhumma.

Weasel, Baba Harnam Singh doesnt need my protection, and look at the words you have used for Baba Harnam Singh first, cos like a weasel you soon start crying if someone you respect is called names, but you dont hold back yourself.

Just out of interest, is there any particular reason you back Dhumma to the far extent that you do?

Firstly let me make this clear, I personally would have prefered that this alliance with badal had never taken place, but i UNDERSTAND why it has taken place, and see it as necessary for this moment in time. Some people dont and that is their prerogative, but the name calling and outright denigration of Baba Harnam Singh is just getting worse and worse, by weasel and co, that I have to respond. If you dont want any part of it, then just keep your mouths shut. And the same goes for Amrick SIngh, why not focus on his own agenda, rather than Baba Harnam Singhs?

Why be typical panjabis and start pulling back those that are trying to do somethign for our Panth?

Link to post
Share on other sites
I have 2 questions for you since you think you know everything:

Who first termed the phrase " puran azadi" ?

Why was it used,rather than Khalistan?

So what's this? A way for find out whether I was in the know about decisions made at that time? I suppose some of the people you know gave you full details of all the decisions made at that time or maybe they just wanted to get you off their backs so gave you some information they though an eager young pup would take as gospel. The concern isn't whether it was Rode or someone else who came up with the concept, it is the way Rode used the concept to confuse the movement. Rode played the 'Puran Azadi' card sometimes claiming it could be within in the Indian political framework or sometimes outside. He was a typical plant to confuse the movement at a time when the movement was on the up. The Panthic committee made the announcement and they left the complex but this did not change the ground reality that the de-facto control of the complex was with the Kharkoos evidenced by their destruction of the Sarkari Takht which another one of the traitors you support had bulit on behalf of Indira Gandhi. Your sneering comment about the way the Panthic committee left the complex shows where your true loyaty lies.

Ala Singh was a self serving local leader who saw his opportunity to create a state out of the chaos of the end of Mughal rule. He took Amrit when it suited him and then helped Abdali when it suited him. The fact that he and his descendents chose to keep striking coins in with Abdali's motif even when the Afghan rule has ceased showed where their true allegience lay. The funny thing is that Guru Gobind Singh according to the sakhis was the one who bestowed political power to the descendents of Triloka and Phul but the maharajas chose to place Abdali's motif on their coins.

Now perhaps you can answer my question about what benefit the alliance between Dhumma and Badal has brought the Panth. I have already mentioned that the memorial has been changed from one that could have celebrated the shaheedi of the Sikhs in 1984 with photos and other items from that time to one which will be just another whitewashed Gurdwara.

Any comment on the role played by Rode on the link I gave you?

http://www.cscsarchive.org:8081/MediaArchive/liberty.nsf/%28docid%29/0A1E2222519201ECE5256A1C003504E4

Link to post
Share on other sites

It's not a simple difference of approach. Obviously dirty polticials means a lot to Chatanga as he goes to the extent of swearing to Bhai Amrik Singh ji to protect Dhumma. Anyone that puts politics especially Dhumma before Gurmat needs to be checked out by mods. He reminds me of the punjabi singers that put on a dastar when it suits their agenda and when it doesn't the dastar is rolling around in the dirt.

It doesn't matter whether someone's opinions are 99% with the Panth and only 1% are with some self serving Badal puppet. The problem is when someone is so enamoured with someone that they choose to forgo common sense and support that person to the hilt.

Link to post
Share on other sites
So what's this? A way for find out whether I was in the know about decisions made at that time? I suppose some of the people you know gave you full details of all the decisions made at that time or maybe they just wanted to get you off their backs so gave you some information they though an eager young pup would take as gospel.

Tony, you really can be a bit sore sometimes you know? i hope you haven't been taking lessons from the weasel, as 1 drama queen on this forum is enough, but you seem to be on the way there. You really do sound like a girl, and that is disappointing, cos you have made some really excellent observations on this forum. You are above these childish remarks. and the quote above is just emabarrassing enough for me to read, but as for writing it...

The concern isn't whether it was Rode or someone else who came up with the concept...

That is exactly what the concern is. Who's plan was this "puran azadi"? You dont know, so just say it, dont skirt around the issue.

The Panthic committee made the announcement and they left the complex but this did not change the ground reality that the de-facto control of the complex was with the Kharkoos evidenced by their destruction of the Sarkari Takht which another one of the traitors you support had bulit on behalf of Indira Gandhi.

There you go again, with your childish remarks. I have never supported Baba Santa Singh over his role in 1984. Was it the Kharkoos only who pulled down sarkari takht, or was it the Sangat of the Guru, led by the Damdami Taksal, inc AISSF ?

Explain to us all how de-facto control remained with the Panthic Committee, after they left Darbar Sahib?

Your sneering comment about the way the Panthic committee left the complex shows where your true loyaty lies.

Sneering? dear oh dear. I know why they left, and i have never sneered at them. Honestly, you do sound like the weasel. Knowing where my loyalty lies. what a joker.

I had a read of it, and I again tell you you cant trust everything you read in books, or rely on them for the full information.

Tony, i see like a devious politician youhave skirted around the questions asked to you, and instead tried to defame the questioner, or other people the questioner has links with, and actually you have done that to an appalling standard. Just answer the questions bro, no ifs and buts.

We are all here to learn, although some are on here to prove themselves as something. I dont want to argue with you for the sake of arguing, i just want to share what i have learned through my personal experiences, not by reading books, with the forum.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Weasel, Baba Harnam Singh doesnt need my protection, and look at the words you have used for Baba Harnam Singh first, cos like a weasel you soon start crying if someone you respect is called names, but you dont hold back yourself.

I didn't state one word that wasn't true about Harnam Singh. We all know Dhumma has romantic dinners with Badal. Thats a fact that Dhumma doesn't hide for one second. A member has posted a photo of this open display of affection Dhumma has for Badal. Only you want to stay blind to this reality because you want Dhumma all for yourself. And we also know, which you stated yourself, that Dhumma is some kind of CIA agent for the Panth that is fighting the good fight from within.

Honestly i think Chatanga is on his period. Only a girl on her periods whines this much to protect her lover (Dhumma).

The weasel here is you, for ignoring my question about your family being in bed with Dhumma. Also you ignore the facts Dhumma used and uses Badals forces to kick out Gursikhs after he was not given the seva of Taksal and took it by force. How sad can your lover get?

Pull your lovers pants up............hes been exposed

Link to post
Share on other sites

weasel, you try and be smart, writing stupid things, but im not going to respond to your childishness.

your facts about Baba Harnam Singh are for you only. SGPC did not recognise Baba Harnam Singh as the new mukhi, they recognised Ram Singh and gave him siropa as well. Even at this point amrik was with Baba Harnam Singh, closer to him than I am, so if i am Baba Ji's lover, then by your logic, amrik must postively have been his <banned word filter activated>.

Baba Harnam Singh did not need or use Badal, as amrik's crew had already split, even before any agreement was made with badal. You can peddle your facts how you want. They won't stand up to the scrutiny of history. Or even minor research for that matter.

Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.



×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use