Jump to content

Kachhera Wet See-Through...showering/ishnaan


Guest Confused_gupt
 Share

Recommended Posts

Guest interestin...

I guess everyone's someone has a link to a village ..so calling villagers backward and illiterate vlearly shows the utter disrespect the author has for people posting to the forum. Rather than being polite and giving your thoughts the reader chose to question the mentality of the post originator...I would suggest if you feel like being a personal basher please avoid posting. Thanks.

Erm hello read what i put before dishing out pointless lectures. What i said was in response to kalyugi saying sumt on the lines of- kick their heads in. No personal bashing there mate, just me outlining my opinion. Problem? Dont read

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Men and women are not divided on opposite sides of the sarovar (though women have enclosed areas to bath), from my experience men tend to bath in the open areas and anyone and everyone can walk past. The original poster has asked a valid question.

Agreed

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Give over, this thread is a piss-take. The guy was talking about Singh on Singh because I've never seen a Singhni in close quarters to another bathing Singh so that she can see "creases" and "folds". :blink2: Bibia are all the way over on their side (e.g. Darbar Sahib), so unless they've got Superman's zoom vision or a pair of high-powered binoculars I doubt they'll be able to see aforementioned folds and creases from their end.

The Singhnia issue was only mentioned in passing when he said maybe Singhs should have a seperate enclosure for bathing as well. This is an absolute non-issue - it's not even worth thinking about nevermind starting a topic for discussion. I'm baffled as to the thought processes of some people.

What? Singh and Singhnia are in total segregation at Darbar Sahib?! Lol

Haha supervision! Maybe a little less super hero dramas for u veer

Theres two ishnaan ghats at darbar sahib right? Are they both for bibiya?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

No but we could do with a little more compassion, patience and understanding.

This topic aside, people from all walks of life, all background and different levels of exposure to Sikhi come to this forum seeking help, advice and information. Just because a question may seem silly, irrelevant or nothing to do with Sikhi it doesn't mean we should go straight in and attack. Someone, somewhere once helped us and answered our questions which is where our knowledge stems from today, have a little Daya and put yourself in the shoes of the other person.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Why cant we al just use discretion and a little bit of common sense, is that too hard or do we need rules to be set for everything?

It's exactly this point that worries me for the future. Islam (or certain strict interpretations of it) have exactly this problem whereby there's a rule and regulation for the most inconsequential of things, mostly modern-day issues for which there were clearly no precedents when the faith was founded thousands of years ago. Rarely is the follower encouraged to solve the issue at their own discretion. Instead there has to be a ruling or a mandate from somewhere which is then backed up by a tenuous link to scripture by modern-day scholars. God forbid this kind of stuff ever finds its way into Sikhi, but if we need guidance from 3rd parties on issues such as these then I expect we'll be joining that club in a few years as well. Yet people are actually encouraging this kind of behaviour!

God gaves us budh. Lets use it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's exactly this point that worries me for the future. Islam (or certain strict interpretations of it) have exactly this problem whereby there's a rule and regulation for the most inconsequential of things, mostly modern-day issues for which there were clearly no precedents when the faith was founded thousands of years ago. Rarely is the follower encouraged to solve the issue at their own discretion. Instead there has to be a ruling or a mandate from somewhere which is then backed up by a tenuous link to scripture by modern-day scholars. God forbid this kind of stuff ever finds its way into Sikhi, but if we need guidance from 3rd parties on issues such as these then I expect we'll be joining that club in a few years as well. Yet people are actually encouraging this kind of behaviour!

God gaves us budh. Lets use it.

I never thought I would say this but for once I agree with you!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
 Share


  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • yeh it's true, we shouldn't be lazy and need to learn jhatka shikaar. It doesn't help some of grew up in surrounding areas like Slough and Southall where everyone thought it was super bad for amrit dharis to eat meat, and they were following Sant babas and jathas, and instead the Singhs should have been normalising jhatka just like the recent world war soldiers did. We are trying to rectifiy this and khalsa should learn jhatka.  But I am just writing about bhog for those that are still learning rehit. As I explained, there are all these negative influences in the panth that talk against rehit, but this shouldn't deter us from taking khanda pahul, no matter what level of rehit we are!
    • How is it going to help? The link is of a Sikh hunter. Fine, but what good does that do the lazy Sikh who ate khulla maas in a restaurant? By the way, for the OP, yes, it's against rehit to eat khulla maas.
    • Yeah, Sikhs should do bhog of food they eat. But the point of bhog is to only do bhog of food which is fit to be presented to Maharaj. It's not maryada to do bhog of khulla maas and pretend it's OK to eat. It's not. Come on, bro, you should know better than to bring this Sakhi into it. Is this Sikh in the restaurant accompanied by Guru Gobind Singh ji? Is he fighting a dharam yudh? Or is he merely filling his belly with the nearest restaurant?  Please don't make a mockery of our puratan Singhs' sacrifices by comparing them to lazy Sikhs who eat khulla maas.
    • Seriously?? The Dhadi is trying to be cute. For those who didn't get it, he said: "Some say Maharaj killed bakras (goats). Some say he cut the heads of the Panj Piyaras. The truth is that they weren't goats. It was she-goats (ਬਕਰੀਆਂ). He jhatka'd she-goats. Not he-goats." Wow. This is possibly the stupidest thing I've ever heard in relation to Sikhi.
    • Instead of a 9 inch or larger kirpan, take a smaller kirpan and put it (without gatra) inside your smaller turban and tie the turban tightly. This keeps a kirpan on your person without interfering with the massage or alarming the masseuse. I'm not talking about a trinket but rather an actual small kirpan that fits in a sheath (you'll have to search to find one). As for ahem, "problems", you could get a male masseuse. I don't know where you are, but in most places there are professional masseuses who actually know what they are doing and can really relieve your muscle pains.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use