Jump to content

Recommended Posts

fiveonly - it is indeed quite difficult to get a simple message across to you.its like talking to a brick wall. YOU WROTE.

Your argument is trying to scare a person in believing their are different reasons to take up udasi. I can switch this very easily on you and say do you really think Satguru just put on a Muslim blue garb to leave behind his wife and children to teach Muslims in Mecca. Remember Mecca is much further and the journey was much longer. So there must be different reasons why he went to Mecca. Just like you and Hari Singh Randhawa i can make up theories saying......ooooo Satguru didn't just dress up as a Muslim, but was a Muslim. Then to add reason to my arguement i can say Muslim means to completely submit to Allah. Therefore Satguru was a Muslim of the Koran because he completely submit to Allah (call God whatever you want, there is only one) and the Koran teaches to completely submit to Allah.

So Benti, leave your scare tactics out of this discussion. Maybe these scare tactics work with other Sikhs, but they won't work here.

err what the hell are you onnabout??? So you are saying Guru Nanak went on 4 Udasi's just to teach the udasi's what true udas is. Yes or no. Also in Hari Singh katha at what time does he talk about nirmala. I guess you are referring to the maria sika jagat vich shabad...This is not a distortion by Giani Hari Singh...every samparda adopts a certain shabad and attachs it to their samparda ie, garieh shabad sache taksal.....now here the arth are spiritual but it can aslo mean learn the shabad at the school of Dami Dami Taksal. Now the question is, does this fit the Gurmat kasvatee (test) answer..yes it does, so hence you can use it as your signauture just like Taksal has. Nirmal Akhara chose bhai gurdas shabad maria sikha jagat vich etc etc. Yest you are saying this is a distortion of Bani ...I think you cant grasp this point

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Can someone tell me why is Baba Sri Chand Jee blue? someone else asked this but no one answered.

how do you know sri chand were blue ?? have you met them.........photo can be drawn by anyone nobody will say anything. If you look at the picture of Guru Gobind Singh Ji giving darshan to a hindu pandit as Ram Chandra he is depicted as blue skinned. Yet typical pictures of Ram are of fair skin. Older pictures are that he was blue. its really irrelevant. Can you save these sort of post for www.Tapoban.org site LOL

Link to comment
Share on other sites

how do you know sri chand were blue ?? have you met them.........photo can be drawn by anyone nobody will say anything. If you look at the picture of Guru Gobind Singh Ji giving darshan to a hindu pandit as Ram Chandra he is depicted as blue skinned. Yet typical pictures of Ram are of fair skin. Older pictures are that he was blue. its really irrelevant. Can you save these sort of post for www.Tapoban.org site LOL

The reason I ask is because I've seen pictures of Baba Sri Chand jee since childhood and they always show him as blue. Why? I can understand that Hindus depict Raam and Krishan as blue because they were avtars of vishnu who was probably blue. But why is Baba Sri Chand ji blue?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

the blue colour is really a grey colour, as jogis and other sadhus would smear their bodies in ash from funeral pyres, leaving their bodies grey. They did this as a reminder that death is always close by.

I dont think that Baba Sri Chand was grey, nor do i think that the way he is portrayed in paintings is accurate, clothing-wise and colour-wise.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ^^

"Je kisse izzat daar purakh di besti karni

ohnooo keho "sardara tu ta bohut changa teri tan jinni vadiyayeee par teri alaud bardi nakkami jamm payi, teri alaud ni suddar sakki, bas ohdi besti kar ditti"

meaning

"If you want to disgrace an honorable individual, tell him "Oh Sardara, you are very great and whatever good there is applies to you, but your kids are worthless and they couldn't be disciplined", you just disgraced him"

which is why I said this:

"It's important to note that Guru Har Rai Ji disowned his elder son, Ram Rai, for distorting bani to please Aurangzeb. There's a reason why Gurtagaddi was passed to Guru Angad Dev Ji."

I am no Giani ji, just an average Sikh so I can't explain the Gurbani, but I think it is relevant and sheds light here.

This is a very important point but the chelas of Baba Hari Singh are ignoring this point because anyone with some sound knowledge of Sikh history would be able address this point of Baba Hari Singh. If someone had stood up from the audience and pointed out a load of rubbish his point was that would have been the end [MOD CUT]

*MOD EDIT* - All inflammatory posts that don't have anything to do with this topic have been deleted. It is advised you think before you post. This applies to everyone equally.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I understood what Baba Hari Singh was saying and respect him as a parcharak and have seen some of his videos , but just because he said one thing that is wrong (in this case), it doesn't make him or people who follow him bad.

He made a mistake on this point [FACT], but it doesn't discredit who Baba Hari Singh Randhawe is. Let's not attack him and just stick to the issues of how what he said was wrong, everyone makes mistakes, it's not a big deal.

Let's keep it issue based. This thread has gone on 7 pages without turning into a flame fest, please don't turn it into one as Kalyugi paaji said.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This is a very important point but the chelas of Baba Hari Singh are ignoring this point because anyone with some sound knowledge of Sikh history would be able address this point of Baba Hari Singh. If someone had stood up from the audience and pointed out a load of rubbish his point was that would have been the end of his so-called Santship. He is obviously a complete fake.

what exactly is the point - non chelas of Baba Hari Singh, what has Giani Ji said wrong and what has it got to do with Guru Har Rai excommuniating his son.

"The spastic said to the deaf man let me tell you a knowledgable story. Later he replied oh now i am enlightened."

Link to comment
Share on other sites

what exactly is the point - non chelas of Baba Hari Singh, what has Giani Ji said wrong and what has it got to do with Guru Har Rai excommuniating his son.

"The spastic said to the deaf man let me tell you a knowledgable story. Later he replied oh now i am enlightened."

I would have thought that was obvious. Baba Hari Singh claims that those who are criticising Baba Sri Chand are indirectly insulting Guru Nanak because the greatest insult you can say to someone is to say that your sons are unworthy. But many of the sons of the Gurus were unworthy such as Ram Rai and Prithi Chand. So here you have someone whom his chelas claim to be a BRAHMGYANI but he cannot see how flawed his argument is and how easy it is to show that he cannot put forward a consistent argument. I am sure a large number of the people in the audience know the story of Ram Rai and Prithi Chand yet they allowed his foolish argument to pass without showing his argument for what it is. Had someone stood up and shown his how inconsistent his argument was then maybe he would go back reading basic Sikh history and come back with a consistent argument.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
 Share


  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • yeh it's true, we shouldn't be lazy and need to learn jhatka shikaar. It doesn't help some of grew up in surrounding areas like Slough and Southall where everyone thought it was super bad for amrit dharis to eat meat, and they were following Sant babas and jathas, and instead the Singhs should have been normalising jhatka just like the recent world war soldiers did. We are trying to rectifiy this and khalsa should learn jhatka.  But I am just writing about bhog for those that are still learning rehit. As I explained, there are all these negative influences in the panth that talk against rehit, but this shouldn't deter us from taking khanda pahul, no matter what level of rehit we are!
    • How is it going to help? The link is of a Sikh hunter. Fine, but what good does that do the lazy Sikh who ate khulla maas in a restaurant? By the way, for the OP, yes, it's against rehit to eat khulla maas.
    • Yeah, Sikhs should do bhog of food they eat. But the point of bhog is to only do bhog of food which is fit to be presented to Maharaj. It's not maryada to do bhog of khulla maas and pretend it's OK to eat. It's not. Come on, bro, you should know better than to bring this Sakhi into it. Is this Sikh in the restaurant accompanied by Guru Gobind Singh ji? Is he fighting a dharam yudh? Or is he merely filling his belly with the nearest restaurant?  Please don't make a mockery of our puratan Singhs' sacrifices by comparing them to lazy Sikhs who eat khulla maas.
    • Seriously?? The Dhadi is trying to be cute. For those who didn't get it, he said: "Some say Maharaj killed bakras (goats). Some say he cut the heads of the Panj Piyaras. The truth is that they weren't goats. It was she-goats (ਬਕਰੀਆਂ). He jhatka'd she-goats. Not he-goats." Wow. This is possibly the stupidest thing I've ever heard in relation to Sikhi.
    • Instead of a 9 inch or larger kirpan, take a smaller kirpan and put it (without gatra) inside your smaller turban and tie the turban tightly. This keeps a kirpan on your person without interfering with the massage or alarming the masseuse. I'm not talking about a trinket but rather an actual small kirpan that fits in a sheath (you'll have to search to find one). As for ahem, "problems", you could get a male masseuse. I don't know where you are, but in most places there are professional masseuses who actually know what they are doing and can really relieve your muscle pains.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use