Jump to content

Sikhi and science


Recommended Posts

  • 5 weeks later...

Darwin's theory of evolution

Sri Guru Granth Sahib Jee Ang 176 - Sahib Sri Guru Arjan Dev Jee Maharaj

ਕਈ ਜਨਮ ਭਏ ਕੀਟ ਪਤੰਗਾ ॥

In so many incarnations, you were a worm and an insect;

ਕਈ ਜਨਮ ਗਜ ਮੀਨ ਕੁਰੰਗਾ ॥

in so many incarnations, you were an elephant, a fish and a deer.

ਕਈ ਜਨਮ ਪੰਖੀ ਸਰਪ ਹੋਇਓ ॥

In so many incarnations, you were a bird and a snake.

ਕਈ ਜਨਮ ਹੈਵਰ ਬ੍ਰਿਖ ਜੋਇਓ ॥੧॥

In so many incarnations, you were yoked as an ox and a horse. ||1||

Could Guru Sahib also be referring to reincarnation?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

the uy in te video is using fallaces. he talks about big bang and iflation bein mutually exclusive, when they are totally not. inflation is a part of the big bang. and throughout, he uses bani to back up points that can be broken down. which will lead people to say, this threfore means gurbani was rong in saying such and such.

its good he talks aobut the dhundhookaar and stuff.. but

and then he mis uses sache te pavana bhaya. saying a chemical reaction gives of gasses. just wrong use totally. its (many) times i this video, where this is a perfect example showing how he uses gurbani to support his own conclusions. all a person needs to do is give one of the many many reactions that dont produce gas. thus disproving his point, and s called, dis-proving gurbani.. and gurbani cannot be dispoved. !

then he says, we dont know how old the universes. corse we do!

then he says about grbani saying before the sun and the moon, there was no tim.. when scienc and us, both kno that there were!

then he uses ki janam bhae keet paanga to make the outragous totally outlandish point, "evolution is in gurbani because look, guru G says we have re incarnated so many times." this is utter misuse.!. just because our guru says we have reincarnation, doesnt prove flipin evolution.

and the post made after this video, also a misuse.

then he talks about the bigcrunch. laughable. (sorry to say). u cant have inflation be true, as well as big crunch. accelleration of universe. B-/

then sus ghar soor vasai. utter misuse! mon does not mean literal moon. read the shabad!

>>

sbdu BwKq sis joiq Apwrw ]

sabadh bhaakhath sas joth apaaraa |

Giving voice to the Shabad, the moon of the mind is illuminated with infinity.

sis Gir sUru vsY imtY AMiDAwrw ]

sas ghar soor vasai mittai andhiaaraa |

When the sun dwells in the house of the moon, the darkness is dispelled.

<<

the arath is about hirda!!!!!! not sun and moon!

and he sems to fail to understand centrifugal force, and gravititonal force!!! fmj .. then he says, when he was studying xyz...

then he says, the flipin thing about the jort. again.. misuse.

pseudo-sikhi in action. weheyyyyy....

dhan guru he spoke gurbani with intension of jorring sangat to guru.. but its brainwashy..

real sikhi is muchbetter than pseudo sikhi..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I noticed that as well Alias, but it wasn't bad. It was his perspective.

I prefer Sant Singh Maskeen's views though in this particular case because it focuses solely on Gurbani. Just merely repeating Gurbani is enough to show that the big bang theory (which only provides a very partial explanation) is scratching the surface of what Guru Nanak Dev Ji has told.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
 Share


  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • yeh it's true, we shouldn't be lazy and need to learn jhatka shikaar. It doesn't help some of grew up in surrounding areas like Slough and Southall where everyone thought it was super bad for amrit dharis to eat meat, and they were following Sant babas and jathas, and instead the Singhs should have been normalising jhatka just like the recent world war soldiers did. We are trying to rectifiy this and khalsa should learn jhatka.  But I am just writing about bhog for those that are still learning rehit. As I explained, there are all these negative influences in the panth that talk against rehit, but this shouldn't deter us from taking khanda pahul, no matter what level of rehit we are!
    • How is it going to help? The link is of a Sikh hunter. Fine, but what good does that do the lazy Sikh who ate khulla maas in a restaurant? By the way, for the OP, yes, it's against rehit to eat khulla maas.
    • Yeah, Sikhs should do bhog of food they eat. But the point of bhog is to only do bhog of food which is fit to be presented to Maharaj. It's not maryada to do bhog of khulla maas and pretend it's OK to eat. It's not. Come on, bro, you should know better than to bring this Sakhi into it. Is this Sikh in the restaurant accompanied by Guru Gobind Singh ji? Is he fighting a dharam yudh? Or is he merely filling his belly with the nearest restaurant?  Please don't make a mockery of our puratan Singhs' sacrifices by comparing them to lazy Sikhs who eat khulla maas.
    • Seriously?? The Dhadi is trying to be cute. For those who didn't get it, he said: "Some say Maharaj killed bakras (goats). Some say he cut the heads of the Panj Piyaras. The truth is that they weren't goats. It was she-goats (ਬਕਰੀਆਂ). He jhatka'd she-goats. Not he-goats." Wow. This is possibly the stupidest thing I've ever heard in relation to Sikhi.
    • Instead of a 9 inch or larger kirpan, take a smaller kirpan and put it (without gatra) inside your smaller turban and tie the turban tightly. This keeps a kirpan on your person without interfering with the massage or alarming the masseuse. I'm not talking about a trinket but rather an actual small kirpan that fits in a sheath (you'll have to search to find one). As for ahem, "problems", you could get a male masseuse. I don't know where you are, but in most places there are professional masseuses who actually know what they are doing and can really relieve your muscle pains.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use