Fearless Singhni - Kaur of Guru Gobind Singh

[Singh559]

This Kaur is amazing and beautiful.

There isn't a news site (well maybe Fox) that hasn't covered this. One of the articles has around 200,000 likes on Facebook.

Wow.

A great article:

http://shine.yahoo.c...-203500244.html

"My hair doesn't stop me from being normal or doing service so its not a hindrance," she said in a later post. "I've been to the doctor regarding this and it's just a side effect of my hormone levels during my teenage years. The hormones have returned to normal, but the hair is still there. That's fine I don't regret anything, nor do I view it as an unfortunate thing."

Guru Gobind Singh Ji takes care of his Sikh if that Sikh has pakka vishwaas and walks on the path that has been laid out. Waheguru

[Mehtab Singh]

This is my message to all those who posted inappropriate comments under all those news articles on all those news websites which glorified bhenji...

The news about Balpreet Kaur bhenji has made all Sikhs worldwide very proud. Nonetheless, some of the hateful, cheap and disgusting comments I came across under the news articles glorifying her compassionate response to an ignorant creature's unlawful act exposes the existence of a demented segment of society we live among. I even saw a Youtube video where a supposed atheist and an agnostic on one hand respect the maturity of her response, and simultaneously poke fun at the concept of religion. I begin to wonder what academic credentials such people possess before they start typing online or before opening their mouth in front of the camera. Agreed, you're not accustomed to walk past a girl with excessive facial hair. Rather than trying to figure out why would someone do that in this modern day and age, and then why would she be proud of it, you choose to expose your slave mentality by engaging in the most retarded degree of communication which would even put animals to shame. I call it slave mentality because all those sewage worms out there who made those dirty comments, who came on the camera and talked about religion without having any sort of allegiance to any, they are all slaves. The worst part is that they don't even realize that they are slaves. They are slaves to a norm created by the media, a norm that defines what is beauty. They are slaves to a norm created by society, a norm that defines what is good looking. They are slaves to a norm created by their generation, a norm that defines what looks cool. Well guess what you worms, your norms are not going to survive forever. Your norms were created to change and die, because what is beautiful today will be boring tomorrow, what is good looking today will be out of fashion tomorrow, and what is cool today will be primitive tomorrow. However, the legacy of Balpreet Kaur bhenji will stay on forever. For times to come, you and your forthcoming generations will read about her, and how she gracefully and compassionately reacted and responded to a low life who was insensitive enough to take her picture without her permission and post it online. You and your forthcoming generations will see how the norms created by media, society and the future generations change with the passage of time. And someday, when that media, that society and the generation of that time defines beauty the same was as Balpreet Kaur bhenji did, every single worm among all of you who made those negative remarks will see your own progeny look exactly like Balpreet Kaur bhenji. That particular moment, no matter what month and year it is, that day and date you dirty and disgusting worms, will be when all those filthy words you typed and said in September of 2012 will come back to you and haunt your memories till the day your corpse is buried in your graves. Mark my words, nature takes its own course. Today you are using the Internet and hiding behind fake names. A day will come when you won't find any possible way to hide, and will be faced with the truth. The truth will be the fashion of that age, and it will be the same face which you dirt bags mocked in September of 2012. You will be responded to and with full interest. Just wait and watch as its just a matter of time. Balpreet Kaur bhenji was nice enough to let you guys know about the philosophy of her religion. I am being blunt here and foreseeing your own future. Live your rotten lives the way you want to, but you will be getting what you deserve, as its coming your way. I adore her for being respectful towards a loser who invaded her privacy, but I guess there are stinking termites out there who need to be put in place, hence the strong-worded message.

Please don't take any of this personally people, its specifically for those who put up inappropriate comments under those news websites. Can't be bothered to post on the same page where a sister was mocked at, so putting it up here, hoping atleast one of them reads me and cringes.

[Only five]

Everyone asks questions ...What else is the purpose of this forum ? Whenever I see something contrary to what they preach or say they believe in , I say it !

Even Guru Nanak devji questioned EVERYTHING of his time ! People on day of his janeu ceremony must have said same thing ! "this guys gone nuts" , "the child is spoiling our traditions" .. :D

Sir, Satguru never questioned. If Satguru questioned everything, then that means he didn't know the answer to the questions he was asking. If this took place, then Sri Guru Nanak Dev Ji Maharaj is not Satguru. Since Gurbani never lies as Gurbani tells us Satguru Sri Guru Nanak Dev ji Maharaj is Satguru, then your theory on Satguru questioning everything is false. Satguru taught the Brahmins the janeu was nothing more than a thread. Satguru taught many in a way where he would know the answer already to the question he was asking. This is not called questioning, but a teaching technique that is very effective. The question was only asked to help the lost soul recognize the divine and move past rituals. People like you and I ask questions to learn, but not Satguru as he is the teacher. You are not the only person who makes this mistake of saying Satguru questioned everything. Many Sikhs do this when they have their backs against the wall and want to prove their point.

But you sir, are not asking questions. Your questions are phrased in a way that makes you a bully. Its like when a bully says to a guy who has his glasses straight on his face.............why are your glasses broken.........why are they on the ground and not on your face..........Your behaviour reminds me of Richard Dawkins..........every religion is false...........he hasn't even gone indepth into all religions, but here he is claiming all religions are false. A piece of advice...........get a teacher that doesn't ask questions himself to find the subjective truth..........hes not even at the objective truth...........

Enjoy your day

[Only five]

Thats because i dont think Singhs want their Bibia to actually look like a Singh...unless of course they have homosexual tendencies.

There are two things wrong with this sentence. One is obvious and the other one is a subtle, but a huge mistake. It has to do with the word 'want' Singhs that are Singhs at heart won't want anything. Where their is a want, there is a lack of Akal Purakh in the Singhs heart. So Singhs won't want a Singhni with facial hair, but would marry a Singhni who follows rehat. If that happens to be this very bibi the whole Sikh world is talking about with facial hair that are very visible, then they wouldn't cry and say i have homosexual tendencies. Matter of fact they won't say i have heterosexual tendencies.

Since you might be one of these 'musclar heterosexual Singhs'....im a man!!!!...Im a man!!!!....mighty mighty musclar man........big chest = Singhni with no facial hair = bigger bicep. Then tell us where Satguru says hes heterosexual? Too much western thinking............too much whey protein............get to musclar heterosexual Singhs head

Just in case mods don't approve...........ill send you a pm of this post..........specially made for you sweetheart..... :wink2:

[MrDoaba]

There are two things wrong with this sentence. One is obvious and the other one is a subtle, but a huge mistake. It has to do with the word 'want' Singhs that are Singhs at heart won't want anything. Where their is a want, there is a lack of Akal Purakh in the Singhs heart. So Singhs won't want a Singhni with facial hair, but would marry a Singhni who follows rehat. If that happens to be this very bibi the whole Sikh world is talking about with facial hair that are very visible, then they wouldn't cry and say i have homosexual tendencies. Matter of fact they won't say i have heterosexual tendencies.

Since you might be one of these 'musclar heterosexual Singhs'....im a man!!!!...Im a man!!!!....mighty mighty musclar man........big chest = Singhni with no facial hair = bigger bicep. Then tell us where Satguru says hes heterosexual? Too much western thinking............too much whey protein............get to musclar heterosexual Singhs head

Just in case mods don't approve...........ill send you a pm of this post..........specially made for you sweetheart..... :wink2:

Only five Ji, your first point is actually very good, i'll give you that. Although you still havent changed my view but then again views can always change.

Your second point...no! I dont think like that nor do i take whey protein for that matter. And this "western thinking" rubbish is just not true. It has nothing to do with western thinking. Thats what people say when they dont really have anything productive to say.

All im saying is theres a point when when it becomes abnormal.

Where did Satguru say hes hetrosexual...where did he say hes not?? He didnt need to because its laws of kudrat!

[simran345]

I saw this too, and I looked at her eyes, she the most beautiful girl I have seen. And this is coming from someone who used to be paranoid about my face and how it looks...

She has definetely given me a lot of confidence on facial hair...i dont really care now if anybody can see my sideboards or my upperlip...she's an inspiration..., Also saw the comments people of non-Sikh origin left her, they were supporting her sooo much...and saying we should be happy with how God has made us, instead of looking like barbie dolls.

[akalinihang96]

Mods can delete the post as much as you like, your hypocrisy can never be deleted

[KhalistaniGunMan]

the panth is full of hypocrites...i will say it again ...very very few singhs supporting this bibi would actually take a wife who has excessive facial hair...keeping hiding behind religous rhetoric..behind this and that..but the truth is the truth...very few would do it...which ive happened to witness with my own eyes...holier than thou singhs telling bibia to keep very strict rehat concerning kes...but wont end marrying one ..its just a big joke

[Wingz23]

:respect: I CANNOT COMPARE :respect:

[Singh559]

the panth is full of hypocrites...i will say it again ...very very few singhs supporting this bibi would actually take a wife who has excessive facial hair...keeping hiding behind religous rhetoric..behind this and that..but the truth is the truth...very few would do it...which ive happened to witness with my own eyes...holier than thou singhs telling bibia to keep very strict rehat concerning kes...but wont end marrying one ..its just a big joke

Your problem is that you think supporting here equates whatever you're saying. Quit insulting her by making it out that Singhs are forcing her to keep her kesh. She did it on her own by hukam of Deshmesh Pita.