Jump to content

Can Hindu law cover Sikhs, Jains, asks SC: The Times of India


S4NGH
 Share

Recommended Posts

The comments in their reader's section are pathetic. I can ony say that "India as a country is not fit for democracy - Democracy as a way of governance has been too early an arrival to India - there is a long way to go and Indians have to learn/educate themselves a lot more before Democracy as a way of governance should have been adopted for India". A country/people of that country who have no realisation of rights/freedom of expression/views for any individual (leave apart a small/big community) is not fit for democracy.

Leave apart a community which says we are not Hindus, even an individual who says I am not a Hindu, must be respected, and should be allowed to choose his own identity irrespective of his nationality, and too be honest, this issue although a small issue, on other aspect, a very important issue as it hijakes somebody's unique identity.

The above para example is just 1 such instance of an issue, any individual right (leave apart a community right) has always been hijacked.

Some irritating comments -

Oh, this way, our unity will break, and we will have 1000s of divisions.

Why, won't everybody be an Indian? Did under Moghul rule, everybody was classified as Islamic Hindus or Moghul Hindus?

Guru Nanak was also a Hindu?

I won't comment on this comment, as I am sick and tired of hearing and replying to this comment, the only response I give now a days which shuts-up everybody is Was Shri Raam Chandra Jee/Lord Krishna also a Hindu, and can you explain meaning of word Hindu and when did Hinduism started?

Hinduism is a way of life, not a religion.

This is the most pathetic and illetrate comment.

Ok, I respect your way of life, but my way of life is different, it is Sikhism/Jainism/Buddhism.

Oh no, but Sikhism/Jainism/Buddhism are religions, but not way of life. Way of life is a super-set of religion, so way of life is Hinduism and Sikhism/Budhdhism/Jainism are religions under it.

No, for me, they are my way of life as well as my religion. I don't accept you as saying that your way of life is my way of life, why you want to hijack my identity/my way of life and don't give my proper identity rights to me. This way you are dictating your way of life on me, and not giving proper recognition to my identity. Isn't this Dictatorship? Where is the Democracy?

Oh No, this will create partition and break unity, we are all Hindus, but if you don't want to remain under the umbrealla Hinduism, YOU ARE A TERRORIST, F*** OFF.

I have posted all those responses to the Indiatimes Forum, none has been posted by Indiatimes Moderation Team.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
 Share

  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • yeh it's true, we shouldn't be lazy and need to learn jhatka shikaar. It doesn't help some of grew up in surrounding areas like Slough and Southall where everyone thought it was super bad for amrit dharis to eat meat, and they were following Sant babas and jathas, and instead the Singhs should have been normalising jhatka just like the recent world war soldiers did. We are trying to rectifiy this and khalsa should learn jhatka.  But I am just writing about bhog for those that are still learning rehit. As I explained, there are all these negative influences in the panth that talk against rehit, but this shouldn't deter us from taking khanda pahul, no matter what level of rehit we are!
    • How is it going to help? The link is of a Sikh hunter. Fine, but what good does that do the lazy Sikh who ate khulla maas in a restaurant? By the way, for the OP, yes, it's against rehit to eat khulla maas.
    • Yeah, Sikhs should do bhog of food they eat. But the point of bhog is to only do bhog of food which is fit to be presented to Maharaj. It's not maryada to do bhog of khulla maas and pretend it's OK to eat. It's not. Come on, bro, you should know better than to bring this Sakhi into it. Is this Sikh in the restaurant accompanied by Guru Gobind Singh ji? Is he fighting a dharam yudh? Or is he merely filling his belly with the nearest restaurant?  Please don't make a mockery of our puratan Singhs' sacrifices by comparing them to lazy Sikhs who eat khulla maas.
    • Seriously?? The Dhadi is trying to be cute. For those who didn't get it, he said: "Some say Maharaj killed bakras (goats). Some say he cut the heads of the Panj Piyaras. The truth is that they weren't goats. It was she-goats (ਬਕਰੀਆਂ). He jhatka'd she-goats. Not he-goats." Wow. This is possibly the stupidest thing I've ever heard in relation to Sikhi.
    • Instead of a 9 inch or larger kirpan, take a smaller kirpan and put it (without gatra) inside your smaller turban and tie the turban tightly. This keeps a kirpan on your person without interfering with the massage or alarming the masseuse. I'm not talking about a trinket but rather an actual small kirpan that fits in a sheath (you'll have to search to find one). As for ahem, "problems", you could get a male masseuse. I don't know where you are, but in most places there are professional masseuses who actually know what they are doing and can really relieve your muscle pains.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use