Jump to content

Kesri Lehar Early Day Motion 296 House of Commons UK


S4NGH
 Share

Recommended Posts

Why was the Minister allowed to speak (respond) 38 minutes into the debate and not hear the views and proposals of MPs before responding?

This is a departure from normal practice. Why did this happen?

Did India have something to with this or did MPs from all sides collude?

Just called Sikh Channel and mentioned this point and and point above.

This should not be 'brushed under the carpet'

Watch Quami Malse tomorrow 7-8pm

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Why was the Minister allowed to speak (respond) 38 minutes into the debate and not hear the views and proposals of MPs before responding?

This is a departure from normal practice. Why did this happen?

Did India have something to with this or did MPs from all sides collude?

Just called Sikh Channel and mentioned this point and and point above.

This should not be 'brushed under the carpet'

Watch Quami Malse tomorrow 7-8pm

Also called Kesri Lehar programme and raised same two questions - Paramjit Singh Sohal became very defensive - Kesri Lehar was not being criticised - the politicians were!

They took break and then Paranjit Singh Sohal attacked Dabinderjit Singh and Sikh Federation (UK) by name.

This then encouraged others to call and make negative comments.

No doubt Sangat TV will take some action.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Why was the Minister allowed to speak (respond) 38 minutes into the debate and not hear the views and proposals of MPs before responding?

This is a departure from normal practice. Why did this happen?

Did India have something to with this or did MPs from all sides collude?

Just called Sikh Channel and mentioned this point and and point above.

This should not be 'brushed under the carpet'

Watch Quami Malse tomorrow 7-8pm

In the debate the Minister ‘responded’ 39 minutes into the two and a half hour debate and did not hear the views and proposals of all MPs before he responded.

This is a departure from normal practice.

The Minister spoke at the end of the debate that followed on Thursday on the Kurdish Genocide 25 years ago.

Why did this not happen in the Abolition of the Death Penalty in India debate?

Did the Indian government have something to do with this and did MPs on all sides collude to allow the Minister to get away with taking this approach?

It looks as though keeping India happy is more important than responding to concerns expressed by constituents via their MPs and getting the UK Government to respon to proposals and questions.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
 Share

  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • yeh it's true, we shouldn't be lazy and need to learn jhatka shikaar. It doesn't help some of grew up in surrounding areas like Slough and Southall where everyone thought it was super bad for amrit dharis to eat meat, and they were following Sant babas and jathas, and instead the Singhs should have been normalising jhatka just like the recent world war soldiers did. We are trying to rectifiy this and khalsa should learn jhatka.  But I am just writing about bhog for those that are still learning rehit. As I explained, there are all these negative influences in the panth that talk against rehit, but this shouldn't deter us from taking khanda pahul, no matter what level of rehit we are!
    • How is it going to help? The link is of a Sikh hunter. Fine, but what good does that do the lazy Sikh who ate khulla maas in a restaurant? By the way, for the OP, yes, it's against rehit to eat khulla maas.
    • Yeah, Sikhs should do bhog of food they eat. But the point of bhog is to only do bhog of food which is fit to be presented to Maharaj. It's not maryada to do bhog of khulla maas and pretend it's OK to eat. It's not. Come on, bro, you should know better than to bring this Sakhi into it. Is this Sikh in the restaurant accompanied by Guru Gobind Singh ji? Is he fighting a dharam yudh? Or is he merely filling his belly with the nearest restaurant?  Please don't make a mockery of our puratan Singhs' sacrifices by comparing them to lazy Sikhs who eat khulla maas.
    • Seriously?? The Dhadi is trying to be cute. For those who didn't get it, he said: "Some say Maharaj killed bakras (goats). Some say he cut the heads of the Panj Piyaras. The truth is that they weren't goats. It was she-goats (ਬਕਰੀਆਂ). He jhatka'd she-goats. Not he-goats." Wow. This is possibly the stupidest thing I've ever heard in relation to Sikhi.
    • Instead of a 9 inch or larger kirpan, take a smaller kirpan and put it (without gatra) inside your smaller turban and tie the turban tightly. This keeps a kirpan on your person without interfering with the massage or alarming the masseuse. I'm not talking about a trinket but rather an actual small kirpan that fits in a sheath (you'll have to search to find one). As for ahem, "problems", you could get a male masseuse. I don't know where you are, but in most places there are professional masseuses who actually know what they are doing and can really relieve your muscle pains.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use