Jump to content

SADA HAQ MOVIE BANNED AGIAN


Recommended Posts

Sirsa is loaded and can stand tall in front of badal.

Those who felt little (ex. makkar) in front of badal clan are the only one who run away with tail tucked.

People like makkar should have learned some lessons from tohra on how to stand tall. (tohra got many mistakes and not capable of running sgpc but he had guts to keep badal away)

Sirsa got a standpoint and got no fear.

was narain-singh-chaura depicted as the older Singh in the film

Talvinder singh parmar maybe? I don't know who was narain singh chaura was.. who was he?

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • Replies 339
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Posts

Well the guy has done which no average Sikh ( mona or otherwise) has done. So please stop criticizing him for this. We need to support him

The Sant Samaj stated that they had over 30 members who were elected onto the SGPC as a result of supporting Akali Dal Badal. If correct then surely the 30 should come out in support of Sada Haq film

Posted Images

This interview seemed to have been recorded before the April 5, 2013 ban on the film. These comments seemed to have been made at the time when the picture was finally cleared for viewing with ‘U’ certificate by the Censor Board . Now that Badal has imposed the ban on the movie, what is Mr. Sirsa’s opinion now? And what is the opinion of SGPC now?

(Mr. Sirsa appears to be praising the SGPC in the interview for helping the producers with the Censor Board. Is he not aware of that Mr. Makkar said it was a mistake, and that he is never going to repeat that again )

  • Like 2
Link to post
Share on other sites

This interview seemed to have been recorded before the April 5, 2013 ban on the film. These comments seemed to have been made at the time when the picture was finally cleared for viewing with ‘U’ certificate by the Censor Board . Now that Badal has imposed the ban on the movie, what is Mr. Sirsa’s opinion now? And what is the opinion of SGPC now?

(Mr. Sirsa appears to be praising the SGPC in the interview for helping the producers with the Censor Board. Is he not aware of that Mr. Makkar said it was a mistake, and that he is never going to repeat that again )

To me it does not look like that. Why should he be asked about this especially when film had cleared censor board.

It looks like that interview is recent. Nobody knew much about this picture before the ban was clamped.

Link to post
Share on other sites

To me it does not look like that. Why should he be asked about this especially when film had cleared censor board.

It looks like that interview is recent. Nobody knew much about this picture before the ban was clamped.

It would be good to clarify when the interview took place. If it is after the ban then he is leader with guts and determination, something we really lack. If he has gone silent now , then that is not good after making that statement.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Related to events in the film.

Death Sentence verdict Prof Bhullar today.

http://timesofindia....ow/19504320.cms

NEW DELHI: The Supreme Court on Friday will pronounce the much-awaited verdict on the petition of condemned prisoner Devinderpal Singh Bhullar, who had sought commutation of his death penalty to life sentence on the ground that he underwent great agony for 11 years awaiting the President's decision on his mercy plea.

A bench of Justices G S Singhvi and S J Mukhopadhaya had heard elaborate arguments on three petitions - one by Bhullar, second by his wife Navneet Kaur and third by NGO 'Justice on Trial Trust'.

Apart from senior advocate K T S Tulsi, who appeared for Bhullar and Kaur, the bench had heard arguments from senior advocates Ram Jethmalani and T R Andhyarujina, who assisted the court as amicus. The court had reserved its verdict on April 19 last year.

The bench's decision on Bhullar's petition is likely to impact the petitions of 17 other condemned prisoners, who have approached the apex court in the meanwhile challenging the President's decision to reject their mercy pleas either on the ground that it was long delayed or the lack of procedure to deal with the mercy pleas.

Among the 17 are three awarded death for their role in Rajiv Gandhi's assassination, four associates of killed forest brigand Veerappan and nine others whose mercy pleas were rejected this month by the President. In all these 17 cases, the apex court has stayed execution of their death sentence.

Bhullar was handed down death penalty for his role in the bomb attack on then Youth Congress president M S Bitta in 1993 in which nine policemen were killed and 25 were injured including Bitta. Bhullar had pleaded for commutation of the death sentence on the ground that he had undergone imprisonment for 20 years which was akin to a life term and that he had lost mental equilibrium in the despairing 11-year wait.

His counsel had said that the fearful wait for such a long period, expecting to be hanged anytime, had a dehumanizing effect on the condemned prisoner making it a fit case for commutation of the capital sentence to life imprisonment.

The NGO, on the other hand, had complained that there was no procedure or time frame prescribed for the President to decide mercy pleas and requested the court to lay down broad parameters on this aspect.

Link to post
Share on other sites

It would be good to clarify when the interview took place. If it is after the ban then he is leader with guts and determination, something we really lack. If he has gone silent now , then that is not good after making that statement.

This is posted on youtube on April 11, 2013 and all comments are 5 to 7 hours old. Moreover he talks in past tense when saying " ih picture sikhan te jiadtian ujagar kardi si" Had the picture not been banned he would not have given this interview.

Link to post
Share on other sites

URGENT ACTION
EXECUTION IMMINENT AFTER PLEA REJECTED

The Supreme Court of India rejected the commutation plea of Devender Pal Singh Bhullar on 12 April. This verdict could affect the cases of at least 17 more prisoners.

Devender Pal Singh Bhullar was sentenced to death in August 2001 for his involvement in a bomb attack in New Delhi in 1993 that killed nine people. He was arrested at the New Delhi Airport in January 1995 under the Terrorist and Disruptive Activities (Prevention) Act (TADA), a law that subsequently lapsed, and contained provisions incompatible with international fair trial standards.

Devender Pal Singh Bhullar had no access to a lawyer during his initial detention and trial. He was found guilty on the basis of an unsubstantiated confession that he made to the police. He later retracted his statement, claiming it was made under police pressure. In March 2002, the Supreme Court upheld Devender Pal Singh Bhullars death sentence, though one of the three judges on the bench had found him not guilty, saying there was no evidence to convict him. A review petition was dismissed by the same Supreme Court judges, again by a 2 to 1 majority, in December 2002. Devender Pal Singh Bhullar Bhullar has been receiving treatment at a psychiatric facility in New Delhi and in 2011 his lawyer requested that the Supreme Court consider his mental ill-health as grounds for commuting his death sentence.

The President of India rejected Devender Pal Singh Bhullar's mercy petition in May 2011, eight years after the request was filed. Devender Pal Singh Bhullar challenged the decision before the Supreme Court, seeking commutation of his death sentence on the grounds of inordinate delay in its consideration and challenging the constitutionality of his prolonged stay on death row. The Supreme Court rejected his plea on 12 April. This decision is likely to affect at least 17 more prisoners whose mercy petitions have been rejected by the President.

Please write immediately in Hindi, English or your own language:

Calling upon the Indian government to not execute Devender Pal Singh Bhullar, to remove him from death row immediately, and retry his case in proceedings that comply with international fair trial standards.

Urging them to immediately halt any further executions, commute all death sentences to terms of imprisonment, and establish an official moratorium on executions with a view to abolishing the death penalty;

Reminding the Indian authorities that the UN General Assembly has repeatedly called for a moratorium on executions with a view to abolishing the death penalty, and pointing out that Indias decision to resume executions has set the country against regional and global trends towards abolition of the death penalty.

PLEASE SEND APPEALS BEFORE 24 MAY 2013 TO:

Prime Minister of India
Dr. Manmohan Singh
South Block, Raisina Hill
New Delhi 110001 India
Fax: +9111 2301 9545
Email: (via form)
http://pmindia.nic.in/feedback.htm
Salutation: Dear Prime Minister


President of India
Pranab Mukherjee
Rashtrapati Bhawan
New Delhi 110004 India
Fax: +9111 2301 7290
Email: (via form)
http://www.helpline.rb.nic.in
Salutation: Dear President Mukherjee



And copies to:
Minister of Home Affairs
Sushil Kumar Shinde
104 North Block
Central Secretariat
New Delhi 110001 India
Fax: +9111 2309 4221
Email: hm@nic.in
Salutation: Dear Minister

Attached Files
Link to post
Share on other sites

cant everybody flood sukhbir chand badal's facebook account in favour of SADDA HAQ

https://www.facebook.com/SukhbirSinghBadal?fref=ts

Won't help. I posted on his account about Professor Bhullar...they all got deleted and I got blocked. No point reaching out to those puppets.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...

  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I'll leave it at this Hanji. You need to contemplate precedent and slippery slope. I mean your mindset could be applied to anything.  Still have made no comment about covid immune people.  I mean why not mandate everything we deem beneficial? You're talking about signing up not only you, but everyone, for mandatory jabs for decades? And you don't think there's any room for error in that? Or malfeasance? In Kalyug? I don't want you have to close the thread or anything, we both want Sarbat Da Bhala, we just don't agree on this issue, and all other aspects of covid aside, mandatory anything, and the types of tactics we see being employed are not okay. 
    • NEWS - 2 DECEMBER 2021 12:59 Rishmeet Singh murder investigation: second arrest Detectives investigating the murder of 16-year-old Rishmeet Singh in Southall have made a second arrest. A 17-year-old boy [B] was arrested on suspicion of murder on Thursday, 2 December and remains in custody. A 19-year-old man [A] arrested on Tuesday, 30 November has been bailed to a date in late December. Rishmeet’s family have been updated on this development and continue to be supported by specially trained officers. https://news.met.police.uk/news/rishmeet-singh-murder-investigation-second-arrest-438747
    • https://news.met.police.uk/news/man-jailed-for-rape-in-canning-town-438564 NEWS - 30 NOVEMBER 2021 12:17 Man jailed for rape in Canning Town   A man who threatened a woman with a knife before raping her in Tower Hamlets has been jailed for 14 years. Bodor Ahmed, 27 (15.07.94), of Balmore Close, E14, was sentenced at Snaresbrook Crown Court on Tuesday, 30 November. He pleaded guilty to rape, threatening a person with a knife and sexual assault at the same court on 1 September 2020. At around 22:20hrs on 19 July 2020, Ahmed approached a 29-year-old woman who was walking along St Ives Place after leaving Canning Town Underground Station. He threatened her with a knife before forcing her into a residential property. Once inside the property, her raped and sexually assaulted her, despite repeated pleas from the victim for him to stop. Police were called by a member of the public who had seen Ahmed threaten the woman outside the building. Officers arrived and found the woman who was extremely distressed. They arranged specialist care for her. Ahmed attempted to get away through an underground car park, but was confronted by officers who were able to detain him. A large kitchen knife was found nearby. He was arrested and taken into custody before being charged the following day. Detective Constable Roberta Burkin, who worked on the investigation, said: "Ahmed's actions were absolutely appalling. He armed himself with a knife before carrying out an unprovoked attack on a defenceless woman for his own perverse gratification.
    • https://www.manchestereveningnews.co.uk/news/greater-manchester-news/sajjad-sultan-gay-village-courts-22324068 Vile sexual predator raped stranger as she tried to get home after night out in Gay Village - he'd been released from prison 11 days earlier She has been left traumatised by the horrendous ordeal, and has made multiple attempts to end her own life By Andrew BardsleyCourt reporter 08:51, 1 DEC 2021 UPDATED09:04, 1 DEC 2021 A devious sexual predator raped a total stranger as she tried to get home after a night out in the Gay Village. Sajjad Sultan, 26, had only been out of prison for 11 days before he attacked the woman, aged in her 20s. She had become separated from friends before Sultan, who had been hanging around Canal Street, pretended to be friendly to her. He put her arm round her and walked with her as she went to a taxi rank. Suddenly Sultan attacked her from behind in a dark canal towpath. She has been left traumatised by the horrendous ordeal, and has made multiple attempts to end her own life. Sajjad Sultan has been jailed for 15 years (Image: GMP)
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use