Jump to content

What Ranking Do You Give The Khalsa Empire In The 19Th Century


Recommended Posts

you can blame the dogra and everyone else who sold out and surrendered

sikhs also back stabbed for money and power and mahara of patalia was loyal to the afghans then british

both ango sikh wars the bengali and gorkha soldiers were the once who fought for the british against the sikhs but 1857 the sikhs

fought along side the gorkha soldiers and were loyal to the british instead of fighting for their empire back

after second anglo sikh war the sikhs coudl of refused any british laws used non corporation and guarila warfare

and used same tactics they did against afghans an mughals

Link to comment
Share on other sites

you can blame the dogra and everyone else who sold out and surrendered

sikhs also back stabbed for money and power and mahara of patalia was loyal to the afghans then british

both ango sikh wars the bengali and gorkha soldiers were the once who fought for the british against the sikhs but 1857 the sikhs

fought along side the gorkha soldiers and were loyal to the british instead of fighting for their empire back

after second anglo sikh war the sikhs coudl of refused any british laws used non corporation and guarila warfare

and used same tactics they did against afghans an mughals

And what are you trying to say here?

Is there any way we can change history?

We can only learn from it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

you can blame the dogra and everyone else who sold out and surrendered

Yes it's true the sellouts helped the British win

sikhs also back stabbed for money and power and mahara of patalia was loyal to the afghans then british

Yes just like KPS Gill and General Brar and Beanta

both ango sikh wars the bengali and gorkha soldiers were the once who fought for the british against the sikhs but 1857 the sikhs

fought along side the gorkha soldiers and were loyal to the british instead of fighting for their empire back

Wrong. If some Sikhs of the KPS Gill type fought with the British and a majority of the soldiers who fought with the British were Hindu+Muslim then it does not mean the true Khalsa Panth was with the British. The Khalsa Panth fights for entire humanity not any empire

after second anglo sikh war the sikhs coudl of refused any british laws used non corporation and guarila warfare

Sikhs did and were blown up in front of cannons as a result

and used same tactics they did against afghans an mughals

Sikhs did and that's why the figures are as below. The things u are saying are standard Hindutva propaganda against Sikhs. But the statistics speak for themselves

Sacrifices of Sikhs for India’s Freedom during British Empire:

Type

Sikhs

Non-Sikhs

Percentage of Sikhs

Prison One Year

1,550

575

73%

Hanged

93

28

77%

Jalianwala Bagh

799

501

61%

Bajj Bajj Ghaat

67

46

59%

Kooka Movement

91

0

100%

Akali Movement

500

0

100%

Deported

2,147

499

81%

Death sentence

92

35

72%

Indian National Army

12,000

8000

60%

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sacrifices of Sikhs for India’s Freedom during British Empire:

Type

Sikhs

Non-Sikhs

Percentage of Sikhs

Prison One Year

1,550

575

73%

Hanged

93

28

77%

Jalianwala Bagh

799

501

61%

Bajj Bajj Ghaat

67

46

59%

Kooka Movement

91

0

100%

Akali Movement

500

0

100%

Deported

2,147

499

81%

Death sentence

92

35

72%

Indian National Army

12,000

8000

60%

taking the entire sikh population at the time what percentage of the population was loyal to the british and what percentage fought against the british

if you add all the sikhs in the statistics you gave that comes to a total of under 20 000 sikhs that fought and their were 6 million sikhs in india in the 1930's

thats less then 1% of the total population

now how many sikhs fought in world war one and died over or under 20 000

how many sikhs fought for the british in 1857 rather then fighting for freedom for sikhs

and sikhs being blown up by cannons how many sikhs had bin blown up by cannans was it 100 or 1000 or 10 000

i don't know the number but i heard about this and would love to learn more about it

out of the entire population after the second anglo sikh war how many sikhs left the khalsa army and took up jobs as soldiers for british east india

i want to learn more about the sikhs struggle against the british and read some biography's of sikhs who lost their lives in the fight

against the british for india's freedom

why didn't the true khalsa panth continue fighting after second anglo british war and is their any stories to read about the once who did and used guirila warfare to try taking out the british

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Wahegurujikakhalsawahegurujikifateh

Armies led by Akaali Phoola Singh Ji or Sardar Hari Singh Nalwa Ji were simply undefeatable.

Those mahaan generals who led from the very front not only wielded the sarbloh sword but also the most potent weapon of all - the word of Satguru Sri Guru Nanak Dev Ji Maharaj.

Wahegurujikakhalsawahegurujikifateh

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
 Share


  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • yeh it's true, we shouldn't be lazy and need to learn jhatka shikaar. It doesn't help some of grew up in surrounding areas like Slough and Southall where everyone thought it was super bad for amrit dharis to eat meat, and they were following Sant babas and jathas, and instead the Singhs should have been normalising jhatka just like the recent world war soldiers did. We are trying to rectifiy this and khalsa should learn jhatka.  But I am just writing about bhog for those that are still learning rehit. As I explained, there are all these negative influences in the panth that talk against rehit, but this shouldn't deter us from taking khanda pahul, no matter what level of rehit we are!
    • How is it going to help? The link is of a Sikh hunter. Fine, but what good does that do the lazy Sikh who ate khulla maas in a restaurant? By the way, for the OP, yes, it's against rehit to eat khulla maas.
    • Yeah, Sikhs should do bhog of food they eat. But the point of bhog is to only do bhog of food which is fit to be presented to Maharaj. It's not maryada to do bhog of khulla maas and pretend it's OK to eat. It's not. Come on, bro, you should know better than to bring this Sakhi into it. Is this Sikh in the restaurant accompanied by Guru Gobind Singh ji? Is he fighting a dharam yudh? Or is he merely filling his belly with the nearest restaurant?  Please don't make a mockery of our puratan Singhs' sacrifices by comparing them to lazy Sikhs who eat khulla maas.
    • Seriously?? The Dhadi is trying to be cute. For those who didn't get it, he said: "Some say Maharaj killed bakras (goats). Some say he cut the heads of the Panj Piyaras. The truth is that they weren't goats. It was she-goats (ਬਕਰੀਆਂ). He jhatka'd she-goats. Not he-goats." Wow. This is possibly the stupidest thing I've ever heard in relation to Sikhi.
    • Instead of a 9 inch or larger kirpan, take a smaller kirpan and put it (without gatra) inside your smaller turban and tie the turban tightly. This keeps a kirpan on your person without interfering with the massage or alarming the masseuse. I'm not talking about a trinket but rather an actual small kirpan that fits in a sheath (you'll have to search to find one). As for ahem, "problems", you could get a male masseuse. I don't know where you are, but in most places there are professional masseuses who actually know what they are doing and can really relieve your muscle pains.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use