Jump to content
Sign in to follow this  
mrggg123

Why Are So Called Punjabi People So Voilent In Canada?

Recommended Posts

Why are they so violent ? Especially in places like Vancouver and even California. What is the root cause? Do they come from a certain area of Punjab?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Humans are essentially animals. Their response is mostly based on fear not love. Humans do have a capacity to rise above the animal part by choice of love.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Why are they so violent ? Especially in places like Vancouver and even California. What is the root cause? Do they come from a certain area of Punjab?

Did you know that California is in the US, not Canada?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Alot of Punjabi families, like most migrants to the west, have been here for a long time, over a century in BC/California, and like all migrants be they Irish, Italian, Japanese, they struggled and have become quite established, but there also comes the criminal mafia element. There are reputed gangs, and Punjabis are well known in the drug trade as well as other gangland type crimes, with that comes headlines of violence within the community.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Every group has their gangs and drug dealers in North America.

However, a lot of Punjabis of Sikh backgrounds living in Canada traditionally are blue collar folks who work labour and transportation type of jobs. So some of them decide to make a quick buck through drug trade or join gangs.

Another reason is lack of parental supervision due to parents being too busy at work (too busy working 12 hour shifts at local factory/warehouse) to take care their kids. So these kids end up having more time to hang out with others which eventually some of them hang out with wrong crowd.

Thirdly, a lot of Sikhs in Canada come from Jatt backgrounds (compare to UK & USA sikh community where it's more mix) which encourage to be like a "sher" and don't bow down anyone which causes a lot of fights.

Lastly, racism plays a role why Punjabis are violent due to their anger towards mainstream society and their racism towards Punjabi community.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Alot of Punjabi families, like most migrants to the west, have been here for a long time, over a century in BC/California, and like all migrants be they Irish, Italian, Japanese, they struggled and have become quite established, but there also comes the criminal mafia element. There are reputed gangs, and Punjabis are well known in the drug trade as well as other gangland type crimes, with that comes headlines of violence within the community.

The proportion of Californian and Canadian Sikhs who are descendants of Sikhs who arrived around 100 years ago is tiny and, in effect, negligible

I'd say well over 90% of Sikhs in California came during the 1980s or later.

In Canada, the large waves of migration started in the 70s

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Every group has their gangs and drug dealers in North America.

However, a lot of Punjabis of Sikh backgrounds living in Canada traditionally are blue collar folks who work labour and transportation type of jobs. So some of them decide to make a quick buck through drug trade or join gangs.

Another reason is lack of parental supervision due to parents being too busy at work (too busy working 12 hour shifts at local factory/warehouse) to take care their kids. So these kids end up having more time to hang out with others which eventually some of them hang out with wrong crowd.

Thirdly, a lot of Sikhs in Canada come from Jatt backgrounds (compare to UK & USA sikh community where it's more mix) which encourage to be like a "sher" and don't bow down anyone which causes a lot of fights.

Lastly, racism plays a role why Punjabis are violent due to their anger towards mainstream society and their racism towards Punjabi community.

The first generation of Sikhs in the UK mostly held blue collar jobs. While the first wave of Sikhs in the US were more professionally oriented, the Sikhs who have arrived in the US in the last 10-20 years are largely unpadh and hold blue collar jobs. So why is this gang problem only an issue in Canada?

Your "jatt" argument holds no weight either. There are lots of "bhappay" in the NYC area, but California is filled with jatts. While jatts form a smaller proportion of the UK Sikh population than they do of the Canadian Sikh population, the raw number of jatts in the UK over the years has probably been comparable to that in Canada.

So why is the gang violence just an issue in Canada?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The first generation of Sikhs in the UK mostly held blue collar jobs. While the first wave of Sikhs in the US were more professionally oriented, the Sikhs who have arrived in the US in the last 10-20 years are largely unpadh and hold blue collar jobs. So why is this gang problem only an issue in Canada?

Your "jatt" argument holds no weight either. There are lots of "bhappay" in the NYC area, but California is filled with jatts. While jatts form a smaller proportion of the UK Sikh population than they do of the Canadian Sikh population, the raw number of jatts in the UK over the years has probably been comparable to that in Canada.

So why is the gang violence just an issue in Canada?

we must find the root cause of this problem and tackle it. One good thing is no one messes with Sikhs in Canada, whereas they laugh at Sikhs in the uk and no1 says a thing.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The first generation of Sikhs in the UK mostly held blue collar jobs. While the first wave of Sikhs in the US were more professionally oriented, the Sikhs who have arrived in the US in the last 10-20 years are largely unpadh and hold blue collar jobs. So why is this gang problem only an issue in Canada?

Your "jatt" argument holds no weight either. There are lots of "bhappay" in the NYC area, but California is filled with jatts. While jatts form a smaller proportion of the UK Sikh population than they do of the Canadian Sikh population, the raw number of jatts in the UK over the years has probably been comparable to that in Canada.

So why is the gang violence just an issue in Canada?

In Canada, there's a lot of drugs (Mostly in BC where most of Sikh gangsters and dealers live in Canada) and big market to sell them to (US). The drug trade is very dangerous and usually results in violence. Sikhs in Canada play a big part of it since they control transportation/trucking industry in Canada that usually sneak drugs into US.

UK Sikh community is a lot more diverse than Canadian Sikh community. There's a huge chuck of non-Jatt Sikhs and non-Punjabi Sikhs in UK unlike Canada where vast majority of Sikhs come from rural Punjab. So our culture and values are different from each other.

Of course, racism is still an issue in Canada and usually South Asian (including Sikhs) tend to be in receive end of the racism these days in Canada.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

In Canada, there's a lot of drugs (Mostly in BC where most of Sikh gangsters and dealers live in Canada) and big market to sell them to (US). The drug trade is very dangerous and usually results in violence. Sikhs in Canada play a big part of it since they control transportation/trucking industry in Canada that usually sneak drugs into US.

UK Sikh community is a lot more diverse than Canadian Sikh community. There's a huge chuck of non-Jatt Sikhs and non-Punjabi Sikhs in UK unlike Canada where vast majority of Sikhs come from rural Punjab. So our culture and values are different from each other.

Of course, racism is still an issue in Canada and usually South Asian (including Sikhs) tend to be in receive end of the racism these days in Canada.

You made some good points in your first paragraph only to go back to your nonsensical "jatt" argument in the second paragraph.

The UK Sikh community is more diverse than the Canadian Sikh community. But there are more than enough jatts in the UK to cause trouble if all it takes is a substantial number of jatts

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
Sign in to follow this  



  • Topics

  • Posts

    • The love-hate dynamic perhaps stems from different sides. The middle-class, liberal-leaning Indian who has a cosmopolitan outlook on history views the Mughal era as a natural and unavoidable part of history where countries are conquered, and the conquerors leave imprints of their own culture on the natives, and therefore it's not something that is particularly objectionable. But then you have the nationalist or religiously inclined who view the Mughal conquest as a personal affront; a matter of a foreign force imposing its culture and religion on a population through compulsion and barbarism in part. Someone in the middle would appreciate the cultural value of what Mughals contributed to India while still acknowledging their destructive practices in how they managed to imprint their presence on a people and its culture through conquest.
    • at that time ALL gurdwaraey used jot for lighting   , some punjabis are so dense ... It is more important to have nagara than shank anyhow . Brahmins did their utmost to reinstate their prejudical treatment of folks when they became willing MAHANTS under British raj   and also brought murtian of debtey (the ones that were brought into harmandir Sahib ended up in durgiana mandir I heard .) That is why Bhai Sahib Randhir Singh did morcha against the people running harmandir sahib preventing 'low caste ' sikhs from getting degh or giving degh for blessing. then you had Saka Nankana sahib and saka Guru ka Bagh .  They've been trying since time of Guru Nanak Dev ji to subvert our panth.
    • didn't the brahmins enslave the mulnivasis too and use their labour to build their temples too? this is the way of the world . The architecture was  not particular to the turks but actually adopted by them from the nation of Persia so what you see in Punjab's reaction  is just an appreciation of the artwork and skill of the kaligars  but shared history of trade .  Shah Jahan married Mumtaz's sister , Mumtaz died in childbirth 14th I think  she  was his second wife anyhow.
    • hiv aids was a zoonotic virus from green monkeys' kidneys used to incubate vaccine antibodies for the polio vaccines  this is an issue which was known by Dr Salk but he helped covered over the fact of contaminated batches, the ame process carried on , so there was a whole generation exposed to this danger .
    • Yh that annoyed me when I saw it at the fort at anandpur sahib. Why would a 17th century fort have a khanda on it lol. I think older generation wouldn't be happy with a lot of puratan stuff. Sikh leaders in the last century almost became bhramin phobic and any practise or tradition which remotely reminded them of hinduism they wiped it out.  Its one of the reasons why dasam bani got shoved to the side.  Just like how the post that I posted about mansha singh, about him lighting jot at harmandir sahib and then sikhs questioning it because it's a bhaman practise.  The war banners of the khalsa army during majaraja ranjit singhs time used to have kali mata and other war goddesses on it, imagine bringing that back today! It would cause a riot lmao.  Couple of years back old wall paintings at tarn taran darbar sahib of hindu mythology were whitewashed and painted over with sikh ithiaasic scenes.  My told me that in the local gurdwara when she was a kid they used to have a shankh shell in the gurdwara.  These images were symbols of war, nothing more.  Not that your average sikh cared, but leaders didnt want sikhi to be seen as a sect of hindu dharam  which is understandable especially with all the events in the first half of the last century.  Theres even a sikh flag from maharaja ranjit singhs time with hanuman on it. But younger people are less "insecure" about these things.  
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use