Jump to content

Men Exploited Vulnerable Sikh Teenager, Leicester Court Told (Moghul Darbar Case)


taran0
 Share

Recommended Posts

People can say what they want. The way I see it is the girl was vulnerable, and she was taken advantage of by diry scum muslims mainly. IF she were a muslim they would have helped her, becuase she is a Sikh they raped her ! This is the thinking of our " Asian Brothers" !

What do you think our Guru would expect us to do about this. when the shaibzada were murdered, they were avenged by Sikhs.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This is why the likes of Keith Vaz won't help the Sikh Community as the Labour Party is infiltrated by paedophiles. The Labour Party lacks the courage to root out this evil, once again why did the Police prosecute the Sikhs who stopped the abuse in continuing.

Vote UKIP do not vote Lib\Lab\Con

No dont think labour party is infiltrated by paedophiles lol. It's infiltrated by the gay lobby (peter mandalson and others), by capitalists like Keith vaz who has connection with corrupt politicians and businessmen from India (ie the billionaire hinduja brothers). Labour has been infiltrated by war criminals posing as socialists like tony blair and his zionest coherts (banking financiers) and its infiltrated by islamic fundamentalist MP's like sadiq khan and others and its infiltrated by the feminists extremists like harriet harmen (who hates men and fathers rights).

New labour party is toxic cocktail of nastyness and nothing of the sort of what old labour party was that had a true vision and true alliance the with the working class. The New Labour pary lost the plot and last election because of all the foreign wars (state terrorism illegal wars), the sharp increase in CCTV state survillence and monitoring given to military intelligence agencies against freedom and human rights, the tuition uni fee's introduction and increase, the introduction of draconian anti-free speech anti-freedom fighting laws that made people criminals simply for having a different opinion because someone found their comment offensive or supporting a armed group fighting for its freedom from an oppressor state (ie india).

So in all the labour party should be best avoid if someone has true intelligence. Rather than vote UKIP or Tories. Sikhs should look at forming their own party or creating cross party voting blocks/lobby where they can influence British politics like jewish and gay lobby have done.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

first of all ill say sorry because im sure pappu sikhs will get offended...what p's me off most is whenwe blatently know these muslim are exploiting women for their own needs,sexually, and still we eco equality... what we need to understand is they are doing this in the name of islam....brainwashed by some sadistic ideology....if this was just the perpatrator then fair enough as he is sick, but when their own fathers justify their action its definantly something to worry about...for those questioning what i have said please watch bbc documentary where the muslim father is clearly justifying his sons actions of exploiting ayoung girl(legally convicted)..the father claimed the young girl asked for it as she wore short skirts......if my son ever done the same to another girl, even if she was a muslim ibwould personally chop his head off... shere punjab backed the cause back in the day and our so called religious leaders did not back it..it was never as bad as this back in the day...this is no comparison but understand the point, guru hargobind was the first sikh guru to cary arms and use force...even the sikhs at the time doubted him as a guru as he used weopens in self defenfe and cut agyan...fateh

Link to comment
Share on other sites

please listen and share and please read below a witness statement from a girl groomed in the Oxford case describing how they work.

this radio 2 programme by Jeremy vine discusses the issues of grooming gangs and a Muslim imam taj hargey gives an interesting viewpoint.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=i4zoOCeA7vc&feature=youtube_gdata_player

Eyewitness statement from Girl C (Oxford Grooming Case - 12 years old when first approached)

The grooming was so clever, it takes about one year then its too late, youre completely under their control. At first they treat you like a princess, they make you feel wanted cared for and ask you about your life and family. They buy you gifts and make you the centre of their attention that goes on for around 6 months, by which time you have told them so much that they know exactly what to say to get under your skin. Slowly they turn you against your family. I was so wrapped up in them that I believed what they told me without questioning it. I thought they were so wise that they knew everything. I thought they were the only people I could trust. When you are dependent on them emotionally they tie you even closer with drugs and alcohol.

The next stage happens when youre completely dependent on them. They begin flicking between being attentive and then being suddenly rude and aggressive. It took 6 months for sex with one person to start. The man who TARGETTED me said he Loved me. But soon the switch flicked and he started saying things like. "You have to sleep with other men for me because of all the things I have bought for you and done for you". By that time the threats and the violence became explicit, you know that refusing them will be really dangerous. But by that point it doesnt occur to you to refuse, your too much of a zombie, your completely at their mercy.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

People can say what they want. The way I see it is the girl was vulnerable, and she was taken advantage of by diry scum muslims mainly. IF she were a muslim they would have helped her, becuase she is a Sikh they raped her ! This is the thinking of our " Asian Brothers" !

What do you think our Guru would expect us to do about this. when the shaibzada were murdered, they were avenged by Sikhs.

hit the nail on the head brother

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
 Share


  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • yeh it's true, we shouldn't be lazy and need to learn jhatka shikaar. It doesn't help some of grew up in surrounding areas like Slough and Southall where everyone thought it was super bad for amrit dharis to eat meat, and they were following Sant babas and jathas, and instead the Singhs should have been normalising jhatka just like the recent world war soldiers did. We are trying to rectifiy this and khalsa should learn jhatka.  But I am just writing about bhog for those that are still learning rehit. As I explained, there are all these negative influences in the panth that talk against rehit, but this shouldn't deter us from taking khanda pahul, no matter what level of rehit we are!
    • How is it going to help? The link is of a Sikh hunter. Fine, but what good does that do the lazy Sikh who ate khulla maas in a restaurant? By the way, for the OP, yes, it's against rehit to eat khulla maas.
    • Yeah, Sikhs should do bhog of food they eat. But the point of bhog is to only do bhog of food which is fit to be presented to Maharaj. It's not maryada to do bhog of khulla maas and pretend it's OK to eat. It's not. Come on, bro, you should know better than to bring this Sakhi into it. Is this Sikh in the restaurant accompanied by Guru Gobind Singh ji? Is he fighting a dharam yudh? Or is he merely filling his belly with the nearest restaurant?  Please don't make a mockery of our puratan Singhs' sacrifices by comparing them to lazy Sikhs who eat khulla maas.
    • Seriously?? The Dhadi is trying to be cute. For those who didn't get it, he said: "Some say Maharaj killed bakras (goats). Some say he cut the heads of the Panj Piyaras. The truth is that they weren't goats. It was she-goats (ਬਕਰੀਆਂ). He jhatka'd she-goats. Not he-goats." Wow. This is possibly the stupidest thing I've ever heard in relation to Sikhi.
    • Instead of a 9 inch or larger kirpan, take a smaller kirpan and put it (without gatra) inside your smaller turban and tie the turban tightly. This keeps a kirpan on your person without interfering with the massage or alarming the masseuse. I'm not talking about a trinket but rather an actual small kirpan that fits in a sheath (you'll have to search to find one). As for ahem, "problems", you could get a male masseuse. I don't know where you are, but in most places there are professional masseuses who actually know what they are doing and can really relieve your muscle pains.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use