Jump to content

Can Sangat Report The Blog, Its So Hateful


navsangeet
 Share

Recommended Posts

Obviously I am in the wrong place ......................but I can still hope that there will be a re-conciliation one day between the hurt Sikhs and the rest of Indian society.

Aint gonna happen until Indians change their mentality.... India is a place where person like Indra is called " iron lady" and peace prize is given under her name... We are happy with our Punjab... Sikhs have done enough for Indians and what have we got in return?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sikhs are Punjabi not Indian. Sikhism began in Nankana Sahib which is in Punjab and Khalsa was created in Anandpur Sahib which is also in Punjab.

Nonsense.

Sikhs are Sikhs; and that is that.

Don't try to drag disgusting muslim punjabi culture into Sikhi.

Sikhi is DISTINCT.

We have our own clear, unambiguous PURE KHALSA CULTURE given to us by Dasven Patshah, Walia Do Jahaan, Sarbans Daani, Sahib Sri Guru Gobind Singh Ji Maharaj.

We can inhabit any part of the world, including any part of India, and remain unambiguously SIKH; NOT panjaabi, indian, white, brown, black, british, american, european, purple, with blue spots, or any other inconsequential label you can think of.

Sikhs are SIKHS; and that's the end of the matter.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sikhs are Punjabi not Indian. Sikhism began in Nankana Sahib which is in Punjab and Khalsa was created in Anandpur Sahib which is also in Punjab.

Two of our five Takhts are in India, outside of East Panjaab. Our Tenth Master were born in East India. Our Gurus were fluent in many of the Indian languages, including hindi. Much of Gurbani has been revealed through variants of the Indian language hindi, although formed in Gurmukhi script, and not in punjabi at all.

See where this is going?

What does it prove?

Answer: Nothing.

Does it even matter?

Answer: Not at all.

Why?

Well, because Sikhi is completely INDEPENDENT of all geographic boundaries and cultures.

Sikhi cannot be tied down to one corner of the world as opposed to the other.

Sikhi is a way of life; a way of thinking; a way of death; that can be applied no matter whether you are an Inewit in Alaska, or a farmer in Africa.

Physical limitations don't matter to us. We are beyond them.

Please don't try to limit Sikhi to one region.

Please remember one thing Singh.

Sikhi is NOT equivalent to panjaab.

Sikhi is UNIVERSAL, janaab :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yes, unfortunately, I had to read it.

The article can be described as the very definition of hate speech.

Pure vitriol.

__________________________________________________________________

As far as I can speak for myself, I have reported the article.

Credit where credit is due, to google blogspot; it is very easy to do.

Simply

1. Go to google's report "Hate speech, violent or

crude content on Blogger" page at https://support.google.com/blogger/answer/82111?hl=en

2. Copy the url of the article from post #1

2. Paste it into the field provided at the boutin of the page and hit submit.

And that's it.

I encourage everyone who reads this to do the same.

It is outrageous that the said hate article is still being hosted by google on it's servers, and it will only be taken down if it receives a barrage of complaints in disgust.

It only takes a few seconds to report the page so I again encourage everyone who reads this to do it.

Thank you.

i reported it Veerji....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It''s sad that Sikhs have to go to these western countries in the first place. Why can't we build a good homeland, and don't say it's purely due to Indian oppression.

We have one of the worst sex ratios in India an the worst alcohol/drug problem.

The main reason why Sikhs and others leave is money. For example the minimum wage here in Australia is $16.37 an hour which equates just over 950 Rupees an hour. They just can't compete in Punjab and other areas of India.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
 Share

  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • yeh it's true, we shouldn't be lazy and need to learn jhatka shikaar. It doesn't help some of grew up in surrounding areas like Slough and Southall where everyone thought it was super bad for amrit dharis to eat meat, and they were following Sant babas and jathas, and instead the Singhs should have been normalising jhatka just like the recent world war soldiers did. We are trying to rectifiy this and khalsa should learn jhatka.  But I am just writing about bhog for those that are still learning rehit. As I explained, there are all these negative influences in the panth that talk against rehit, but this shouldn't deter us from taking khanda pahul, no matter what level of rehit we are!
    • How is it going to help? The link is of a Sikh hunter. Fine, but what good does that do the lazy Sikh who ate khulla maas in a restaurant? By the way, for the OP, yes, it's against rehit to eat khulla maas.
    • Yeah, Sikhs should do bhog of food they eat. But the point of bhog is to only do bhog of food which is fit to be presented to Maharaj. It's not maryada to do bhog of khulla maas and pretend it's OK to eat. It's not. Come on, bro, you should know better than to bring this Sakhi into it. Is this Sikh in the restaurant accompanied by Guru Gobind Singh ji? Is he fighting a dharam yudh? Or is he merely filling his belly with the nearest restaurant?  Please don't make a mockery of our puratan Singhs' sacrifices by comparing them to lazy Sikhs who eat khulla maas.
    • Seriously?? The Dhadi is trying to be cute. For those who didn't get it, he said: "Some say Maharaj killed bakras (goats). Some say he cut the heads of the Panj Piyaras. The truth is that they weren't goats. It was she-goats (ਬਕਰੀਆਂ). He jhatka'd she-goats. Not he-goats." Wow. This is possibly the stupidest thing I've ever heard in relation to Sikhi.
    • Instead of a 9 inch or larger kirpan, take a smaller kirpan and put it (without gatra) inside your smaller turban and tie the turban tightly. This keeps a kirpan on your person without interfering with the massage or alarming the masseuse. I'm not talking about a trinket but rather an actual small kirpan that fits in a sheath (you'll have to search to find one). As for ahem, "problems", you could get a male masseuse. I don't know where you are, but in most places there are professional masseuses who actually know what they are doing and can really relieve your muscle pains.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use