Jump to content

Pakistanis Claiming Their Ancestors Were Sikh.. Need The Truth


mrggg123
 Share

Recommended Posts

Right now, a mere 100,000 American Troops are literally dominating Afghanistan - nation of 25 million.

lol, what?

Americans can't even protect Kabul, let alone "dominate" kabul, and let alone "dominating" entire Afghanistan....

100,000 troops are too less to dominate a country like Afghanistan....

As of now, American defeat is glaring in Afghan-war.

Hundreds of billions spend, thousands of allied casualities, majority of Afghanistan still under Taliban control, Taliban continously attacking Kabul, American forces and son, Karzai government fragile, instead of curbing down terrorist threat...terrorist threat spread all over the world with Al Qaeda and affiliates hitting London, Moscow, Madrid, Syria, Yemen, Mali, Pakistan and so on....

As America withdraws, Talibans' triumph over Karzai look apparent....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Your ancestors also conquored modern day Syria under the Mittani Empire.

Sorry veer, but my taaya jee came to Dubai only in 1976. No one in my entire family has ever been to Syria. Not sure which ancestors you're referring to bro :D

As America withdraws, Talibans' triumph over Karzai look apparent....

Whats next? Ghazwa-E-Hind? ;)
Link to comment
Share on other sites

He would have to be a Hindu as Islam arrived in India much before Sahib Sri Guru Nanak Dev Patshah Jee Maharaj. Sikhs converting to Islam back in those days is something exactly opposite to what even Islamic historians have written. Even they have recorded that Sikhs prefer to die than abandon their faith.

Probably, but as I said, "Sikhs and Hindus" are used inter-convertably by many Punjabis...

I agree though, most probably a Hindu...but we don't know when that conversion happened...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I've never met a Pakistani Punjabi who thinks Sikhs and Hindus are the same. The three communities have been living with each other for centuries and know the difference between the two. Sikhs are monotheistic, Hindus are not. Sikhs have turbans and beards, Hindus do not.

Not same, but used as "inter-convertably" when refering to the non-Muslims of Punjabi land...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Here is something I would like to share.

I remember having heard from my father ( My father is no more ) a long time back that:

A big number of wealthy influential and common Sikhs in the region of present Pakistan had indeed converted to Islam in big numbers. And the main reason being the internal quarrels and infightings.

btw: Try to find out who were the ancestors of Bollywood actor Sharukh Khan !!! It wont be a surprise if they too were Sikhs. Indeed, I did hear this too. Not sure 100% !

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Here is something I would like to share.

I remember having heard from my father ( My father is no more ) a long time back that:

A big number of wealthy influential and common Sikhs in the region of present Pakistan had indeed converted to Islam in big numbers. And the main reason being the internal quarrels and infightings.

btw: Try to find out who were the ancestors of Bollywood actor Sharukh Khan !!! It wont be a surprise if they too were Sikhs. Indeed, I did hear this too. Not sure 100% !

Interesting...Never heard of this before...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I've never met a Pakistani Punjabi who thinks Sikhs and Hindus are the same. The three communities have been living with each other for centuries and know the difference between the two. Sikhs are monotheistic, Hindus are not. Sikhs have turbans and beards, Hindus do not.

It was in fact the islamic colonialism of india which inunciated this EXTREME us and them mentality.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
 Share


  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • yeh it's true, we shouldn't be lazy and need to learn jhatka shikaar. It doesn't help some of grew up in surrounding areas like Slough and Southall where everyone thought it was super bad for amrit dharis to eat meat, and they were following Sant babas and jathas, and instead the Singhs should have been normalising jhatka just like the recent world war soldiers did. We are trying to rectifiy this and khalsa should learn jhatka.  But I am just writing about bhog for those that are still learning rehit. As I explained, there are all these negative influences in the panth that talk against rehit, but this shouldn't deter us from taking khanda pahul, no matter what level of rehit we are!
    • How is it going to help? The link is of a Sikh hunter. Fine, but what good does that do the lazy Sikh who ate khulla maas in a restaurant? By the way, for the OP, yes, it's against rehit to eat khulla maas.
    • Yeah, Sikhs should do bhog of food they eat. But the point of bhog is to only do bhog of food which is fit to be presented to Maharaj. It's not maryada to do bhog of khulla maas and pretend it's OK to eat. It's not. Come on, bro, you should know better than to bring this Sakhi into it. Is this Sikh in the restaurant accompanied by Guru Gobind Singh ji? Is he fighting a dharam yudh? Or is he merely filling his belly with the nearest restaurant?  Please don't make a mockery of our puratan Singhs' sacrifices by comparing them to lazy Sikhs who eat khulla maas.
    • Seriously?? The Dhadi is trying to be cute. For those who didn't get it, he said: "Some say Maharaj killed bakras (goats). Some say he cut the heads of the Panj Piyaras. The truth is that they weren't goats. It was she-goats (ਬਕਰੀਆਂ). He jhatka'd she-goats. Not he-goats." Wow. This is possibly the stupidest thing I've ever heard in relation to Sikhi.
    • Instead of a 9 inch or larger kirpan, take a smaller kirpan and put it (without gatra) inside your smaller turban and tie the turban tightly. This keeps a kirpan on your person without interfering with the massage or alarming the masseuse. I'm not talking about a trinket but rather an actual small kirpan that fits in a sheath (you'll have to search to find one). As for ahem, "problems", you could get a male masseuse. I don't know where you are, but in most places there are professional masseuses who actually know what they are doing and can really relieve your muscle pains.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use