Jump to content
Sign in to follow this  
Questioner

Meaning Of This Line?

Recommended Posts

VJKK VJKF

Please help me to understand the meaning of the last part of the Bani:

gourree kabeer jee ||
Gauree, Kabeer Jee:
jaa kai har saa t(h)aakur bhaaee ||
One who has the Lord as his Master, O Siblings of Destiny
mukath ana(n)th pukaaran jaaee ||1||
- countless liberations knock at his door. ||1||
ab kahu raam bharosaa thoraa ||
If I say now that my trust is in You alone, Lord,
thab kaahoo kaa kavan nihoraa ||1|| rehaao ||
then what obligation do I have to anyone else? ||1||Pause||
theen lok jaa kai hehi bhaar ||
He bears the burden of the three worlds;
so kaahae n karai prathipaar ||2||
why should He not cherish you also? ||2||
kahu kabeer eik budhh beechaaree ||
Says Kabeer, through contemplation, I have obtained this one understanding.
kiaa bas jo bikh dhae mehathaaree ||3||22||
If the mother poisons her own child, what can anyone do? ||3||22||

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

WJKK WJKF,

Bhagat Kabeer Ji is telling us to trust in Waheguru 100% and Waheguru alone. It is not possible to trust humanity as much as Waheguru. There is no instance where Waheguru will not let you down. Humans are fallible therefore Bhagat Ji is explaining that even in the instance where a mother (whom we would trust 100% with our lives) may poison her own child then who can we trust?

The answer is trust in Waheguru, he is our creator and caretaker.

(Poison doesn't just have to be poison ingested through the mouth. Poison could be not teaching Gurmat and steering the child away from Guru Ji or filling the mind with wicked thoughts)

Hope this helps, bhul chuk maaf.

WJKK WJKF

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The rahao line -

thab kaahoo kaa kavan nihoraa ||1|| rehaao ||
then what obligation do I have to anyone else? ||1||Pause||
Why would or should we need another besides the ONE lord that is ?
Paying attention to this and the direction of the whole shabad, I feel that it is saying that how or why should we feel HELPLESS ?
Near the end Kabir ji says-
kahu kabeer eik budhh beechaaree || (says Kabir, consider this Budhi or example of wisdom)
Says Kabeer, through contemplation, I have obtained this one understanding

I think that the last line is not saying that we should NOT trust or have faith in other humans- because sikhi tells us to Love and respect all whilst being humble and lower than them.

BUT, this line is saying that IF we have faith in another besides the ONE lord, then we SHALL be HELPLESS just like the child that gets poisoned by the mother!

Therefore, we should have Faith in ONLY the ONE LORD and No other. AS he is the ONE that won't leave us feeling helpless.

In effect, I don't think the shabad is comparing how we have faith for humans compared to God, but I think it is comparing that we should have faith for the ONE GOD only and NO other God or deity !- since he is the maker of the universe and 3 worlds and takes all responsibility.

I

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you!

I thought that by Mother, Bhagat ji was referring to God, and us as His children. Which is a confusing prospect. But what you guys are saying makes sense. Is there any katha or story behind this shabad?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
Sign in to follow this  



  • Topics

  • Posts

    • The fact that this guy threw away his political career in order to marry her is example number 72,602,308 of how desperate singhs have become. (If you want to call this "trim singh" a "singh".) How thirsty and pathetic can one be? I have noticed a trend of somewhat successful singhs gladly settling down with women who few other people want (because of a tarnished reputation, or because they are way past their "sell-by" date, etc.). Usually, when these women were younger and in demand, they would have never considered a singh. But after it becomes obvious that they are struggling to settle down (because of their various issues) and are getting old, they are happy to settle for a simp with a pagh as long as he has some status/money.   This Bola guy probably thought to himself: "I wear a turban (and can't do a decent job tying it), and I am overweight and kind of ugly. But somehow a girl is talking to me! Isn't this amazing?! I should marry her!! Who cares if it kills my career? It will totally be worth it!!!"
    • 1. She looks much worse these days with her hair cut shorter 2. This whole story is really depressing. THREE thirsty Singhs basically had their lives ended or ruined. THREE thirsty Singhs. The real story is how desperate many Singhs are. I can't decide which of the three Singhs in the story is the most pathetic. 3. I'm not sure what to believe, but it seems like a real tragedy in any case 4. There is no excusing the behavior of Gagandip Singh and Harinder Shoker. But is it wrong to point out that they probably wouldn't have sunk to such depths if they weren't so thirsty and desperate for women? It reminds me of those stories of incel white kids going crazy and killing people. 
    • Probably people who live in areas with relatively large numbers of Sikhs (near a major gurdwara, for instance). But in general, I'd say educated whites are the most likely to have an awareness of Sikhs.
    • No (unless they live near the White Sikh headquarters in New Mexico).   While Sikhs are a tiny minority compared to Punjabi Sikhs. Most of the white Sikhs are people who were hippies in the 60s and 70s when eastern spirituality was a big thing and they somehow came into contact with "yogi" Harbhajan Singh or other white Sikhs. As far as I am aware, white Sikhs are not really passing Sikhi on successfully to their children/grandchildren. Once that old generation is gone, white Sikhs will probably have an even more negligible presence.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use