Jump to content

Being Proud To Be Indian


Big_Tera
 Share

Recommended Posts

Yes good post username1. We don't want to deny our pre Sikh history like the Pakistanis. Most of the Indus Valley civilisation is in Pakistan yet they barely mention it because it isn't Islamic. The reason why Pakistani punjabis dislike speaking in Punjabi is because it predates Islam's arrival in India.

At the end of the day Sikhi does have a lot of similarities with Hinduism. The whole idea of reincarnation, meditation and the aim of breaking the circle of life and death. However, I think over time Hinduism got away from the original message, it became exclusive to high caste people, the people began to worship holy men (like Krishna) instead of the one god etc. That is why I believe Guru Nanak was sent, to show people the right path again.

However it's a shame that there is still so much caste discrimination amongst Sikhs.

You also get a lot of Sikhs who are anti Hindi at all costs, yet so much of bani is in Hindi!

Thanks for the appreciation. As for punjabi some muslims claim they invented it (spoken not script- they used shahmukhi script), that people like Sheikh Farid were the first writers of it and the use of arabic and persian in punjabi is justification for why punjabi was their innovation before Sikh ripped off their language with their sufism and turned it against them.

I think we have to appreciate what happens when we deny the past, we can re-produce Afghanistan like environments. The dark ages took place in the west simply right after christianity had become successfully in destroying the past from the minds of people. Long forgotten where the names of plato, aristotle and Socrates. The renaissance thrived when their names, their works came back. While the dark ages took place, some of the middle east started to grow in economy through it's sciences from the works of such greek and other persian philosophers, the remnants of the once proud Zoroastrian nation.

It's not a secret, Pakistan is a mess and doesn't have it's house in order. The last thing we want is to become anything like them, while they are off chasing a imaginary dream of emulating the most perfect man (lol), to create the most perfect nation they are actually going backwards in terms of international standards. Places like Japan and Brazil are going forwards. South America is rediscovering it's aztec past and the western world is rediscovering it's Roman, Greek and Norse pasts.

India as it is seems to be the lands of which the Vedas were prevalent. It also compromises of the nations Aurangzeb conquered. It also seems to be mentioned in other ancient Hindu/Indian literature. Gurbani isn't exactly in Hindi, gurbani compromises of many languages which were all incorporated into the standards of forming gurmukhi punjabi. The Sikh gurus standardized punjabi aswell.

I don't think a true Sikh can be against one specific language but against losing their own. Part of the political struggles facing punjab is removing punjabi as a public arena language, demeaning punjabi to a backwards tongue while praising hindi as a sophisticated tongue (even though it came from a rural community aswell). The laymen of geographical regions however tend to seek one language and from the central government there is a pressure to eradicate local dialects in a bid to unify india under a more central culture. In Maharashtra, Maharatis are very proud of their language and I doubt they want to see Maharati replaced with hindi.

Here is a map of Aurangzeb's empire: (here are a series of maps which relate to various mughals their expansion and shrinkage of empires http://www.columbia.edu/itc/mealac/pritchett/00maplinks/mughal/roolvinkset/roolvinkset.html )

map3max.jpg

Much before Aurangzeb is King Ashoka's empire from 250 BC Source (http://www.columbia.edu/itc/mealac/pritchett/00maplinks/early/ashoka/ashoka.html

)

joppenmax.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

before 1984

or after, The punjabi language I speak ive inherited from My Grandparents who were born before partition. Their villages had Sikhs Hindus and Muslims (muslims are now in Pakistan)..

The Sikhs Hindus stayed behind. That style of Punjabi is not understood by our Hindu Veers from South or East of India. When we had relatives over the men sat in one room women in another. Its neither good or bad, yet different. The Style of Punjabiat my Forebears follow they say a word and stand by it till their blue in the face or dead. Some call it a generation thing, but i see the same in my uncles who are not even into Sikhi.

It does not mean i consider myself special or higher. We love and respect everyone. But that the Reeht Rivaaz rehni behni we have is different from other States. I do not feel i am better at anything or less. In fact I have relativees in Delhi Haryana Chandigarh Rishikesh and Dehra Doon, so its not like we are uneducated in how others live. There is affinity with certain folk. But i would say more farkh. It does not have to be negative.

Due to the imprint of Punjabi asool in my family, that influence stands out stronger than anything else even after 4 generations in UK> I would say Im Punjabi British. I have no disregard for India or its people, we lovingly embrace everyone. I would love to discover Tamil East Indian Assamese Maharashtran rajahstani Nepalese culture and history.. But that does not mean i am Nepalese or Assamese or gujrati.

Maybe its because most of our families came from Old School Punjab straight into aa WHite Mans land without Nationalist Feelings for India as a whole i dont knoww. But its enough to say some like Nationalism Inclusiveness others are happy as they are and it dont mean we have differences burning inside.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I am talking about being proud of Indian culture, food, music. I am not talking about being proud of politicians and government atrocities. that is a completely separate issue and is plain obvious that no is going to be proud of that. Are you suggesting we should be more proud of being British?

Sikhs are very well represented in Indian culture. from music, sports, culture.India doesn't belong to anyone one .it belongs to everyone. Yes the government might be against Sikhs. but thats the government. which has nothing to do with the average people and culture ect.

When other people are so proud of where they come from ie mexico, spain, ect. why shouldn't we say we are proud to be an Indian. it doesn't make us any less Sikh.This is our land and I love going to India and visiting our homeland. Ive traveled to many countries but nothing compares to India and my home City of Amritsar.

Being proud to call ourselves Indian doesn't mean we are agreeing with politicians. I think another reason why people don't want to associate with being Indian is because they think its not cool as they usually show the bad sides of India in the media.Even though other cultures of India might not be as good as punjabi culture ie music, food, sports ect. we should still embrace it as that is the diversity of India. Indian cuisine is the number 1 in the world. many people would love to be classified as Indians and are envious of our culture. We should not take for granted where we come from. Instead of overly westernized Sikhs who think they are British, we can be British indian and Sikh at the same time. lets not shy away from being India. because of the way the media portrays Indians as some Skinny dark skinned rickshaw driver. India is full of many different people.

Being Indian doesn't belong to Hindus. Sikhs can be proud to be Indian to. as you get older you start to realise this. instead of the youth who go over the top with being Punjabi.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I am talking about being proud of Indian culture, food, music. I am not talking about being proud of politicians and government atrocities. that is a completely separate issue and is plain obvious that no is going to be proud of that. Are you suggesting we should be more proud of being British?

We are Indian and we cant let anyone take away our national identity. Sikhs are very well represented in Indian culture. from music, sports, culture.India doesn't belong to anyone one .it belongs to everyone. Yes the government might be against Sikhs. but thats the government. which has nothing to do with the average people and culture ect.

If it's just food, music and maybe other items of culture like dress and art. Then it won't last long since all of those can be described as art forms, they evolve and change with time and place. Being a part of the diaspora we won't inherit these directly. Maybe that is a good thing- being America-Sikh, British-Sikh or Canadian-Sikh (Western Sikh) is our own identity to form when it comes to those matters. It seems we can lead the fashion in paagh with armani suit fashion if we want to some Indian-Sikhs (nationality wise- Sikhs do live in places in India other than Punjab, some in Maharashtra, South India and Delhi). I don't mind south Indian dishes when it comes to idli-dosa but for me nothing beats the good old italian pizza. The global village culture allows us the express ourselves as we please, as for music most of the bhangra industry is lead in the UK, most produces for it are all in west midlands, vocalists usually fly over to record sometimes and do fly over to punjab to record videos sometimes in studio over there or here or else where. If it's art long gone are the days of Indian art form everyone is getting into computer graphics - art forms like those being taken up by Inkquisitive. So we don't have to follow on to Indian culture we get to define our own culture.

When it comes to people saying drinking alcohol is punjabi culture, it's untrue and in fact people are forming it as our culture, which surely is a nice way to destroy our kaum.

Afghan Sikhs do also claim to have ethnic backgrounds besides Indian and some would identify their own hence as Afghan but religion is Sikh. I've heard some afghan Sikhs are Kurds (the people saddam tried to kill in Iraq) from Kurdistan.

.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I am talking about being proud of Indian culture, food, music. I am not talking about being proud of politicians and government atrocities. that is a completely separate issue and is plain obvious that no is going to be proud of that. Are you suggesting we should be more proud of being British?

Indian states have different cultures. South Indians dislike North Indians imposing Hindi in conversations. Seen freshy bust ups in internet cafes over it lol.

I enjoy Rajhastani, Veg West Bengal Cuisine, but find South Indian mirch masseleh like volcanoe, gujrati food tiny portions not enough for horse! But if you sit a Panjabi family in a gujrati restaurant how are we meant to know whats what?

Indians and Pakistanis do not market Restaurants very well when they label it "Indian". Its not separatist to say which State the food comes from. If they did both Indians and Outsiders appreciate the different cultures of India better. I now am liking Rajhastani culture, dance, twirled moucha, big turbans and castles..The distinctive traits stand out. It does not mean all of india is like that..So then what is culture?

How can we be proud of soft romanticised Hindi Music ending with fantasies 7000 miles away? Practical people listen to practical music fit for the time and place.

What makes Indian culture? if its tolerance celebration love for diversity then you will find most of us are up for it. But Hindi is not the language of a Punjabi or Bengali. It is not more civilised it just does not sound as blunt.. Hindi Media films are based in Mumbais ELite community. What do they have to do with the average joe hanaa?

when Indians kept their ancient side, anyone would love it. When theres soo much change upheavel colonisation, moving into the modern age,though the shift has been great for empowering women, yet its sad to see Indians loose their heritage. If there was a Rani Jhansi today every Diaspora person would celebrate her.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
 Share


  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • yeh it's true, we shouldn't be lazy and need to learn jhatka shikaar. It doesn't help some of grew up in surrounding areas like Slough and Southall where everyone thought it was super bad for amrit dharis to eat meat, and they were following Sant babas and jathas, and instead the Singhs should have been normalising jhatka just like the recent world war soldiers did. We are trying to rectifiy this and khalsa should learn jhatka.  But I am just writing about bhog for those that are still learning rehit. As I explained, there are all these negative influences in the panth that talk against rehit, but this shouldn't deter us from taking khanda pahul, no matter what level of rehit we are!
    • How is it going to help? The link is of a Sikh hunter. Fine, but what good does that do the lazy Sikh who ate khulla maas in a restaurant? By the way, for the OP, yes, it's against rehit to eat khulla maas.
    • Yeah, Sikhs should do bhog of food they eat. But the point of bhog is to only do bhog of food which is fit to be presented to Maharaj. It's not maryada to do bhog of khulla maas and pretend it's OK to eat. It's not. Come on, bro, you should know better than to bring this Sakhi into it. Is this Sikh in the restaurant accompanied by Guru Gobind Singh ji? Is he fighting a dharam yudh? Or is he merely filling his belly with the nearest restaurant?  Please don't make a mockery of our puratan Singhs' sacrifices by comparing them to lazy Sikhs who eat khulla maas.
    • Seriously?? The Dhadi is trying to be cute. For those who didn't get it, he said: "Some say Maharaj killed bakras (goats). Some say he cut the heads of the Panj Piyaras. The truth is that they weren't goats. It was she-goats (ਬਕਰੀਆਂ). He jhatka'd she-goats. Not he-goats." Wow. This is possibly the stupidest thing I've ever heard in relation to Sikhi.
    • Instead of a 9 inch or larger kirpan, take a smaller kirpan and put it (without gatra) inside your smaller turban and tie the turban tightly. This keeps a kirpan on your person without interfering with the massage or alarming the masseuse. I'm not talking about a trinket but rather an actual small kirpan that fits in a sheath (you'll have to search to find one). As for ahem, "problems", you could get a male masseuse. I don't know where you are, but in most places there are professional masseuses who actually know what they are doing and can really relieve your muscle pains.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use