** Tom Watson Uk Member Of Parliament Reveals Biggest Secret: Britain Involved In 1984 Army Attack On Darbar Sahib

[lsingh]

From the information released so far it is clear that not only the June 84 massacre was planned but also the Nov84 one also. The Indian, excuses that is was not planned and they had poor intelligence is false when it has been shown that not only Indian Intelligence agents were monitoring Amritsar but also foreign agencies as well and sharing information between themselves.

The Sikh Defenders not only faced the entire Indian establishment with its enormous military and intelligence resources but also the Congress, BJP/RSS, Corrupt Akalis, Nirankaris, various sects with their self styled Gurus, Santa Singh and some of the Buddha Dal and Foreign Govt resources also.

The Singhs were the bravest of the brave. The Panth salutes them.

[singh135]

The Sikh Defenders not only faced the entire Indian establishment with its enormous military and intelligence resources but also the Congress, BJP/RSS, Corrupt Akalis, Nirankaris, various sects with their self styled Gurus, Santa Singh and some of the Buddha Dal and Foreign Govt resources also.The Singhs were the bravest of the brave. The Panth salutes them.

Not only that they faced the combined might of an international enemy with the guidance of the worlds special forces

Dhan dhan Kalgidhar de shere

[WaljinderSingh]

If we get the full disclosure of the documents, because there was a collusion of intelligence, we may get the following answers as well

- How many and which Indian army personnel were used during the operation and how many Singhs fought

- What military equipments (including helicopters) were used by the army and what were used by the Singhs

- How much Sangat was inside the complex during attack and how many were allowed to leave.

- How many casualties of the Sangat and how many wounded

- What happened to the bodies of the deceased and whether they were indeed mass-cremated just outside the complex

- Any mistreatment by the Indian army on the Sangat

- How many army personnel died and wounded

- What happened to the Sikh reference library literature and if it still exists somewhere

-Why were the tanks involved if the number of casualties on the army side was very low (official figure 82)

[DiscoverSikhism]

Waheguru Ji Ka Khalsa, Waheguru Ji Ki Fateh

e-petition http://epetitions.direct.gov.uk/petitions/59219

British support for the attack on the Golden Temple at Amritsar, India

Responsible department: Foreign and Commonwealth Office

The government has recently published documents under the 30 year rule that suggest the Foreign Office authorised military planning advice to the government of India in regard to the raid on the Golden Temple at Amritsar during 1984.

We would like the government to make a statement in the House of Commons as to how and why the secret decision was taken and what military support was given to India; publish all documents relating to this matter and consider an official apology to the Sikh community.

[Mehtab Singh]

I don't know why, but I feel Gen Sinha should be among the representatives among Sikhs to investigate from our side.

[WaljinderSingh]

I don't know why, but I feel Gen Sinha should be among the representatives among Sikhs to investigate from our side.

Good point. He can relay the truth behind the scenes during army pre-army planning but not what really happened just before,during and after the operation since he was not part of the operation.

But he may have had discussions with other Army generals who took part in the operation but not sure he will be willing to share that without their consent...

[DiscoverSikhism]

Waheguru Ji Ka Khalsa, Waheguru Ji Ki Fateh

Twitter Message to - @SikhsForJustice what is the legal position behind the UK taking part in planning the 1984 genocide? that this was pre-meditated genocide?

Response - @DiscoverSikhism all accomplices in a crime are criminal irrespective of the degree of their involvement

[lsingh]

Question to the Prime Minister by Tom Watson MP

House Of Commons Tabled Parliamentary Question 2013-14 183943

To ask the Prime Minister, if the review into events in Amritsar in 1984 will examine the role played by Gary Sazena and R.N. Kao of the Research and Analysis Wing of the Indian secret service; when each man visited the UK at any time; whether any man received training in the UK; and what the nature was of intelligence provided to those individuals from the Government.

17 Jan 2014 | Written questions | Tabled | House of Commons | 183943

Tabled by: Watson, Mr Tom | Department: Prime Minister

House Of Commons Tabled Parliamentary Question 2013-14 183942

To ask the Prime Minister, when he expects the review into the events in Amritsar in 1984 to be completed; if he will publish all withheld files on the matter that were not placed in the National Archives under the 30 Year Rule; and if copies of that review will be placed in the Library.

17 Jan 2014 | Written questions | Tabled | House of Commons | 183942

Tabled by: Watson, Mr Tom | Department: Prime Minister

House Of Commons Tabled Parliamentary Question 2013-14 183941

To ask the Prime Minister, if he will place in the Library a copy of the correspondence dated 3 February 1984 from the Secretary of State for Foreign Affairs to the then Prime Minister proposing a response to the Indian government’s request for advice on their plans for the Golden Temple; and if he will make a statement.

17 Jan 2014 | Written questions | Tabled | House of Commons | 183941

Tabled by: Watson, Mr Tom | Department: Prime Minister

‪#‎TruthAbout1984‬

[lsingh]

Has your MP signed the Early Day Motion in Parliament

Early day motion 945

ATTACK ON GOLDEN TEMPLE AT AMRITSAR IN 1984

Session: 2013-14

Date tabled: 14.01.2014

Primary sponsor: McDonnell, John

Sponsors: Watson, Tom

George, Andrew

Sharma, Virendra

McDonnell, Alasdair

Llwyd, Elfyn

That this House notes with concern the evidence now available as a result of the most recent release of Foreign and Commonwealth Office documents which reveal that in 1984 the then Prime Minister, Margaret Thatcher, and Foreign Secretary, Geoffrey Howe, agreed that the UK would provide military assistance in the form of SAS advice in planning the assault by Indian forces on the Sikh's Golden Temple at Amritsar which resulted in a large number of deaths and the desecration of this holy place; further notes that the authorisation of this military assistance was kept secret; and calls on the Government to establish an independent public inquiry into the collusion between the UK and Indian governments on the perpetration of this massacre, including the immediate release of UK Government documents relating to it.

Filter EDMs by:

Total number of signatures: 22 .

Showing 22 out of 22

MP's who have signed.

Campbell, Ronnie Labour Party Blyth Valley 15.01.2014

Caton, Martin Labour Party Gower 15.01.2014

Corbyn, Jeremy Labour Party Islington North 15.01.2014

Cunningham, Jim Labour Party Coventry South 15.01.2014

Gapes, Mike Labour Party Ilford South 20.01.2014

George, Andrew Liberal Democrats St Ives 15.01.2014

Godsiff, Roger Labour Party Birmingham Hall Green 21.01.2014

Hancock, Mike Liberal Democrats Portsmouth South 15.01.2014

Hopkins, Kelvin Labour Party Luton North 20.01.2014

Lavery, Ian Labour Party Wansbeck 16.01.2014

Llwyd, Elfyn Plaid Cymru Dwyfor Meirionnydd 15.01.2014

McDonnell, Alasdair Social Democratic and Labour Party Belfast South 15.01.2014

McDonnell, John Labour Party Hayes and Harlington 14.01.2014

Meale, Alan Labour Party Mansfield 16.01.2014

Osborne, Sandra Labour Party Ayr Carrick and Cumnock 21.01.2014

Qureshi, Yasmin Labour Party Bolton South East 16.01.2014

Sanders, Adrian Liberal Democrats Torbay 16.01.2014

Sharma, Virendra Labour Party Ealing Southall 15.01.2014

Skinner, Dennis Labour Party Bolsover 15.01.2014

Ward, David Liberal Democrats Bradford East 15.01.2014

Watson, Tom Labour Party West Bromwich East 14.01.2014

Williamson, Chris Labour Party Derby North 16.01.2014

[DiscoverSikhism]

Waheguru Ji Ka Khalsa, Waheguru Ji Ki Fateh

January 21st, 2014 | Tom Watson MP

The response of the Cabinet Secretary is below.

I’ve spoken to him today. He was very clear that he thinks the “cat is out of the bag” and that his report will be presented to the PM shortly.

He told me that whilst there is a long standing tradition that the documents of the intelligence services remain private and secret, ministers will have the right to authorise all suppressed departmental papers.

Whilst it is not a civil service decision whether the government gives a statement to the House of Commons, he suggested that if there was the political will, there would be one on this issue. It is likely that the Foreign Secretary would lead on this.