Jump to content

Sant Bhindranwale Did Nothing Wrong By Defending The Golden Temple


Jonny101
 Share

Recommended Posts

Imagine if J.S.Bhindranwale had allowed the innocent pilgrims to leave before the battle commenced or better still curtailed his ego and surrendered to the army.

All the bloodshed and carnage could have been avoided.

On the contrary, the Indian army attacked without warning. Even before the actual attack by the army, they began pumping 10,000 bullets into the Harmander Sahib complex in order to provoke a response from the Sikhs. They did this in order to see the positions of the Sikh defenders. But Gen Shabeg Singh knew this and ordered the Sikh defenders to keep silent and not respond. But it is the Indian army which did not once think that it might hit some pilgrim (which it did). Even before the attack, they did not once warn the pilgrims so they could leave. They attacked without any provocation or warning. This is according to eye witness accounts of the pilgrims themselves who survived the attack.

And why should Sant Jee surrender? He was in the house of his Guru. Who is she to tell a Sikh to leave the house of his Guru? It was the ego of Indira Gandhi that was inflated. She could not handle the fact that there was someone who was standing up to her 'highness'. She wanted to teach the Sikhs a lesson they would never forget.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Imagine if J.S.Bhindranwale had allowed the innocent pilgrims to leave before the battle commenced or better still curtailed his ego and surrendered to the army.

All the bloodshed and carnage could have been avoided.

What makes you think Bhindranewale had any say on who entered or left the Harmandir Sahib complex ? He wasn't controlling who entered and who left, he wasn't forcefulky holding anyone in the complex.

This was a delibrately timed attack by the Indian government at a time when they knew the complex would be full of pilgrims so that they could inflict maximum casulties to teach Sikhs a lesson and gain popularity at the votes at the next election for Indira Gandhi by falsely labelling a minority as terrorists.

It was the Indian army that didn't allow pilgrims to leave the complex and murdered hundreds of innocent men,women and children.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Let's go back to the root cause. What if Indira and her group had been a honest and wanted the development of all citizens instead of coming up with barbaric genocidal policies against the Sikhs. Most Indians also say she was a corrupt ruler. None of the bloodshed would have happened.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Imagine if J.S.Bhindranwale had allowed the innocent pilgrims to leave before the battle commenced or better still curtailed his ego and surrendered to the army.

All the bloodshed and carnage could have been avoided.

Genuinely brother, there are two types of person who can write above. 1. You have absolutely have no knowledge on what happened there in Amritsar and relies on biased news and fabricated history fed by mahan Bharat. OR 2. You know exactly what happened there but are doing nothing but a troll :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

In reply to AJ as quote doesn't show,

You really have swallowed probably the most ridiculous query churned out by the Indian propaganda merchants.

Do you really think they wouldn't have attacked if Bhindranwale wasn't inside, when they had been planning the attack for 18 months, even constructing a replica Harmandir Sahib.

Bhindranwale was the bait, the attack wasn't to eliminate ''Terrorists'', if Sant Ji was a terrorist simply for being pro-Sikh rights, then I and millions of others are as well.

The attack was to strike a blow directly at the heart of every Sikh living in the fascist Hindutva Empire called India.

Watch Rajoana TV, Buy ''Dioalogue with millitants'' etc.

Don't swallow lies and think because the Indian GOVT/Military are saying it, that its true, they are only comprised of people, and people lie, and people will hurt people to get their way, They would gladly kill every Sikh In Punjab if it meant keeping Punjab as part of India.

Thank God we had brave Shaheeds like Sant Ji and Subeg Singh, ask yourself why General Subeg Singh who put his life on the line for India many times, why did he join the Sikh freedom movement ?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
 Share

  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • yeh it's true, we shouldn't be lazy and need to learn jhatka shikaar. It doesn't help some of grew up in surrounding areas like Slough and Southall where everyone thought it was super bad for amrit dharis to eat meat, and they were following Sant babas and jathas, and instead the Singhs should have been normalising jhatka just like the recent world war soldiers did. We are trying to rectifiy this and khalsa should learn jhatka.  But I am just writing about bhog for those that are still learning rehit. As I explained, there are all these negative influences in the panth that talk against rehit, but this shouldn't deter us from taking khanda pahul, no matter what level of rehit we are!
    • How is it going to help? The link is of a Sikh hunter. Fine, but what good does that do the lazy Sikh who ate khulla maas in a restaurant? By the way, for the OP, yes, it's against rehit to eat khulla maas.
    • Yeah, Sikhs should do bhog of food they eat. But the point of bhog is to only do bhog of food which is fit to be presented to Maharaj. It's not maryada to do bhog of khulla maas and pretend it's OK to eat. It's not. Come on, bro, you should know better than to bring this Sakhi into it. Is this Sikh in the restaurant accompanied by Guru Gobind Singh ji? Is he fighting a dharam yudh? Or is he merely filling his belly with the nearest restaurant?  Please don't make a mockery of our puratan Singhs' sacrifices by comparing them to lazy Sikhs who eat khulla maas.
    • Seriously?? The Dhadi is trying to be cute. For those who didn't get it, he said: "Some say Maharaj killed bakras (goats). Some say he cut the heads of the Panj Piyaras. The truth is that they weren't goats. It was she-goats (ਬਕਰੀਆਂ). He jhatka'd she-goats. Not he-goats." Wow. This is possibly the stupidest thing I've ever heard in relation to Sikhi.
    • Instead of a 9 inch or larger kirpan, take a smaller kirpan and put it (without gatra) inside your smaller turban and tie the turban tightly. This keeps a kirpan on your person without interfering with the massage or alarming the masseuse. I'm not talking about a trinket but rather an actual small kirpan that fits in a sheath (you'll have to search to find one). As for ahem, "problems", you could get a male masseuse. I don't know where you are, but in most places there are professional masseuses who actually know what they are doing and can really relieve your muscle pains.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use