Jump to content

Air India Flight 182


Recommended Posts

CanadaSingh your arguments are weak and don't hold up.

It won't let me paste links on here ?

Go on SearchSikhism website on how Khalistan can happen but MORE Importantly Why it needs to happen.


How would Khalistan survive economically?

Well, how did India and Pakistan survive after independence? UAE gained its independence in 1971 and it is surviving. Same way Khalistan will survive but it will not be a third world country because Sikhs are very hard working people. Punjab is a cultivated land and it provides most of the food for India. Punjab produces corn, wheat, sugarcanes, sporting goods, clothing, industrial material and many other commodities. Khalistani government will keep this stuff as much as it needs and the rest will be shipped out to other countries as a trade and in return oil and other necessities will be bought. No one in Khalistan will die out of hunger because if Punjab can provide food for 90% of the Indian population then it surely can provide food for everyone in Khalistan because the population in Khalistan will be a lot less than Indian population.
- See more at: http://www.searchsikhism.com/khalistan#sthash.UnVV2Tf0.dpuf

Link to comment
Share on other sites

should of said it better

not all babbar khalsa members were terrorists

their were a few bad apples in babbar khalsa

talwinder parmar and his crew and supporters

now many members of babbar khalsa were not terrorists but saint soldiers

but their were bad apples like talwinder parmar in the movement

and its bin said that talwinder parmar broke off from babbar khalsa and formed babbar khalsa international

terrorist is anyone who targets innocent people

America dropping atomic bombs on japan was act of terrorism

Link to comment
Share on other sites

bobbymann75 the arguments I made are not weak and do hold up

if you study 1947 and why many Sikh leaders stopped demanding a independent country and instead wanted a Sikh state you would understand its cause a Sikh country

in that region of south asia would become an economic slave to Pakistan or india

I know we can't post links on this site otherwise id just be posting links rather then talking so much

independent Sikh country means no ports cause their would be no ocean which means no trade

in order to trade an independent Sikh country would be at the mercy of Pakistan and india in order to use their ports for trade

we would need goods made in the Sikh country to be taken through Pakistan or india all the way down south to the ports in south india to load those goods onto ships and send them to other countries

at same time when it would come to trade when a Sikh country would receive goods once again it would have to negotiate with india and Pakistan in allowing them to use their ocean ports to bring in goods and services

Link to comment
Share on other sites

best solution for Sikhs in Punjab is to have a cultural revolution focused on Sikh philosophy

that way we can start voting out corrupt politicans

and vote in politicians who follow Sikh philosophy of helping the poor and standing up to evil and corruption and trying to improve people's lives

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sikhs are the most prosperous community, and some of you think we cannot have a prosperous country that make no sense. Sikh raj of maharaja Ranjit Singh is still a consider an example for other countries. Anything will be better than what we have with India now. Tell people whose families have been killed by terrorist India that Khalistan is not worth it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

no one is hindutva india's slaves accept for those who are part of the hindutva movement

secondly hindutva movement wants to kill every single member of congress and killed mahatma Gandhi so hindutva and current party in power congress only have hate for each other

lately hindutva has bin trying to take out Rahul gandhi

I didn't say it makes it impossible for a countries economy with out an ocean but does make it hard

Kosovo is having trade problems but also don't have neighbours like a Sikh country would with Pakistan on one side and india on the other

please explain if Sikhs got their own country in 1947 how would they conducted trade with other countries

they would need to use india's and pakistans ports to conduct trade

making independent Sikh country economic slave to Pakistan and india

even today with air planes some trade could be done but then they have to negotiate with Pakistan and india in terms of using their air space to trade with other countries

Link to comment
Share on other sites

acsap how would a Sikh country prosper with no ocean and having to use Pakistan and india ocean ports to conduct trade

I don't think acsap and bobbymann75 understand what type of impact trade has on a nations economy today

when you cripple a countries ability to trade you cripple their economy

irans economy is being crippled by trade sanctions were as countries are boycotting trade with iran

Pakistan and india would make a Sikh country their economic slave

cause the Sikh country would have to agree to pakistans and india's demands when importing and exporting goods and services

and of course Pakistan and india are going to make demands to exploit the Sikh country

siikhs are hard working and prosperous though many of the young generation are extremely spoiled and don't have the work ethics their parents do

hence why if Sikhs take back the state of Punjab from corrupt politicians and elect in politicians that follow the Sikh philosophy

but for people to vote in good politicians they need to culturally change themselves

right now Punjab is being driven by materialism aka what car someone drives how big their house is and how much they spend on a wedding over following Sikh principles and helping the needy and uplifting humanity

Punjab needs a cultural revolution

bobbymann75 do you believe in god

do you believe that god is very powerful

do you ever wonder if that god didn't grant Sikhs khalistan cause they were not ready for a khalistan?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
 Share


  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • yeh it's true, we shouldn't be lazy and need to learn jhatka shikaar. It doesn't help some of grew up in surrounding areas like Slough and Southall where everyone thought it was super bad for amrit dharis to eat meat, and they were following Sant babas and jathas, and instead the Singhs should have been normalising jhatka just like the recent world war soldiers did. We are trying to rectifiy this and khalsa should learn jhatka.  But I am just writing about bhog for those that are still learning rehit. As I explained, there are all these negative influences in the panth that talk against rehit, but this shouldn't deter us from taking khanda pahul, no matter what level of rehit we are!
    • How is it going to help? The link is of a Sikh hunter. Fine, but what good does that do the lazy Sikh who ate khulla maas in a restaurant? By the way, for the OP, yes, it's against rehit to eat khulla maas.
    • Yeah, Sikhs should do bhog of food they eat. But the point of bhog is to only do bhog of food which is fit to be presented to Maharaj. It's not maryada to do bhog of khulla maas and pretend it's OK to eat. It's not. Come on, bro, you should know better than to bring this Sakhi into it. Is this Sikh in the restaurant accompanied by Guru Gobind Singh ji? Is he fighting a dharam yudh? Or is he merely filling his belly with the nearest restaurant?  Please don't make a mockery of our puratan Singhs' sacrifices by comparing them to lazy Sikhs who eat khulla maas.
    • Seriously?? The Dhadi is trying to be cute. For those who didn't get it, he said: "Some say Maharaj killed bakras (goats). Some say he cut the heads of the Panj Piyaras. The truth is that they weren't goats. It was she-goats (ਬਕਰੀਆਂ). He jhatka'd she-goats. Not he-goats." Wow. This is possibly the stupidest thing I've ever heard in relation to Sikhi.
    • Instead of a 9 inch or larger kirpan, take a smaller kirpan and put it (without gatra) inside your smaller turban and tie the turban tightly. This keeps a kirpan on your person without interfering with the massage or alarming the masseuse. I'm not talking about a trinket but rather an actual small kirpan that fits in a sheath (you'll have to search to find one). As for ahem, "problems", you could get a male masseuse. I don't know where you are, but in most places there are professional masseuses who actually know what they are doing and can really relieve your muscle pains.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use