Jump to content

Sri Bhagwat Gita Bhakha Sri Gobind Singh Kirt


Recommended Posts

ਦੇਖੋ, ਕ੍ਰਿਸਨਲਾਲ.
ਕਾਸ਼ੀ ਨਿਵਾਸੀ ਪੰਡਿਤ ਹਰਿਲਾਲ ਦਾ ਭਾਈ, ਜੋ ਸ਼੍ਰੀ ਗੁਰੂ ਅਰਜਨ ਦੇਵ ਦਾ ਸਿੱਖ ਹੋਇਆ. ਦੇਖੋ, ਹਰਿਲਾਲ। ੨. ਇੱਕ ਕਵਿ, ਜਿਸ ਨੇ ਮਹਾਭਾਰਤ ਦਾ ਹਿੰਦੀ ਕਵਿਤਾ ਵਿੱਚ ਉਲਥਾ ਕੀਤਾ ਹੈ. ਇਸ ਨੇ ਸ਼੍ਰੀ ਮੁਖਵਾਕ ਪਾਤਸ਼ਾਹੀ ੧੦. ਸਿਰਲੇਖ ਹੇਠ ਭਗਵਤ ਗੀਤਾ ਦੇ ੧੮. ਅਧ੍ਯਾਯ ਲਿਖੇ ਹਨ, ਇਸ ਦਾ ਨਾਉਂ "ਗੋਬਿੰਦਗੀਤਾ" ਭੀ ਪ੍ਰਸਿੱਧ ਹੈ. ਪਰੰਤੂ ਇਸ ਦੀ ਕਵਿਤਾ ਤੋਂ ਸਾਫ ਹੈ ਕਿ ਇਹ ਰਚਨਾ ਦਸ਼ਮੇਸ਼ ਜੀ ਦੀ ਨਹੀਂ, ਕਿੰਤੂ ਕ੍ਰਿਸਨਲਾਲ ਦੀ ਹੈ.
KRISHAN LAL:
Krishan Lal was one of the court poets of Guru Gobind Singh. He translated the Mahabharata into Hindu poetry. Gobind Gita which he attributed to Guru Gobind Singh was in all probability written by him. It contains 18 chapters of the Bhagvat Gita in the poetic style of Krishan Lal and not of the Guru.

Interesting what was his agenda in attributing his own work to the Guru? Smacks of Hinduphobia.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Interesting what was his agenda in attributing his own work to the Guru? Smacks of Hinduphobia.

Seems to me that some individuals may have academic-phobia.

Those who have looked at Krishan-Lal's poetry and compared it to the Gobind Gita know the truth.

The court poets of Guru Gobind Singh Jee had immense love and praise for Him, so it's not out of the question that Krishan Lal attributed it to Guru Gobind Singh Jee ('Tu Samrath Vadaa, Meri Mat Thori Raam' style of thinking as per Gurmat, destroying ego, everything is done by SatGuru).

Vidya-Sagar Granth had not only Guru Gobind Singh Jee's Baani in there, but also LOTS of writings from His court poets...

It is widely agreed that Gobind Gita is one of the few portions of the Vidya-Sagar Granth which remain.

So there's only two options, either it's Krishan-Lal's composition, or it's Guru Gobind Singh Jee's.

Just because the evidence leads to it being Krishan-Lal's work doesn't mean that it's "Hinduphobia".

The Kavi's name is KRISHAN LAL for heaven's sakes......where is the Hindu-phobia?

Please don't make stuff up...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Seems to me that some individuals may have academic-phobia.

Those who have looked at Krishan-Lal's poetry and compared it to the Gobind Gita know the truth.

The court poets of Guru Gobind Singh Jee had immense love and praise for Him, so it's not out of the question that Krishan Lal attributed it to Guru Gobind Singh Jee ('Tu Samrath Vadaa, Meri Mat Thori Raam' style of thinking as per Gurmat, destroying ego, everything is done by SatGuru).

Vidya-Sagar Granth had not only Guru Gobind Singh Jee's Baani in there, but also LOTS of writings from His court poets...

It is widely agreed that Gobind Gita is one of the few portions of the Vidya-Sagar Granth which remain.

So there's only two options, either it's Krishan-Lal's composition, or it's Guru Gobind Singh Jee's.

Just because the evidence leads to it being Krishan-Lal's work doesn't mean that it's "Hinduphobia".

The Kavi's name is KRISHAN LAL for heaven's sakes......where is the Hindu-phobia?

Please don't make stuff up...

You just answered your own question. Other than the Sodhak committee all other institutes have agreed that this composition is Guru Gobind Singh Ji's own work.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You just answered your own question. Other than the Sodhak committee all other institutes have agreed that this composition is Guru Gobind Singh Ji's own work.

What institutes? You can try and twist my words whatever way you want to make it seem like I "answered [my] own question".

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What institutes? You can try and twist my words whatever way you want to make it seem like I "answered [my] own question".

Institutes in this case are sampradas or traditional bodies such as Nihungs, Udasis and Nirmalas. As for the Hinduphobia query, it seems quite radical to say that the Guru could never write something like this. The validity of the latter belief was first questioned by the Sodhak committee because this work hampered it's progress in defining a Sikhism in a Judeo-Christian framework.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Institutes in this case are sampradas or traditional bodies such as Nihungs, Udasis and Nirmalas. As for the Hinduphobia query, it seems quite radical to say that the Guru could never write something like this. The validity of the latter belief was first questioned by the Sodhak committee because this work hampered it's progress in defining a Sikhism in a Judeo-Christian framework.

You and some others on this website can keep on promoting the myth of "Judeo-Christian framework" by using these types of random labels including Hindu-phobia.

No one is saying that Guru Gobind Singh Jee couldn't write it. He could write whatever he wants! (Again you are twisting words).

But realistically, He didn't write this.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You and some others on this website can keep on promoting the myth of "Judeo-Christian framework" by using these types of random labels including Hindu-phobia.

No one is saying that Guru Gobind Singh Jee couldn't write it. He could write whatever he wants! (Again you are twisting words).

But realistically, He didn't write this.

And you are basing that assumption on what? One, a single, academic's summary which might or might not be evidentially authentic.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

And you are basing that assumption on what? One, a single, academic's summary which might or might not be evidentially authentic.

Does this kirt exist in puratan(period:1690-1760) Shree Dasam Granth Saroops? or only a few selected ones written after that puratan period?

Phokat Kabit is claimed as bani when it was not even found in Puratan saroops for example.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Does this kirt exist in puratan(period:1690-1760) Shree Dasam Granth Saroops? or only a few selected ones written after that puratan period?

Phokat Kabit is claimed as bani when it was not even found in Puratan saroops for example.

From what I am aware (I am sure the Sodhak committee report is available online) all purataan Dasam Granth Birs include Uggardanti, Bhagauti Astotar, this Bani, and a few others which were removed on the basis of the committee's understanding.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
 Share


  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • yeh it's true, we shouldn't be lazy and need to learn jhatka shikaar. It doesn't help some of grew up in surrounding areas like Slough and Southall where everyone thought it was super bad for amrit dharis to eat meat, and they were following Sant babas and jathas, and instead the Singhs should have been normalising jhatka just like the recent world war soldiers did. We are trying to rectifiy this and khalsa should learn jhatka.  But I am just writing about bhog for those that are still learning rehit. As I explained, there are all these negative influences in the panth that talk against rehit, but this shouldn't deter us from taking khanda pahul, no matter what level of rehit we are!
    • How is it going to help? The link is of a Sikh hunter. Fine, but what good does that do the lazy Sikh who ate khulla maas in a restaurant? By the way, for the OP, yes, it's against rehit to eat khulla maas.
    • Yeah, Sikhs should do bhog of food they eat. But the point of bhog is to only do bhog of food which is fit to be presented to Maharaj. It's not maryada to do bhog of khulla maas and pretend it's OK to eat. It's not. Come on, bro, you should know better than to bring this Sakhi into it. Is this Sikh in the restaurant accompanied by Guru Gobind Singh ji? Is he fighting a dharam yudh? Or is he merely filling his belly with the nearest restaurant?  Please don't make a mockery of our puratan Singhs' sacrifices by comparing them to lazy Sikhs who eat khulla maas.
    • Seriously?? The Dhadi is trying to be cute. For those who didn't get it, he said: "Some say Maharaj killed bakras (goats). Some say he cut the heads of the Panj Piyaras. The truth is that they weren't goats. It was she-goats (ਬਕਰੀਆਂ). He jhatka'd she-goats. Not he-goats." Wow. This is possibly the stupidest thing I've ever heard in relation to Sikhi.
    • Instead of a 9 inch or larger kirpan, take a smaller kirpan and put it (without gatra) inside your smaller turban and tie the turban tightly. This keeps a kirpan on your person without interfering with the massage or alarming the masseuse. I'm not talking about a trinket but rather an actual small kirpan that fits in a sheath (you'll have to search to find one). As for ahem, "problems", you could get a male masseuse. I don't know where you are, but in most places there are professional masseuses who actually know what they are doing and can really relieve your muscle pains.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use