Jump to content
Sign in to follow this  
shastarSingh

Sri Bhagwat Gita Bhakha Sri Gobind Singh Kirt

Recommended Posts

I have been trying to find information about this. If Nihangs believe it to be Gurbani, why havent they done any parchar or translation of this compostion ?

They have, but who listens to Nihungs nowdays anyway? All these preconceived notions of 'jhatka and sukha' being devilish has done quite a lot of harm to the Nihungs. Secondly the Singh-Sabha had this Bani removed from modern Dasam Granth Saroops, because according to them Guru Gobind Singh Ji could not have written it because it praised Krishna's dharmic actions. Today Gurbani is being twisted to insult and demean avatars. In fact avatars are an extrapolation of the divine will and assist us in understanding the perpetual battle between abibek and bibek. Ramblings of a Sikh blogspot on facebook, Sikhreality on facebook, Court Jewels of Guru Gobind Singh Ji and Tisarpanth on facebook probably has more information.

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

They have, but who listens to Nihungs nowdays anyway? All these preconceived notions of 'jhatka and sukha' being devilish has done quite a lot of harm to the Nihungs. Secondly the Singh-Sabha had this Bani removed from modern Dasam Granth Saroops, because according to them Guru Gobind Singh Ji could not have written it because it praised Krishna's dharmic actions. Today Gurbani is being twisted to insult and demean avatars. In fact avatars are an extrapolation of the divine will and assist us in understanding the perpetual battle between abibek and bibek. Ramblings of a Sikh blogspot on facebook, Sikhreality on facebook, Court Jewels of Guru Gobind Singh Ji and Tisarpanth on facebook probably has more information.

have u read Krishna avtar?

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

have u read Krishna avtar?

Your point here is? The Guru does not deify any individual he praises and criticises them as per their merits. I am sure even Krishna himself is against the Hindutva rampage in India.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Your point here is? The Guru does not deify any individual he praises and criticises them as per their merits. I am sure even Krishna himself is against the Hindutva rampage in India.

Have you read Bachittar Natak?

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

On one of those threads an individual mentions Guru Nanak Dev Ji writing an essence as well, which is retained by the Udasi samprada. Can you please clarify a bit on that?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

ਦੇਖੋ, ਕ੍ਰਿਸਨਲਾਲ.




ਕਾਸ਼ੀ ਨਿਵਾਸੀ ਪੰਡਿਤ ਹਰਿਲਾਲ ਦਾ ਭਾਈ, ਜੋ ਸ਼੍ਰੀ ਗੁਰੂ ਅਰਜਨ ਦੇਵ ਦਾ ਸਿੱਖ ਹੋਇਆ. ਦੇਖੋ, ਹਰਿਲਾਲ। ੨. ਇੱਕ ਕਵਿ, ਜਿਸ ਨੇ ਮਹਾਭਾਰਤ ਦਾ ਹਿੰਦੀ ਕਵਿਤਾ ਵਿੱਚ ਉਲਥਾ ਕੀਤਾ ਹੈ. ਇਸ ਨੇ ਸ਼੍ਰੀ ਮੁਖਵਾਕ ਪਾਤਸ਼ਾਹੀ ੧੦. ਸਿਰਲੇਖ ਹੇਠ ਭਗਵਤ ਗੀਤਾ ਦੇ ੧੮. ਅਧ੍ਯਾਯ ਲਿਖੇ ਹਨ, ਇਸ ਦਾ ਨਾਉਂ "ਗੋਬਿੰਦਗੀਤਾ" ਭੀ ਪ੍ਰਸਿੱਧ ਹੈ. ਪਰੰਤੂ ਇਸ ਦੀ ਕਵਿਤਾ ਤੋਂ ਸਾਫ ਹੈ ਕਿ ਇਹ ਰਚਨਾ ਦਸ਼ਮੇਸ਼ ਜੀ ਦੀ ਨਹੀਂ, ਕਿੰਤੂ ਕ੍ਰਿਸਨਲਾਲ ਦੀ ਹੈ.




KRISHAN LAL:


Krishan Lal was one of the court poets of Guru Gobind Singh. He translated the Mahabharata into Hindu poetry. Gobind Gita which he attributed to Guru Gobind Singh was in all probability written by him. It contains 18 chapters of the Bhagvat Gita in the poetic style of Krishan Lal and not of the Guru.

  • Like 3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
ਦੇਖੋ, ਕ੍ਰਿਸਨਲਾਲ.
ਕਾਸ਼ੀ ਨਿਵਾਸੀ ਪੰਡਿਤ ਹਰਿਲਾਲ ਦਾ ਭਾਈ, ਜੋ ਸ਼੍ਰੀ ਗੁਰੂ ਅਰਜਨ ਦੇਵ ਦਾ ਸਿੱਖ ਹੋਇਆ. ਦੇਖੋ, ਹਰਿਲਾਲ। ੨. ਇੱਕ ਕਵਿ, ਜਿਸ ਨੇ ਮਹਾਭਾਰਤ ਦਾ ਹਿੰਦੀ ਕਵਿਤਾ ਵਿੱਚ ਉਲਥਾ ਕੀਤਾ ਹੈ. ਇਸ ਨੇ ਸ਼੍ਰੀ ਮੁਖਵਾਕ ਪਾਤਸ਼ਾਹੀ ੧੦. ਸਿਰਲੇਖ ਹੇਠ ਭਗਵਤ ਗੀਤਾ ਦੇ ੧੮. ਅਧ੍ਯਾਯ ਲਿਖੇ ਹਨ, ਇਸ ਦਾ ਨਾਉਂ "ਗੋਬਿੰਦਗੀਤਾ" ਭੀ ਪ੍ਰਸਿੱਧ ਹੈ. ਪਰੰਤੂ ਇਸ ਦੀ ਕਵਿਤਾ ਤੋਂ ਸਾਫ ਹੈ ਕਿ ਇਹ ਰਚਨਾ ਦਸ਼ਮੇਸ਼ ਜੀ ਦੀ ਨਹੀਂ, ਕਿੰਤੂ ਕ੍ਰਿਸਨਲਾਲ ਦੀ ਹੈ.
KRISHAN LAL:
Krishan Lal was one of the court poets of Guru Gobind Singh. He translated the Mahabharata into Hindu poetry. Gobind Gita which he attributed to Guru Gobind Singh was in all probability written by him. It contains 18 chapters of the Bhagvat Gita in the poetic style of Krishan Lal and not of the Guru.

Interesting what was his agenda in attributing his own work to the Guru? Smacks of Hinduphobia.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Interesting what was his agenda in attributing his own work to the Guru? Smacks of Hinduphobia.

Seems to me that some individuals may have academic-phobia.

Those who have looked at Krishan-Lal's poetry and compared it to the Gobind Gita know the truth.

The court poets of Guru Gobind Singh Jee had immense love and praise for Him, so it's not out of the question that Krishan Lal attributed it to Guru Gobind Singh Jee ('Tu Samrath Vadaa, Meri Mat Thori Raam' style of thinking as per Gurmat, destroying ego, everything is done by SatGuru).

Vidya-Sagar Granth had not only Guru Gobind Singh Jee's Baani in there, but also LOTS of writings from His court poets...

It is widely agreed that Gobind Gita is one of the few portions of the Vidya-Sagar Granth which remain.

So there's only two options, either it's Krishan-Lal's composition, or it's Guru Gobind Singh Jee's.

Just because the evidence leads to it being Krishan-Lal's work doesn't mean that it's "Hinduphobia".

The Kavi's name is KRISHAN LAL for heaven's sakes......where is the Hindu-phobia?

Please don't make stuff up...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Seems to me that some individuals may have academic-phobia.

Those who have looked at Krishan-Lal's poetry and compared it to the Gobind Gita know the truth.

The court poets of Guru Gobind Singh Jee had immense love and praise for Him, so it's not out of the question that Krishan Lal attributed it to Guru Gobind Singh Jee ('Tu Samrath Vadaa, Meri Mat Thori Raam' style of thinking as per Gurmat, destroying ego, everything is done by SatGuru).

Vidya-Sagar Granth had not only Guru Gobind Singh Jee's Baani in there, but also LOTS of writings from His court poets...

It is widely agreed that Gobind Gita is one of the few portions of the Vidya-Sagar Granth which remain.

So there's only two options, either it's Krishan-Lal's composition, or it's Guru Gobind Singh Jee's.

Just because the evidence leads to it being Krishan-Lal's work doesn't mean that it's "Hinduphobia".

The Kavi's name is KRISHAN LAL for heaven's sakes......where is the Hindu-phobia?

Please don't make stuff up...

You just answered your own question. Other than the Sodhak committee all other institutes have agreed that this composition is Guru Gobind Singh Ji's own work.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

You just answered your own question. Other than the Sodhak committee all other institutes have agreed that this composition is Guru Gobind Singh Ji's own work.

What institutes? You can try and twist my words whatever way you want to make it seem like I "answered [my] own question".

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
Sign in to follow this  



  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Disgusting but not suprised. Mars shal lah!!!! (all praise be to pagan arab god LAH) the evil extremists will celebrate. It didn't come as a suprise that a deranged follower of islam wont one day attack. UK gurdwaras were attacked by muslim gangs during the hindutva attack on babri masjid in india 1992. And Sikh youths hit back in gangs too. So this attack in derby gurdwara is obvious act of terrorism we just need to look at the patterns of behavior from the other attacks on gurdwaray in recent years from the year 2000. Now it comes upon the worldwide committee's of gurdwara's to wise up to changing political patterns of islamic extremists. If attack on chattisingpora kashmirir sikhs and gurdwara wasting a wake up call then attack on gurdwara in germany essen should have been and if attack on essen gurdwara wasnt a wakeup call then attack on nankana sahib should have been and if atttack on nankana sahib wasnt a wake up call then the attack on kabul gurdwara should have been and if attack on kabul gurdwara wasnt a wakeup call then well what can we say Sikhs will be asleep forever and Sikh sangat will stop going to gurdwaray because they no longer trust gurdwaray commitee's to keep their families safe while in house of prayer. Same thing happened to christian and jewish communities in europe and see what happened to their congregations eventually they stop going church and synagogue and the faith slowly dies because of radical islamic violent attacks on them. It's a clear strategy and war on non-muslims people will try to be political correct will make excuses dont want to be accused of being islamophobic because they have loyality to muslim friends but truth is truth and you can't hide truth with falsehood.  
    • Nehru had reportedly mocked Sikhs when we went to ask for the promises he had made. Nehru had said reportedly "Sikhs have missed the boat. Times have changed."  70 yrs later,now again it seems a boat is coming , not exactly how you would like it. The larger question is are you in a position to board it or capture the opportunity even if it presents before you in near future. If anyone is observant of world political affairs today, its not hard to see US-china rivalry is the defining issue even with the coronavirus issue. In history, every event sows seed of future events. It was victory in WW2 that gave allies the power. Amongst allies, the US and USSR were primary forces and us much as they allied with each other during WW2 against the axis powers (hitler, mussolini, Japan) , after WW2, they faced each other. And we had "cold war" for 40 odd years. US due to its edge in cunningness managed to create taliban in afghanistan with help of pak (which is why US gave aid to beggar pak) to keep USSR in check . US even dismantled USSR .  US victory ! Meanwhile a poor , starving china was on the horizon of US . Its leaders were mostly submissive to elder bro US who got him in world trade organization. Being a communist country and virtually no opposition  b*tches who would go against its goals, china ascended fast from poverty to great power in just 30 yrs. Obama started feeling the eyesore. Now trump sees it fully and ever since the guy came in 2016 to office, he's been taking china upfront. Suddenly the poor friend seems like a competitor who wants to take away superpower status from america . Hence the trade war, which experts suggest has nothing to do with trade at all. It's just a thin veil to keep china from reaching america's crown.  Now china is expansionist. And it got pak as its <banned word filter activated> and increasing its aura in africa and smaller countries around india to keep india in check , infact encircle india. Russia (present day USSR) hates america. China secretly despises america. Hence Russia and China are married now !  Russia and india are old friends but their friendship today lack lustre of what it was few decades back. Indira was reportedly very close to USSR. Anyways india russia relationship is mostly seen as transactional. Now china has brought nepal against india , meanwhile india's two parliamentarians attend Taiwan PM's swearing in. This will only escalate the tensions between india and china , two neighbors who already had a 2 month long standoff in mid 2017 ! Border clashes between two are very common.  A dooming war is inevitable I think . Possible flashpoints seem to be the kashmir issue , the south china sea, the sino-india border, taiwan issue. I can already see two axis forming here crudely as :  China, Russia, Pak, Iran  US, India, Japan, South korea  
    • At the first instance it is always best to marry within your own background as long as you are both Sikhs and it should be encouraged to keep the biological diversity within sikhi strong. Castes should be shunned thats an anti sikh concept outdated and Sikhi was created to remove it those who want to keep castes are those very same people funding the drugs, castist songs and other social ill's of punjabi society. If however two Sikh people of different racial/ethnic/nation backgrounds want to get married there is nothing wrong with it.
    • This is 7 yrs old . but hopefully an eye opener  https://www.dawn.com/news/1025160/day-3-the-sikhs-of-nankana-sahab
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use