Mehtab Singh Posted March 20, 2014 Report Share Posted March 20, 2014 New York: Asking a US court to respect India's sovereignty, India's Congress party has sought dismissal of a human rights violation case relating to the 1984 anti-Sikh violence filed by a US-based Sikh rights group. After hearing arguments on Congress party's challenge to the "extraterritorial jurisdiction" of US courts, Manhattan's US Federal Judge Robert W Sweet on Wednesday reserved his ruling. The Congress argued that respecting India's sovereignty, the US Court should decline to hear the case as the party could not be held liable in a US court for "acts occurring in India nearly three decades ago, involving only residents of India, with no plausible nexus to the United States". If this case is allowed to continue, it will be a frontal attack on India's sovereignty, it said. Urging Sweet to continue with the 1984 case, Sikhs for Justice (SFJ) Attorney Michael Fitzgerald said the 1984 violence was not an accident or coincidence, but a plan to eliminate the Sikhs. The death of 3,000 Sikhs in the 1984 violence cannot be characterised as "elimination" countered the Congress party pointing out that millions of Sikhs live in India and a Sikh is the Prime Minister of India since 2004. Challenging the Congress party's contention that the 1984 case is "time barred" under US laws, Fitzgerald argued that Sikh rights' violation is a "continuing offence" because Congress party still provides impunity to perpetrators of 1984 violence. In March 2011, a US court had issued summons against the Congress party in the class action lawsuit filed by SFJ under the Alien Tort Statute and Torture Victim Protection Act. http://zeenews.india.com/news/nation/congress-party-asks-us-court-to-respect-india-s-sovereignty_919079.html 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
genie Posted March 20, 2014 Report Share Posted March 20, 2014 yeah that is why everyone in india laughs at manmohan calling the mute sikh, when ever he is asked to stand up for or do anything for Sikhs his silence is deafening. The mark of a Sikhs is not a turban or beard you can put that on hitler or aurangezeb that dont make them sikhs. The mark of a Sikh is one who has a passion for Sikhi and stands up for his fellow Sikhs. Indian congress party is a genocidal party genocial party guilty of war crimes against innocent Sikh civilians and state sanctioned terrorism. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Singh, Mahan Posted March 21, 2014 Report Share Posted March 21, 2014 I don't think the case has been dismissed (as yet,any way) . Judge Robert W Sweet reserved his ruling. He will give his ruling later. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.