Jump to content

Khalsa Raj Vs Khalistan- Good Article


N30S1NGH
 Share

Recommended Posts

Avtar95 veerji, I live in states.

It's not the matter of that they don't know us. Who in California doesn't know about Sikhs. All lawmakers are aware of who Sikhs are. As pointed above uk knew the loyalty of Sikhs and yet they offered full service to indira Gandhi. Why? It is because they see different country with whom they can have trade, financial relationship. That is the power of having a different country.

It is total naive to think that lawmakers are working for honest way or represent a lone outlier person. They may show that biut not in reality. Politics, whether local or international will only put their efforts for Sikhs ONLY if they get something in return. It is pure and simple but hard part is that our ppl are sleeping. Example: Sikhs of India are buying French car Renault duster in thousands even know that this country specifically targeted sikh turban in schools and in all public departments. Such is the pity condition of ours.

Anyway we can go back and forth on this issue and ends up with hitting wall.

So let's keep the word of sarbat khalsa of 1986 and I am sure that everybody knows the importance of sarbat khalsa. There will always be a minority who will disagree but we need not to put our energy in convincing them as that will be waste of our energy. However, we get to know the mindset of those who disagrees with something that panth agreed some 30 years ago. No offense to anyone.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

There seems to be some naïve questions/excuses against Khalistan. Either opposers don’t understand it or are against it for no valid reason.
I am sorry none of these questions are naive, and they are not excuses either. I am trying to start from basics and move on, if one does not have basic things right then we may have to go back drawing board instread of keep going.

we cannot flourish without a political State.
Highly inaccurate, fear war mongering statement.
It's already flourishing, everything is in mind, perception and outlook of life- how much one is attuned with inner and outer chardi-kalah, you are making it sound like without political state we cannot even breath or flourish - some sort of hindrance in spirituality. If anything equally can be argued- being confined to one country (khalistan-idealogy which is more valuable than sikh dharma to some) can be seen as counter productive as it blocks path way of parchar to all corners of world, fragnace of sikh dharma cannot be truly spread if its static.
Hence, sri guru nanak dev ji gave a bachan to those who engaged in evil activies- basdaie roaho and those who were gurmukhs were given - uzar jao.
Basdaie raho-evil activites does not spread, stays as stationary.

Our Gurdwaras, religious beliefs, women, children and future generations will never be safe all the time under a foreign rule. We have seen in 18th century how Sikhs were persecuted and our safety entirely depended on the mood swings of the Mughal officials. British rule was no different. Our Gurdwaras remained in their hands and we didn’t even have the right to wear a Kirpan and a black turban until beginning of 20th century. How do you think 9” kirpan became common? Because British allowed this length only. Our Anand Karaj was illegal until 1906 and in the surrounding areas of Darbar Sahib we had to endure idols, prostitutes, lecherous shops and songs until 1906.
Things were different before in england, canada, us than it was now, most democratic countries accomdate fairly well for most part.

In Hindu rule, we are no longer considered a separate nation and our survival is in jeopardy.
Agreed, i m not against idea of khalistan see my previous post. Even offered an idea to start fresh with a rename.
How can we ever justify that Akal Purakh Ki Fauj remain without its own weapons, artillery, defense system, standing army, navy, air force and training programs?
Off course, thats pretty sikh standard and standard for most countries
What does Khalsa Fauj have compared to other militaries? Absolutely nothing and that is because we have no political state. Any Sikh can practice his faith quietly in his home but the entire Panth cannot make a progress without having any independent rule.
Progress is relative term, you may define progress differently than I do.
I define progress when sikhs become khalsa when sikh start walking on the path of guru's not just conceptually but in expereince.
Sant jarnail singh khalsa bhindranwale himself said, when all sikh become khalsa - khalistan will automatically made.
Guru Sahib didn’t make us quietist. He made us active householders. We will always remain at the mercy of the rulers in our respective countries and when the law changes.
Agreed.
No one can guarantee that USA, Canada or other countries will always remain democratic, tolerant and liberal.
No one can guarentee anything. This could happen anywhere, including khalistan.
Nonetheless, these countries cannot represent Sikhs as Sikhs.
Most of them do, how you explain in liberal, ndp, conservative, canadian sikh pm canadiate (last year) where sikhs are represented fairly well.
Infact sikhs who were born in canada are attuned with wider canadian soceity serving their nation as police officers, miltary, mps etc that asking them to support khalistan won't resonate with them at all as they relate to it more being in canada than country they never relate to. They are as much sikhs than me and you.


We need a country that represents us worldwide as Sikhs so that no matter where a Sikh has problems due to his religion, there will be a political state supporting him and he can always go to his nearby Khalistan embassy.
I had a issue with passport in india, canadian embassy took care of my problems quite well, never felt like 2nd class citizen in embassy, fairly well.

Our Gurdwaras deteriorating in Muslim countries are due to our lack of political platform.
Agreed, we need solution to this problem, funding etc, team.
I can go on and on but benefits of political country are numerous. No one has to move back but I am sure many Sikhs will and I personally will never stay in any western country even if I have to survive on one meal a day in Khalistan.
Thats your personal cultural attachment opnion with khalistan, it has nothing to do with being good sikh or bad sikh.
First of all, it has not been proven that homosexuals are natural born or it is in their genes. Second, they cannot be considered Sikhs. Therefore, while their human rights will be guaranteed and they will not be discriminated in employment, they cannot have marriage rights nor can their Anand Karaj be done. They will have to live as individuals. They cannot hold any positions exclusively for Sikhs i.e. Granthi, katha vachak, Panj Pyare etc.
Not even once i try to allude homosexuals were sikhs, in any case, good to know your opnion about them.
In Muslim countries, non-Muslims have no right yet they are surviving.
Are we muslims? whats your point?

These questions are simply mundane because our focus should be on our own survival rather than opposing Khalistan due to uncertainty of other groups’ rights.
In many European countries, Sikhs have limited rights yet they are surviving. I am not saying we will be like them but focus on our survival first and then think about other groups and immigrants. If Muslims, Hindus and Christians don’t like it they can appeal in Sikh courts or go back to their own countries. Guru Rakha
I rather first focus on broader basic tenants aspect how guest/host/non sikh will be treated as that will determine overall khalistan constitution.
Does anyone have rough draft of sikh/khalistani constitution so i can read more about.?
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sant Jarnail Singh Bhindranwale has said, "the day the Indian army attacks Sri Harmandir Sahib, the foundation of Khalistan will be laid". A Sikh who has shardha in Sant Jee should not doubt his Bachans. If the Bachans of Sant Jee are not enough for you then at least consider the destruction and damage that occurred at Akal Takht. From June 1st-8th, the floors of the Pakarma was washed with the blood of Sikhs. Then ten years after that, our youth were killed, sisters raped, entire families destroyed, and thousands of kids orphaned.

ਸਿੰਘੋ ਬੇਗੈਰਤ ਹੋਣ ਦੀ ਭੀ ਕੋਈ ਹੱਦ ਹੁੰਦੀ ਹੈਕੀ ਇਨਾ ਕੁਝ ਹੋਣ ਤੋਂ ਬਾਅਦ ਭੀ ਤੁਸੀਂ ਖਾਲਿਸਤਾਨ ਬਣਨ ਤੇ ਸ਼ੰਕਾ ਕਰਦੇ ਹੋ? ਜਿਸ ਖਾਲਿਸਤਾਨ ਲਈ ਹਜ਼ਾਰਾਂ ਸ਼ਹੀਦਾਂ ਨੇ ਕੁਰਬਾਨੀਆਂ ਦੇ ਕੇ ਨੀਂ ਰਖੀ? ਖੈਰ, ਭਾਵੇਂ ਤੁਸੀਂ ਚਾਹੋ ਜਾਂ ਨਾ ਚਾਹੋ, ਸੰਤ ਜੀ ਦੇ ਬਚਨ ਤਾ ਸੱਚ ਹੋਕੇ ਹੀ ਰਹਿਣ ਗੇਖਾਲਿਸਤਾਨ ਜ਼ਿੰਦਾਬਾਦ!

Same bhramgyani sant jarnail singh khalsa bhindranwale said when all sikhs become khalsa (bhramgyani) khalistan will be made. One can reconcile both statement equally and interpret the above introvert foundation of naam-khalistan must and shall be planted

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What frustrates me is why do western Sikhs give democracy and a secular society such high regard? The political system instigated by Guru Har Gobind was not democratic and nor was it secular. Surely if there was to be a Khalistan it would be based on the same political system bestowed to us by Guru Ji.

Because it(equal rights for all) resonates with wider universal gurbani egalitarian message.

Political system by Guru Har gobind sahib also naturally based on wider universal gurbani egalitarian message.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Another question, it may be basic but quite important,

is kumb mela-symbolic gathering (gathering of all indic saints, sikh sadhus, hindu sadhus, buddhist sadhus etc) will be allowed in new khalistan? and also how much focus there would be for shared punjab cultural hertiage whether its preserving punjabi songs (clean songs), ghazals, qwalis etc?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Britain is generating too many tree hugging hippi Sikhs like you. If Guru Gobind Singh was around today your British Gov would acuse him of child abuse for sending his sons to battle. I have no pride in the British democratic system. You think you have rights to carry a Kirpan yet the moment you unsheathed it you would be behind bars. Is it any wonder why Sardars have been reduced to mere clowns?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Britain is generating too many tree hugging hippi Sikhs like you. If Guru Gobind Singh was around today your British Gov would acuse him of child abuse for sending his sons to battle. I have no pride in the British democratic system. You think you have rights to carry a Kirpan yet the moment you unsheathed it you would be behind bars. Is it any wonder why Sardars have been reduced to clowns?

Why live in UK then? If i were you, i would have basic integrity, leave britian and stop living in entitlement, stop double dipping in british generous system. Do you realize, most sikh freedom fighters begged their way in canada, uk, usa around late 1980's time? Righty so for them and families. I don't think some of humble sikhs would agree with your statement at all as they were given immense help when they needed most and they are most grateful for it, they are actually quite proud to be canadian, us uk citizens. I personally know shahid singh- son, he got his citizenship, he was estatic and now have very national sense of canadian nationalism pride in him. He would totally disagree with your appoarch- jarri thali ch roti kahdi, usi chh ched.!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Same bhramgyani sant jarnail singh khalsa bhindranwale said when all sikhs become khalsa (bhramgyani) khalistan will be made. One can reconcile both statement equally and interpret the above introvert foundation of naam-khalistan must and shall be planted

Veere, Sant jee's Bachans are not Gurbani that you are trying to find some alternative antreev meanings to it. By Khalsa he did not mean Brahmgiani specifically. By Khalsa he meant Sikhs becoming observant of Sikhi because when Sikhs all become Amritdhari then Sikhs will become such a powerful force that no one will be able to stop Khalistan/Khalsa Raaj from becoming a reality.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Veere, Sant jee's Bachans are not Gurbani that you are trying to find some alternative antreev meanings to it. By Khalsa he did not mean Brahmgiani specifically. By Khalsa he meant Sikhs becoming observant of Sikhi because when Sikhs all become Amritdhari then Sikhs will become such a powerful force that no one will be able to stop Khalistan/Khalsa Raaj from becoming a reality.

I m not trying to find alternative meaning, thats how i relate to it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Why live in UK then? If i were you, i would have basic integrity, leave britian and stop living in entitlement, stop double dipping in british generous system. Do you realize, most sikh freedom fighters begged their way in canada, uk, usa around late 1980's time? Righty so for them and families. I don't think some of humble sikhs would agree with your statement at all as they were given immense help when they needed most and they are most grateful for it, they are actually quite proud to be canadian, us uk citizens. I personally know shahid singh- son, he got his citizenship, he was estatic and now have very national sense of canadian nationalism pride in him. He would totally disagree with your appoarch- jarri thali ch roti kahdi, usi chh ched.!!

Can you suggest a better place to live? This backs the argument for a Khalistan. Where a Sikh can live like a true Sikh. Until then a Sikh will have to live how the British will accept and tolerate.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
 Share


  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • yeh it's true, we shouldn't be lazy and need to learn jhatka shikaar. It doesn't help some of grew up in surrounding areas like Slough and Southall where everyone thought it was super bad for amrit dharis to eat meat, and they were following Sant babas and jathas, and instead the Singhs should have been normalising jhatka just like the recent world war soldiers did. We are trying to rectifiy this and khalsa should learn jhatka.  But I am just writing about bhog for those that are still learning rehit. As I explained, there are all these negative influences in the panth that talk against rehit, but this shouldn't deter us from taking khanda pahul, no matter what level of rehit we are!
    • How is it going to help? The link is of a Sikh hunter. Fine, but what good does that do the lazy Sikh who ate khulla maas in a restaurant? By the way, for the OP, yes, it's against rehit to eat khulla maas.
    • Yeah, Sikhs should do bhog of food they eat. But the point of bhog is to only do bhog of food which is fit to be presented to Maharaj. It's not maryada to do bhog of khulla maas and pretend it's OK to eat. It's not. Come on, bro, you should know better than to bring this Sakhi into it. Is this Sikh in the restaurant accompanied by Guru Gobind Singh ji? Is he fighting a dharam yudh? Or is he merely filling his belly with the nearest restaurant?  Please don't make a mockery of our puratan Singhs' sacrifices by comparing them to lazy Sikhs who eat khulla maas.
    • Seriously?? The Dhadi is trying to be cute. For those who didn't get it, he said: "Some say Maharaj killed bakras (goats). Some say he cut the heads of the Panj Piyaras. The truth is that they weren't goats. It was she-goats (ਬਕਰੀਆਂ). He jhatka'd she-goats. Not he-goats." Wow. This is possibly the stupidest thing I've ever heard in relation to Sikhi.
    • Instead of a 9 inch or larger kirpan, take a smaller kirpan and put it (without gatra) inside your smaller turban and tie the turban tightly. This keeps a kirpan on your person without interfering with the massage or alarming the masseuse. I'm not talking about a trinket but rather an actual small kirpan that fits in a sheath (you'll have to search to find one). As for ahem, "problems", you could get a male masseuse. I don't know where you are, but in most places there are professional masseuses who actually know what they are doing and can really relieve your muscle pains.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use