Jump to content

Nanaksaria Ashrams


Son of Scthia
 Share

Recommended Posts

Waheguroo Jee Ka Khalsa!

Waheguroo Jee Kee Fateh!!

veer je

nanaksar is a very good place

sant baba nand singh je and sant baba ishar singh je were some amazing sikhs who were no doubt brahm gianis

and veer je

the main nanaksar in india now does carry nishan sahibs

but the reason before baba je never put one one was they dont give u rooms to live there, its only a place of bhagti

and if theres a nishan sahib at a a place u shud be able to provide accomidations for people

and i dont know wat u mean by altered saroops of guru je

they have the same as everyone else

and no veer je,t hey dont have their own guru

the first leader of nanaksar, brahm giani baba nand singh je, was a jathedar, or mukhi of naanaksar

like taksal has sant jarnail singh je and sant gurbachan singh je

at the main nanaksar they dont let u wear shoes int he langar

ive never seen tables and chairs at the local nanaksar or main

ive been to nanaksar once so far, on puranmashi

veery nice

chrdi kala singhs man, reallly

their keertans good too

normal

like everyones else

and the pic is prob. the one of baba nanak, thas the one behind guru je they put

they put one of their baba way on the sides, way away from guru je

trust me

they have utmost satkaar for guru je

u cant go into sachkhand withought keshi isnaaan

its amazing the respect they have for guru je

and the ardaas isnt different

ardaas is a benti to guru je

thas wat they do

they say the ardaas

then say some give me darshan my baba je

and it goes for like that

bhia sahib je

read up on sant baba nand singh je and sant

baba ishar singh je

they were tooooo ill

ive never seen devotion to guru je like they had

they were amazing

bhula chuka maf

Waheguroo Jee Ka Khalsa!

Waheguroo Jee Kee Fateh!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 27
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Khalistani, its one thing to add “Sant” to the name of a Sikh, but adding “brahm giani” is quite another. Let’s not use “Brahmgiani” as often as we use the word ‘Sant’. The word Brahm giani is not a title to be used in such a way. This is not an attack on those two Mahapursh, I respect them for the Bhagti they did, not to mention the Paath they also did. But lets not turn Brahm Giani into a title.

Also, they reason I have heard that they don’t use Nishan Sahibs is because they thought that the Nishan Sahib was something political associated with the Akali movement. But they forget that the Nishan Sahib is part of our heritage and parampara of our ancestors and not to be discarded just like that.

They don’t give too much importance to the Kakkars. One minute they wear it, but then they can take it off, and they don’t even consider it a sin.

Their old literature dating back to the times of the founders of Nanaksar do Nindya of a Mahapursh like Baba Gurbachan Singh Jee Bhindrawalay.

Don’t believe me then just take a look at the following link which is a story I translated last year from Nanaksari sources.

http://forums.waheguroo.com/index.ppa?act=...gurbachan+singh

“and no veer je,t hey dont have their own guru

the first leader of nanaksar, brahm giani baba nand singh je, was a jathedar, or mukhi of naanaksar

like taksal has sant jarn

ail singh je and sant gurbachan singh je”

Actually this is not accurate. The Nanaksaris consider Baba Nand Singh Jee and Baba Ishar Singh Jee as (nit) avatars or incarnates of Sri Guru Nanak Dev Jee. In other words, they claim that Guru Nanak Dev Jee manifested himself into this world by taking birth as Baba Nand Singh Jee and Baba Ishar Singh Jee. Taksalis do not consider the Taksali Sants as avatars of Sri Guru Nanak Dev Jee.

Futhermore, worshiping pictures is totally contradictory to Gurmat. Such forms of idol worship are not allowed within Sikhism

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Waheguroo Jee Ka Khalsa!

Waheguroo Jee Kee Fateh!!

singh je i dont wanna get into the sant brahmgiani argument agian

and thas wat nanaksar told me about the nishan sahib

maybe im wrong

and veer je

maybe san je wore kakaars underneath

im not sure on the kakaar thing

even u have to admit there bhagti levels were amazing

and veer je

ive seen that thread, which did make me upset

but aare u sure sant baba nand singh je approved it??

bhula chuka maf

Waheguroo Jee Ka Khalsa!

Waheguroo Jee Kee Fateh!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yup, same deal here in Edmonton, they got pictures of these living saints right above the SGGS, not one single reminder of atleast ONE out of ten Gurus. Its SICK, I dont understand how you can even respect this sect.

vwihgurU jI kw Kwlsw!

vwihgurU jI kI &iqh!!

(Actually, I'm talking about the one in Edmonton too! I'm glad we agree on something :wub: )

vwihgurU jI kw Kwlsw!

vwihgurU jI kI &iqh!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Nice Singh47, its quite simple, if the Akal Takht says its wrong, theres not much more to this argument.

If this is true, when the Akal Thakt have clearly provided a Hukamnama that it is acceptable for an Amritdhari Singh to eat meat provided it is not Halal meat, then why do we have so many discussions, arguments and fights on this one topic agian and again???

Either stick with it or deal with the fact that the present occupiers of the Akal Thakt simply are not respected fully by all Sikhs, including Damdami Taksal, AKJ, Nihangs, Nanaksar, Nishkam Sevak Jatha etc.

If they were, then why all the differences and arguments over little points of Maryada???

It seems that everyone wishes to blow their own trumpet as being the one and only true form of Sikhi as if they damn well own it or something...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
 Share


  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • yeh it's true, we shouldn't be lazy and need to learn jhatka shikaar. It doesn't help some of grew up in surrounding areas like Slough and Southall where everyone thought it was super bad for amrit dharis to eat meat, and they were following Sant babas and jathas, and instead the Singhs should have been normalising jhatka just like the recent world war soldiers did. We are trying to rectifiy this and khalsa should learn jhatka.  But I am just writing about bhog for those that are still learning rehit. As I explained, there are all these negative influences in the panth that talk against rehit, but this shouldn't deter us from taking khanda pahul, no matter what level of rehit we are!
    • How is it going to help? The link is of a Sikh hunter. Fine, but what good does that do the lazy Sikh who ate khulla maas in a restaurant? By the way, for the OP, yes, it's against rehit to eat khulla maas.
    • Yeah, Sikhs should do bhog of food they eat. But the point of bhog is to only do bhog of food which is fit to be presented to Maharaj. It's not maryada to do bhog of khulla maas and pretend it's OK to eat. It's not. Come on, bro, you should know better than to bring this Sakhi into it. Is this Sikh in the restaurant accompanied by Guru Gobind Singh ji? Is he fighting a dharam yudh? Or is he merely filling his belly with the nearest restaurant?  Please don't make a mockery of our puratan Singhs' sacrifices by comparing them to lazy Sikhs who eat khulla maas.
    • Seriously?? The Dhadi is trying to be cute. For those who didn't get it, he said: "Some say Maharaj killed bakras (goats). Some say he cut the heads of the Panj Piyaras. The truth is that they weren't goats. It was she-goats (ਬਕਰੀਆਂ). He jhatka'd she-goats. Not he-goats." Wow. This is possibly the stupidest thing I've ever heard in relation to Sikhi.
    • Instead of a 9 inch or larger kirpan, take a smaller kirpan and put it (without gatra) inside your smaller turban and tie the turban tightly. This keeps a kirpan on your person without interfering with the massage or alarming the masseuse. I'm not talking about a trinket but rather an actual small kirpan that fits in a sheath (you'll have to search to find one). As for ahem, "problems", you could get a male masseuse. I don't know where you are, but in most places there are professional masseuses who actually know what they are doing and can really relieve your muscle pains.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use