Jump to content

Why No Coverage From Amnesty International, Un Human Rights, Human Rights Watch?


Recommended Posts

I thought Sikh organisations were planning huge publicity drive to highlight what happened in amristar at sri harmandir sahib in 1984. And to try and pressure the UK govt to release more classified secret documents in regards to its involvement and collusion in an act of state terrorism against Sikhs and Indian civilians.

All I see is coverage against China and tianamin square crackdown in 1989 yet hardly any chinese are speaking out against china in countries aboard or in china. Sikhs have been consistantly asking UN and western countries for help and support. Last year saw 30,000+ Sikhs come down to demonstrate in London in june against Indian govt and seek justice for 1984. Yet slience from UK govt, UN and western countries in general.

Where is that publicity drive? Where is that coverage from major newspapers, news media channels? and NGO's?

There are so many Sikhs working in professional bodies are they all asleep that is the 30th year anniversary and no coverage in the mainstream media so far?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I thought Sikh organisations were planning huge publicity drive to highlight what happened in amristar at sri harmandir sahib in 1984. And to try and pressure the UK govt to release more classified secret documents in regards to its involvement and collusion in an act of state terrorism against Sikhs and Indian civilians.

All I see is coverage against China and tianamin square crackdown in 1989 yet hardly any chinese are speaking out against china in countries aboard or in china. Sikhs have been consistantly asking UN and western countries for help and support. Last year saw 30,000+ Sikhs come down to demonstrate in London in june against Indian govt and seek justice for 1984. Yet slience from UK govt, UN and western countries in general.

Where is that publicity drive? Where is that coverage from major newspapers, news media channels? and NGO's?

There are so many Sikhs working in professional bodies are they all asleep that is the 30th year anniversary and no coverage in the mainstream media so far?

It is indeed very disturbing to note there is no international media coverage of this genocide of Sikhs.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

We should never expect much from Amnesty International. They are an organisation with beautifull roots but one which has become seriously tainted because of the plethora of Indian Hindus that hold high positions within it. Even the current secretary General of Amnesty is an Indian hindu. Even out of the 8 that make up the Global Council, 3 are Indian hindus.

The former head, up until recently, of Amnesty UK was an Indian hindu woman.

One of the former heads of Amnesty was another Indian Hindu woman who was a niece of Nehru. She's the one that set up the Southall Black Sisters around here. She was forced to resign by Amnesty.

Indians have the midas touch in reverse. Whatever they touch turns to tutti. Amnesty is seriously contaminated and discredited right now. It doesn't speak against India because it's directors love India.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It is indeed very disturbing to note there is no international media coverage of this genocide of Sikhs.

It seems all the organisations that were ment to protect minorities and prevent genocides and stand up for victims have been infiltrated by the very corrupt evil people that it sought to bring to justice.

We should never expect much from Amnesty International. They are an organisation with beautifull roots but one which has become seriously tainted because of the plethora of Indian Hindus that hold high positions within it. Even the current secretary General of Amnesty is an Indian hindu. Even out of the 8 that make up the Global Council, 3 are Indian hindus.

The former head, up until recently, of Amnesty UK was an Indian hindu woman.

One of the former heads of Amnesty was another Indian Hindu woman who was a niece of Nehru. She's the one that set up the Southall Black Sisters around here. She was forced to resign by Amnesty.

Indians have the midas touch in reverse. Whatever they touch turns to tutti. Amnesty is seriously contaminated and discredited right now. It doesn't speak against India because it's directors love India.

In this crazy world right now people like our Sikh community in order to get justice, freedom and our rights will be forced to side with Russia, China, North Korea and Iran because the West has sold its soul to the devil and the dark side by not helping its oppressed minorities and its friends and allies (ie the sikhs )

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This comes to mind

I think I understand now... we are living in kalyug and sikhs are naturally good people the good people must struggle in this world and endure hardships while those who sell their souls to the dark-side get all they want in this life but doom themselves after this life is over.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Human rights organisations are a farce. Independent activists do make a difference, but when no political or universal body is willing to pay attention than why should H.R. organisations waste their time?


It seems all the organisations that were ment to protect minorities and prevent genocides and stand up for victims have been infiltrated by the very corrupt evil people that it sought to bring to justice.


In this crazy world right now people like our Sikh community in order to get justice, freedom and our rights will be forced to side with Russia, China, North Korea and Iran because the West has sold its soul to the devil and the dark side by not helping its oppressed minorities and its friends and allies (ie the sikhs )

This might be controversial but Kofi Annan stood aside during the genocide in Rwanda despite knowing beforehand what was going to happen. The U.N. Military commander in Rwanda, Major-General Romeo Dellaire, provided hard intelligence of planned pogroms three months before they occurred. The same attitude has been adopted for Sikhs.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
 Share

  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • yeh it's true, we shouldn't be lazy and need to learn jhatka shikaar. It doesn't help some of grew up in surrounding areas like Slough and Southall where everyone thought it was super bad for amrit dharis to eat meat, and they were following Sant babas and jathas, and instead the Singhs should have been normalising jhatka just like the recent world war soldiers did. We are trying to rectifiy this and khalsa should learn jhatka.  But I am just writing about bhog for those that are still learning rehit. As I explained, there are all these negative influences in the panth that talk against rehit, but this shouldn't deter us from taking khanda pahul, no matter what level of rehit we are!
    • How is it going to help? The link is of a Sikh hunter. Fine, but what good does that do the lazy Sikh who ate khulla maas in a restaurant? By the way, for the OP, yes, it's against rehit to eat khulla maas.
    • Yeah, Sikhs should do bhog of food they eat. But the point of bhog is to only do bhog of food which is fit to be presented to Maharaj. It's not maryada to do bhog of khulla maas and pretend it's OK to eat. It's not. Come on, bro, you should know better than to bring this Sakhi into it. Is this Sikh in the restaurant accompanied by Guru Gobind Singh ji? Is he fighting a dharam yudh? Or is he merely filling his belly with the nearest restaurant?  Please don't make a mockery of our puratan Singhs' sacrifices by comparing them to lazy Sikhs who eat khulla maas.
    • Seriously?? The Dhadi is trying to be cute. For those who didn't get it, he said: "Some say Maharaj killed bakras (goats). Some say he cut the heads of the Panj Piyaras. The truth is that they weren't goats. It was she-goats (ਬਕਰੀਆਂ). He jhatka'd she-goats. Not he-goats." Wow. This is possibly the stupidest thing I've ever heard in relation to Sikhi.
    • Instead of a 9 inch or larger kirpan, take a smaller kirpan and put it (without gatra) inside your smaller turban and tie the turban tightly. This keeps a kirpan on your person without interfering with the massage or alarming the masseuse. I'm not talking about a trinket but rather an actual small kirpan that fits in a sheath (you'll have to search to find one). As for ahem, "problems", you could get a male masseuse. I don't know where you are, but in most places there are professional masseuses who actually know what they are doing and can really relieve your muscle pains.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use