Jump to content
Sign in to follow this  
sikhiseeker

Baroness Warsi Quits Her Position Over Gaza

Recommended Posts

WJKK WJKF

I'm proud that baroness warsi has kept her morals and ethics rather than her job. I'm proud of her for what she has done and said in relation to the Israel and gaza conflict. This sister is an inspiration.

WJKK WJKF

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I dont personally like her for not doing enough to help sikhs get to the truth of british establisment involvement in 1984. However I think her quitting over gaza has exposed the UK govt in its lack of condemnation of israerli zionist jewish terrorism especially against UN targets and young innocent children. It will give weight to anyone making a case against the British govt and its antics aboard.

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

this is a brilliant article

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/ali-a-rizvi/picking-a-side-in-israel-palestine_b_5602701.html

not everything is black and white thats for sure!

shame all the muslims didnt protest when ISIS went/and are going on murder rampage, killing more than those killed in current conflict, or when taliban go round killing.

its ok when its in fighting! fact is jews hate muslims and vica versa, thats why warsi has quit, alot worse has happended and she didnt flinch!

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Warsi's role as a Minister for Faith and communities, what did this role actually involve. Every time I witnessed her speaking, mostly question time on BBC.

Should would only speak up for Muslim communities. Her knowledge of other communities was very limited, just the normal text book stuff.

Edited by Kphull
  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

She is just another muslim standing up for muslim issues.

Whereas our anti-sikh people in Punjab, india or British parliaments are standing up for their parties agenda's rather than for Sikh issues and our kaum.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

She is just another muslim standing up for muslim issues.

Whereas our anti-sikh people in Punjab, india or British parliaments are standing up for their parties agenda's rather than for Sikh issues and our kaum.

WJKK WJKF

Atleast she can stand up for other Muslims from foriegn lands, look at us "Sikhs" and how we react to other Sikhs from parts of the world. She was probably at the height of her career earning a really good salary, but chose to quit over principal. If only us "Sikhs" took a leaf out of her book, maybe we could do better on issues of ekta.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

WJKK WJKF

Atleast she can stand up for other Muslims from foriegn lands, look at us "Sikhs" and how we react to other Sikhs from parts of the world. She was probably at the height of her career earning a really good salary, but chose to quit over principal. If only us "Sikhs" took a leaf out of her book, maybe we could do better on issues of ekta.

Standing up for what? Western Muslims travelling to Syria and Iraq to fight for ISIS. Did she ever condemn these people? No, she briefly touched on the subject and blamed this on cultural misunderstandings. Warsi had the power to tackle the issue regarding extremist Islam by tackling the Imam’s and Muslim scholars who held talks on extremist ideology.

Warsi's role was “Minister for Faith and communities”, this meant she represented all communities from different faiths, not just Muslim people. By her quitting this role, it just proves she was their to represent the Muslim community and she quit because she did not get her own way.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

K Phull

The title "Minister of Faith and Communities" really means Minister for Muslims, just like the term "Community Cohesion" really means not upsetting the muslim community.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

She was a typical Muslim hypocrite and good riddance to her. She was fast tracked by the fool Cameron because he wanted the ethnic vote and thought having a useless fat lardarse like her would ensure that vote! She never won an election on her own right. She resigned because her career was going nowhere and it looks like the Tories will be out of power next year.

Here is her getting egged by some Muslims in Luton a few years ago.

Edited by proactive
  • Like 3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

would any so called apne politicians in the uk like paul uppal resign or did he resign when we learnt that the british the conservatives the party he belongs to had a direct role in the attack on Darbar sahib answer is no, warsi like him and others are all puppets, in it for themselves, who cares if they come and go .

Edited by sat
  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

would any so called apne politicians in the uk like paul uppal resign or did he resign when we learnt that the british the conservatives the party he belongs to had a direct role in the attack on Darbar sahib answer is no, warsi like him and others are all puppets, in it for themselves, who cares if they come and go .

We should put pressure on paul uppal to follow suit that would pile real pressure on cameron and make paul uppal electable again. If he has any brains and sense he will make sure cameron doesn't hide from 1984 issues. Sikhs are waiting eagerly for what the British did to our people in 1984 before and after. We need compensation and we need full support and pledge to recognise Khalistan.

Edited by superkaur
  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Baroness was a dumb lady with no capability to be the minister. She was merely used as vote bank tool to bring muslim into mainstream!

But no matter how hard you try, Muslims can't join path of moderates. In the end, the lady ended up being used to question her own party's legitimate voice questioning rise of islamist in british society under hood of "Islamophobia"!

Sikhs, brothers; stop targeting Indian govt for 1984 riots. There are few points you should keep in mind before you try to embarrass present Indian govt for 1984 riots

1. 90% of MSM( Main stream media) is owned by Congress and Sickular parties such as Communist Chinese party of India.

They are by product of JNU and other communist univeristy. For them any dharmic religion is communal and Islamism is secular!

This is the trick to divide and confuse the majority & rule them with support of rising muslims population!

2. Any thing non Muslims in Communal but ISIS, Boko haram and Islamic jihad is secular in Indian media

3. Modi govt can't target congress family since they use these media, NGO and other tools to term Modi as communal! If any of you have doubt then watch Indian english media. They are even blaming Modi govt for

Saharanpur riots despite 5000 Deobandi muslims who rioted and burnt & ransacked 100 shops

4. 60% of sikhs are tricked & still vote for congress party.

If you oppose Modi, then you support this jihadi supporters Congress who will ensure that Sikhs be cowed down. They will only support muslims.

Just see what is happening in UK, All parties are going after muslim vote banks & muslims are going after Shariah law!!

Think about your future. Hindus don't want to dilute Sikhism.! Muslims in India were 7% in 1947 and they have grown to 14% in 2014. I would wish, Sikhs organisation should convert these radical muslims to Sikhism & save our society into becoming Pakistan.

Fighting against present Indian govt will unite jihadi Indian congress . Many of us personally want Tytler and others to be punished but the congressi gangs(NGO, Media)are too powerful in India.

I agree with one of your points of Sikhs should be converting the muslims to Sikhism.

And congress party caters to the Indian muslim vote bank. However BJP and Hindu nationalists were the ones who started the fight between sikhs starting in 1950's right after india alleged independence. And it is for Hindu nationalists to give Sikhs their area of Self rule and self respect in a federal India so that Sikhs can be free to live under their own autonomous area of self regulation trade, governance,etc.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

We should promote Muslims in Bihar & UP to join Sikhism. Muslims are naive and stupid.

Lets start with you then. When are you planning on keeping the Sikh roop?
  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
Sign in to follow this  



×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use