Jump to content

Cancel White House Invitation To Pm Modi-Organizer Of 2002 Massacre Of Muslims. Ban Bjp For 1984 Attack On Golden Temple


Bhawansingh
 Share

Recommended Posts

ISI plans to use US, UN to tar Modi

1. Why are you guys blaming Modi for Sikh riots?
Coming back to 2002 riots: Indian SC have not found Modi guilt of 2002 riots. Its like blaming Manmohan singh for Sikh riots.
2. Why are you siding with ISI. Do any of you have concern about the condition of Sikhs in Pakistan.
3. Most of you are disconnected from sikhs in India. Do you even realize the ground reality in India?

Yes lets blame those useless bastards across the border who cannot alleviate their own financial burdens but always somehow have money to ruin old India.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

ISI indeed have no capability but many of Muslims MEP in EU,UK are being lobbied with Contorted petitions and article written by Congress and Communist NGO from India!

They are working for Interests of ISI.

Rarely, you will find a Hindu not supporting Sikhs in India & here is this petition from a disconnected Sikh organization of US who are blaming Modi for 1984 riots!

For 2002 riots, there were 100 hindus persecuted with life and death sentence. It has been the most sensational and hyped riots in last century.

Many of you forget the fact that 70 Hindu religious members were burnt with Petrol bomb by a mob of 2000-3000 muslim mob in Godhra!

Disconnected? Really? Last time I checked the Hindu Taliban sensationally (to borrow your term) demolished a muslim mosque setting off a whole tirade of violence. Maybe your energies will be better spent trying to prevent your brothers in faith from following a primitive and violent dogma rather than attempting to whitewash a man who has been deemed innocent by the same entities which otherwise hypocritical Indians perpetually weep about. And actually most of us do reside in India, discard the myth that your beloved Sikhs are solely authentic in India and not globally.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Have you visited North India? Not a single temple survived the mughal era. The mosque in ayodhya which was demolished by RSS, was built illegally atop Hindu temple.

Now you describe Indian dharmic religions as violent dogma. Next time, you will say Islam is religion of peace:)

I know you all are bunch of khalistani sympathizers. Khalistan => Khali Stan (Blank Space).

Continue to work as pawn of these Pakistani handlers and enjoy what these jihadi do to Sikh girls in UK.

All you and your kind can do is blame a second party for your own inherent faults. You are blind to reality. Now if Sikhs were to go to Benaras and demolish the temples which their beloved Hindu brothers have built upon the ruins of a Gurudwara (aptly destroyed in the name of Durga) you and your kind will be up in arms. Indian Dharmic religions? Once again you show your parochialism. Dharma has no identity so how can you call them Indian? On the second hand I would be more concerned about the rape epidemic affecting Indian women in North India itself. Shameful Hindus, over several centuries, employed women as so called religious prostitutes, burnt them on the pyre of their husbands, and raped them after slaughtering their menfolk are now lost as to what to do when the same treatment is meted out to their own women.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Oo Yes. we should be blind to our past and present & let those tribal war mongers conquer our land. We should forget the main reason behind Sati pratha in Medieval period .Then, the mughals kidnapped women & pushed them in harem. There is no historic indication of Sati in Vedic books, Ramayan & Mahabharata!

Where did Sanatan Dharma, Jainisn, Buddhism & Sikhism originate?

=> East london?

Now, you are comparing internal problems concerning law & order with religious bigotry of religion of peace. As a global citizen, you must be more concerned with rise of Islamic extremism in West Asia, Pakistan and India.

Actually I am more concerned with the subtle rise of Hindu terrorism in India. The Simritis are replete with Sati. Even before Islam infiltrated the sub-continent, Greek observers such as Strabo, Aristobulus of Cassendreia, Odoric of Pordenone all mention Sati as being customary in Hindu society. Why cannot you accept the truth? Why do you have to justify your own gender biased history through myths?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Do you see any Sati in modern India? I have seen Shariah law in Luton and London:)

Hindu terrorism is misnomer used by Communist, Khangress and Secular politicians to appease Muslims.

ISIS, LeT,Taliban,AlQaida, Bokoharam are Hindu terror organisation!

It seems that your definition of terror radically differs from that of the accepted one. The world was blind to Islamic radicalism and let it grow unopposed. Lets hope it awakens to the ascending prowess of Hindutva and nips it in the bud before it outdo's Islam. There is no sati in India thanks to farsighted reformers. But the lot of women is still the same. You already reveal your chauvinism through the employ of 'secular politicians.' If in your fantasy you deem Islamic organizations to share some link with Hinduism then so be it. I personally see no variation between their terror and the so called Hindutva jihad.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

And where does this fantasy of UP arise from? It s probably eligible to say that the majorities on both sides of the border perceive the Sikhs in the same light. The followers of this same violent dogma have been at their throats since 1950 A.D. even attempting to eradicate their language.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hinduism is not a missionary religion. Growth of Right wing in India is synonymous with growth of right wing in England.

Do you even know that BJP shed off Ayodhya temple issue in last general election.

With rise of hindu missile class, our right wing organization is reforming itself to suit itself in 21st century. They support economic reforms and support modern technology!

It's muslim who still are stuck with 7th century cult. Recent problems in UP have been driven by so called secular party.

1. Saharanpur riots => supported by congress and SP. 10000 muslim deobandi youth burnt 100 shops of sikhs

2. Moradabad riot => Some Muslim organization with backing of SP sickular govt, forced hindus to take out loudspeaker from a temple!

3. Meerut riot => Gang rape and force conversion of a hindu girl to Islam!

Without right wing, India would turn into Luton and East London!!

Bravo a similar excuse is employed by muslims. What an ingenius method to shove the chauvinism in your own belief under the carpet. Is that how you justify the anti-Sikh riots? 'They were necessary otherwise hinduism was in danger etc etc.'

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sikhs are grossly over represented in India: Bollywood, Industry, Technology, Government, Armed forces!

Now you compare with Pakistan or any other country in world!!

I only see Punjabi language and Punjabi culture in Bollywood?

You are definitely not an Indian Sikh.

There is a mass variation between Punjabism and Sikhism. It is after all your sort who cry foul over the Sikh synoymity with Punjab by promulgating the Punjabi brand of Hinduism. 'Grossly?' Did your own view just hit a nerve?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You will find many turbans in Bollywood movies:) Most of the Hindus prefer Sikhs to follow their faith. It's good for unity of our nation.

Infact, we want bollywood to promote Sikh culture.

There is no question of hitting a nerve. Many hindus are proud of the Sikh religion & we dont want it to be diluted!

Apologist garbage. 'Most of the Hindus prefer Sikhs to follow their faith.' Thank you for confirming the dogmatic chauvinism this petition intends to battle.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sikhs4Justice need to get off the Muslim lap and be pro-Sikh. I am a firm believer in Sikhs4Justices campaigns except when they fighting for Muslim victims of Hindu state violence. Because that is not our fight and Indian muslims who are (15% of indian population) 150 million strong themselves are not campaigning against modi and BJP. So why should we Sikhs get involved? Muslims never stand up for Sikhs during issues we have with the Indian state.

Therefore we should mind our own business and let the Hindtva's and muslims fight it out

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
 Share


  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • yeh it's true, we shouldn't be lazy and need to learn jhatka shikaar. It doesn't help some of grew up in surrounding areas like Slough and Southall where everyone thought it was super bad for amrit dharis to eat meat, and they were following Sant babas and jathas, and instead the Singhs should have been normalising jhatka just like the recent world war soldiers did. We are trying to rectifiy this and khalsa should learn jhatka.  But I am just writing about bhog for those that are still learning rehit. As I explained, there are all these negative influences in the panth that talk against rehit, but this shouldn't deter us from taking khanda pahul, no matter what level of rehit we are!
    • How is it going to help? The link is of a Sikh hunter. Fine, but what good does that do the lazy Sikh who ate khulla maas in a restaurant? By the way, for the OP, yes, it's against rehit to eat khulla maas.
    • Yeah, Sikhs should do bhog of food they eat. But the point of bhog is to only do bhog of food which is fit to be presented to Maharaj. It's not maryada to do bhog of khulla maas and pretend it's OK to eat. It's not. Come on, bro, you should know better than to bring this Sakhi into it. Is this Sikh in the restaurant accompanied by Guru Gobind Singh ji? Is he fighting a dharam yudh? Or is he merely filling his belly with the nearest restaurant?  Please don't make a mockery of our puratan Singhs' sacrifices by comparing them to lazy Sikhs who eat khulla maas.
    • Seriously?? The Dhadi is trying to be cute. For those who didn't get it, he said: "Some say Maharaj killed bakras (goats). Some say he cut the heads of the Panj Piyaras. The truth is that they weren't goats. It was she-goats (ਬਕਰੀਆਂ). He jhatka'd she-goats. Not he-goats." Wow. This is possibly the stupidest thing I've ever heard in relation to Sikhi.
    • Instead of a 9 inch or larger kirpan, take a smaller kirpan and put it (without gatra) inside your smaller turban and tie the turban tightly. This keeps a kirpan on your person without interfering with the massage or alarming the masseuse. I'm not talking about a trinket but rather an actual small kirpan that fits in a sheath (you'll have to search to find one). As for ahem, "problems", you could get a male masseuse. I don't know where you are, but in most places there are professional masseuses who actually know what they are doing and can really relieve your muscle pains.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use