Jump to content

Cancel White House Invitation To Pm Modi-Organizer Of 2002 Massacre Of Muslims. Ban Bjp For 1984 Attack On Golden Temple


Recommended Posts

[wh.gov] || Stop Obama From Hosting Modi At White House || 100,000 Signatures Needed By August 20.

In 2002, Indian PM Modi organized massacre of Muslims in Gujarat.

"Mobs of Hindus rampage, rape, loot and kill in a spasm of violence that rages for more than two months. Mothers are skewered, children set afire and fathers hacked to pieces. About 1,000 people, mostly Muslims, are killed. Some 20,000 Muslim homes and businesses and 360 places of worship are destroyed, and roughly 150,000 people are displaced". (New York Times Report of April 16, 2014)

In June 1984, BJP instigated military attack on the Golden Temple resulting in the massacre of thousands of Sikh pilgrims.

In 2008, BJP orchestrated violence against Christians in Orissa.

Instead of hosting Modi at White House, President Obama should condemn Modi and ban BJP for perpetrating violence against Muslims, Sikhs and Christians.

While Obama administration and PM office is preparing to forge a new era of Indo-US economic ties, Sikhs For Justice (SFJ) has initiated a social media campaign in support of its petition to cancel Modi's invitation to the White House. US President Obama has invited PM Modi for a meeting at the White House on September 30.



A Facebook advertisement "Sign Petition Stop Obama from hosting Modi {Netanyahu of India}. Don't fund another Israel" sponsored by SFJ has gone viral getting scores of hits every hour.



On July 21, SFJ initiated an online petition to the Obama Administration urging to cancel the invitation to PM Modi for his role in 2002 massacre of Muslims in Gujarat. “In June 1984, the BJP instigated the military attack on the Golden Temple, resulting in the massacre of thousands of Sikh pilgrims. In 2008, the BJP orchestrated violence against Christians in Orissa,” the petition alleges.



The Facebook ad by rights group targeting Muslims, Sikhs and human rights organizations in the United States urges them to "Sign Petition, Stop Obama".



“The fact that world's largest democracy has elected a Prime Minister whose party is known for committing crimes against religious minorities should be a matter of grave concern for the western world”, stated attorney Gurpatwant Singh Pannun legal advisor to SFJ, “United States which has acknowledged the role of Modi in massacre of Muslims should not host him at the White House”, added Pannun.



Terming Modi as Netanyahu of India, attorney Pannun further stated that online petition will be an eye opener for Obama Administration which is ignoring the track record of Modi and his party BJP with regard to treatment of minorities for vested US economic interests.



"Instead of hosting Modi at White House, President Obama should condemn Modi and ban BJP for perpetrating violence against Muslims, Sikhs and Christirans" says the White House Petition.



So far the online petition urging Obama administration to cancel Modi's invitation has received more than 1200 signatures. The petition requires 100,000 signatures by August 20 to qualify for a response by the White House.

Newspapers Coverage:

[www.firstpost.com]
[www.deccanchronicle.com]
[zeenews.india.com]
[indianexpress.com]
[www.ndtv.com]
[www.in.com]
[bharatpress.com]
[daily.bhaskar.com]
[news.oneindia.in]
[www.hindustantimes.com]
[www.thecitizen.in]
[www.greaterjammu.com]
[kashmirreader.com]
[www.punjabnewstime.com]
[www.nation.com.pk])
[www.abplive.in]
[www.eni.network24.co]
[www.outlookindia.com]
[www.indiatvnews.com]


Empire State Building
350 Fifth Avenue 59th Floor
New York, NY 10118
T: 201.601.2707
F: 201.601.2610

E: support@sikhsforjustice.org

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
  • Replies 37
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Posts

terex Have you (or others like you) ever thought why Sikhs do all these petitions? Have you wondered why we do all these protests all across the world demanding justice? We have marches in several c

And we want them to leave us alone. They do not just a bad but worst job at representing Sikhs, Maachis was the sole exception. Why does it sound so irritating? Now you know how others feel like whe

Modi was banned from the USA in the past due to his involvement in human rights violations. It will be interesting to see how they treat him now. There has been an upsurge in religious violence since

Modi was banned from the USA in the past due to his involvement in human rights violations. It will be interesting to see how they treat him now. There has been an upsurge in religious violence since he has come to power and Sikhs have been victims.The RSS have announced also that minorities in India are all Hindus.Modi and most senior BJP ministers are senior RSS members.

  • Like 2
Link to post
Share on other sites

Modi was banned from the USA in the past due to his involvement in human rights violations. It will be interesting to see how they treat him now. There has been an upsurge in religious violence since he has come to power and Sikhs have been victims.The RSS have announced also that minorities in India are all Hindus.Modi and most senior BJP ministers are senior RSS members.

I agree. Hoping that we can gain the required signatures and the petition succeeds and US government has to think before they pursue this event.

And

Is it better or worst to have BJP than congress, is a question?

RSS is now in more power with having BJP in centre.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I would say BJP and Congress are fairly equal in their hatred for Sikhs.The BJP have done nothing to bring the 1984 massacre culprits to justice despite promises before the elections. The BJP supported the Congress in their genocidal campaign against Sikhs.Moreover the RSS control the Sikh institutions through Badal.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Petitions aren't going to do anything, let's be serious here.

I am totally disagree!

Yes, petitions are great help and I am very serious veerji!

Your doubt would be cleared after reading same topic being discussed on here.

http://gurmatbibek.com/forum/read.php?3,31906

It is a great way to bring awareness among our people and keep the momentum going by weather doing a petition, a campaign or any such activity that brings awareness and gives us opportunity to unite at a stage.

We all need to first learn to support such an event without questioning it's success, and only then we can actually succeed.

When, Panth has already started a petition and that now everyone knows that Sikhs are signing a petition, who am i or anyone else is to question its success and even start saying that it is not going to be helpful. Lets not hope that at least!

If you ask me, what is our motive behind signing this petition?

with no delay, I would say we need to get together and bring awareness among our people, first, before we even demand US President to cancel Modi's visit.

And then,

Depending upon how fast we get done this petition signed. We will certainly get some work done to our favor and can stand together and show that we are united regardless of fear of failures, and we are going to fight for Justice by very single mean that we could.

Let's Panth decide weather any such even is going to be helpful or not, and just provide our support in any case.

my humble opinion

Dass

Bhawansingh

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just a update on how we are doing so far with our petition.

Lately, we have some dramatic increase in signatures, which is great, and with so have got some 40,000 signatures so far.

However, 60,000 signatures are still required by August, 20.

Lets get this job done in time and not forget our Shaheed singhs and sighaniaa!

Link to post
Share on other sites

I am totally disagree!

Yes, petitions are great help and I am very serious veerji!

Your doubt would be cleared after reading same topic being discussed on here.

http://gurmatbibek.com/forum/read.php?3,31906

It is a great way to bring awareness among our people and keep the momentum going by weather doing a petition, a campaign or any such activity that brings awareness and gives us opportunity to unite at a stage.

We all need to first learn to support such an event without questioning it's success, and only then we can actually succeed.

When, Panth has already started a petition and that now everyone knows that Sikhs are signing a petition, who am i or anyone else is to question its success and even start saying that it is not going to be helpful. Lets not hope that at least!

If you ask me, what is our motive behind signing this petition?

with no delay, I would say we need to get together and bring awareness among our people, first, before we even demand US President to cancel Modi's visit.

And then,

Depending upon how fast we get done this petition signed. We will certainly get some work done to our favor and can stand together and show that we are united regardless of fear of failures, and we are going to fight for Justice by very single mean that we could.

Let's Panth decide weather any such even is going to be helpful or not, and just provide our support in any case.

my humble opinion

Dass

Bhawansingh

Brother, how many signatures did we get for the 1984 yes its genocide campaign. Where did it all lead to? I already signed this petetion but just being honest. We are to small of a community for anyone to care and thats why we get it from all sides. Another thing is we are not united, once we all become united then something can happen. All you have to do is just hop on to the Sikhs for justice fb page and see how many "sikhs" oppose this petetion.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Brother, how many signatures did we get for the 1984 yes its genocide campaign. Where did it all lead to? I already signed this petetion but just being honest. We are to small of a community for anyone to care and thats why we get it from all sides. Another thing is we are not united, once we all become united then something can happen. All you have to do is just hop on to the Sikhs for justice fb page and see how many "sikhs" oppose this petetion.

First of all, thanks for signing the petition veer jio!

And, I know there may be people opposing this petition and not ready to sign. But, I'm very certain who they are.

If you hop to the FB page and see, the majority of people opposing this petition would be "so-called Sikhs" .i.e. Non-Amritdharis.

Everyone needs to shak Amrit and start doing more of extra nitname and Naam jaap.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Only 19,946 signatures required by 20th August.

Please sign the petition if not done so far.

Let us not question the success of this petition, let all of us support SFJ who are making all legal and peaceful attempts to fight for the good cause.

https://petitions.whitehouse.gov/petition/cancel-white-house-invitation-pm-modi-organizer-2002-massacre-muslims-ban-bjp-1984-attack-golden/8fdsZrWf

Link to post
Share on other sites

ISI plans to use US, UN to tar Modi

1. Why are you guys blaming Modi for Sikh riots?
Coming back to 2002 riots: Indian SC have not found Modi guilt of 2002 riots. Its like blaming Manmohan singh for Sikh riots.
2. Why are you siding with ISI. Do any of you have concern about the condition of Sikhs in Pakistan.
3. Most of you are disconnected from sikhs in India. Do you even realize the ground reality in India?

Yes lets blame those useless bastards across the border who cannot alleviate their own financial burdens but always somehow have money to ruin old India.

Link to post
Share on other sites

ISI indeed have no capability but many of Muslims MEP in EU,UK are being lobbied with Contorted petitions and article written by Congress and Communist NGO from India!

They are working for Interests of ISI.

Rarely, you will find a Hindu not supporting Sikhs in India & here is this petition from a disconnected Sikh organization of US who are blaming Modi for 1984 riots!

For 2002 riots, there were 100 hindus persecuted with life and death sentence. It has been the most sensational and hyped riots in last century.

Many of you forget the fact that 70 Hindu religious members were burnt with Petrol bomb by a mob of 2000-3000 muslim mob in Godhra!

Disconnected? Really? Last time I checked the Hindu Taliban sensationally (to borrow your term) demolished a muslim mosque setting off a whole tirade of violence. Maybe your energies will be better spent trying to prevent your brothers in faith from following a primitive and violent dogma rather than attempting to whitewash a man who has been deemed innocent by the same entities which otherwise hypocritical Indians perpetually weep about. And actually most of us do reside in India, discard the myth that your beloved Sikhs are solely authentic in India and not globally.

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Have you visited North India? Not a single temple survived the mughal era. The mosque in ayodhya which was demolished by RSS, was built illegally atop Hindu temple.

Now you describe Indian dharmic religions as violent dogma. Next time, you will say Islam is religion of peace:)

I know you all are bunch of khalistani sympathizers. Khalistan => Khali Stan (Blank Space).

Continue to work as pawn of these Pakistani handlers and enjoy what these jihadi do to Sikh girls in UK.

All you and your kind can do is blame a second party for your own inherent faults. You are blind to reality. Now if Sikhs were to go to Benaras and demolish the temples which their beloved Hindu brothers have built upon the ruins of a Gurudwara (aptly destroyed in the name of Durga) you and your kind will be up in arms. Indian Dharmic religions? Once again you show your parochialism. Dharma has no identity so how can you call them Indian? On the second hand I would be more concerned about the rape epidemic affecting Indian women in North India itself. Shameful Hindus, over several centuries, employed women as so called religious prostitutes, burnt them on the pyre of their husbands, and raped them after slaughtering their menfolk are now lost as to what to do when the same treatment is meted out to their own women.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Oo Yes. we should be blind to our past and present & let those tribal war mongers conquer our land. We should forget the main reason behind Sati pratha in Medieval period .Then, the mughals kidnapped women & pushed them in harem. There is no historic indication of Sati in Vedic books, Ramayan & Mahabharata!

Where did Sanatan Dharma, Jainisn, Buddhism & Sikhism originate?

=> East london?

Now, you are comparing internal problems concerning law & order with religious bigotry of religion of peace. As a global citizen, you must be more concerned with rise of Islamic extremism in West Asia, Pakistan and India.

Actually I am more concerned with the subtle rise of Hindu terrorism in India. The Simritis are replete with Sati. Even before Islam infiltrated the sub-continent, Greek observers such as Strabo, Aristobulus of Cassendreia, Odoric of Pordenone all mention Sati as being customary in Hindu society. Why cannot you accept the truth? Why do you have to justify your own gender biased history through myths?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Do you see any Sati in modern India? I have seen Shariah law in Luton and London:)

Hindu terrorism is misnomer used by Communist, Khangress and Secular politicians to appease Muslims.

ISIS, LeT,Taliban,AlQaida, Bokoharam are Hindu terror organisation!

It seems that your definition of terror radically differs from that of the accepted one. The world was blind to Islamic radicalism and let it grow unopposed. Lets hope it awakens to the ascending prowess of Hindutva and nips it in the bud before it outdo's Islam. There is no sati in India thanks to farsighted reformers. But the lot of women is still the same. You already reveal your chauvinism through the employ of 'secular politicians.' If in your fantasy you deem Islamic organizations to share some link with Hinduism then so be it. I personally see no variation between their terror and the so called Hindutva jihad.
Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...

  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • No problem veerji.It is night at my place and i was doing some school work.So i misunderstood 😂🙏🙏🙏 Bhul Chuk Maf 🙏
    • I would attach a pic but then it would have to be approved first so just click on the link in the OG post to know what I meant ji
    • Sorry ji I didn't mean dastaar I meant like the paghs mentioned in the link b4. Im all for singhni's wearing dastaar and dumalla but I meant when a woman is wearing a nok pagh and her hair is out. Looks so weird and looks like a topi   Sorry for the confusion ji, when I say pagh i usually refer to nok pagh and dastaar for any   Bhul Chuk Maaf Ji🙏
    • Vaheguru ji ka khalsa Vaheguru ji ki fateh Veerji, Guru Sahib gave Daastar di daat to every sikh, regardless if the sikh is a male or a female.So many great examples of Singhanis who wear daastar such as Mata Sahib Kaur Ji, Mata Sundri ji, Mata Gujri Ji,Mai Bhago ji, and countless others.When we take amrit and become Guru Wale,we can all wear Daastars, regardless of Gender. Bhul Chuk Maf 🙏 Vaheguru ji ka khalsa Vaheguru ji ki fateh
    • 1. First of all, I said "singhs who lead a decent lifestyle." A "singh" who commits domestic violence (or is abusive in any other way) does not lead a decent lifestyle. 2. I was commenting on someone else's comment where they wondered why women marry men in the entertainment industry who are known to be unfaithful. If you are so triggered by me using "singhs who lead a decent lifestyle" as a contrast to such men, then please just accept the following more general point: human being have a tendency to be attracted to power/money/fame/glamour/physical attraction and value those things over modesty/decency/piety. That's why you see a lot of people end up with partners who don't treat them well. At some point, they probably had a choice where they could have gone with someone who treated them better, but the person who would have treated them better was not attractive enough to them.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use