Jump to content

Convert To Islam Or Die | Islamic Jihadi Beasts In Iraq


superkaur
 Share

Recommended Posts

Stalin(and everyone else I listed) was an atheist. Stalin once said:

"You know, they are fooling us, there is no God... all this talk of God is sheer nonsense"

you have given a very long list of Islamic invasions wars spanning 1400 years of their long history which no doubt has caused a lot of death and suffering. But just one hundred years of atheist history beats that by leaps and bounds. The Indian saying:

"Sau Sunaar Ki, Ek Lohaar Ki' fits this perfectly.

Just one smash of the Lohaar is equal to a hundred small hits of a Sunaar. (Lohaar=Atheists and Sunaar=Muslims). 100 years of atheist history is many times more bloody than 1400 years of brutal Islamic history. No one can match the brutality of the atheists, not even the Muslims.

Just one smash of the Lohaar is equal to a hundred small hits of a Sunaar. (Lohaar=Atheists and Sunaar=Muslims). 100 years of atheist history is many times more bloody than 1400 years of brutal Islamic history. No one can match the brutality of the atheists, not even the Muslims.

Where did you get this from? This is based on your opinion not fact.

So Islam is not a religion?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Where did you get this from? This is based on your opinion not fact.

So Islam is not a religion?

Islam is more than just a religion. It is also a political system which is why it's so dangerous. Like communism, it's also an ideology, a financial system but based on the 7th century where as communism was more modern. Communism to some extent was it's match and Atheistic leaders of communism even surpassed Islamic rulers in brutality in causing human suffering.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

it is misleading to state that athiests have killed vast numbers of people or killed more people than people that believe in god.

1. there is a far greater ability to kill people in modern times than it was in the past, the point being that had religious wars had atomic weapons and missiles then many more people would have died.

2. there are more people these days, population growth has exploded. greater numbers of people in a fixed place is likely to lead to increased wars/fighting

3. not all religious kings/generals/leaders killed people because of their religion. some people just want to rule and have power and they will doing anything to achieve that

4. athiest leaders who have killed large numbers of people did not necessarily do so because they hate religious people and want to wipe them out, as with point 3 above, some people want to rule others and they dont care how they get to the top and they dont care who they kill.

5. following your logic would lead to statements like this:

the men that killed the most number of people over the last 5000 years usually had moustaches therefore we need to condemn moustache sporting men

the men that killed the most number of people over the last 5000 years usually had brown hair therefore we need to condemn brown haired men

the men that killed the most number of people over the last 5000 years usually were men therefore we need to condemn all men

we should all be careful before stereotyping whole groups of others, many people on here would be the first to complain when being grouped together with others eg. asians, indians, pakistanis, hindus, muslims

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
 Share


  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • yeh it's true, we shouldn't be lazy and need to learn jhatka shikaar. It doesn't help some of grew up in surrounding areas like Slough and Southall where everyone thought it was super bad for amrit dharis to eat meat, and they were following Sant babas and jathas, and instead the Singhs should have been normalising jhatka just like the recent world war soldiers did. We are trying to rectifiy this and khalsa should learn jhatka.  But I am just writing about bhog for those that are still learning rehit. As I explained, there are all these negative influences in the panth that talk against rehit, but this shouldn't deter us from taking khanda pahul, no matter what level of rehit we are!
    • How is it going to help? The link is of a Sikh hunter. Fine, but what good does that do the lazy Sikh who ate khulla maas in a restaurant? By the way, for the OP, yes, it's against rehit to eat khulla maas.
    • Yeah, Sikhs should do bhog of food they eat. But the point of bhog is to only do bhog of food which is fit to be presented to Maharaj. It's not maryada to do bhog of khulla maas and pretend it's OK to eat. It's not. Come on, bro, you should know better than to bring this Sakhi into it. Is this Sikh in the restaurant accompanied by Guru Gobind Singh ji? Is he fighting a dharam yudh? Or is he merely filling his belly with the nearest restaurant?  Please don't make a mockery of our puratan Singhs' sacrifices by comparing them to lazy Sikhs who eat khulla maas.
    • Seriously?? The Dhadi is trying to be cute. For those who didn't get it, he said: "Some say Maharaj killed bakras (goats). Some say he cut the heads of the Panj Piyaras. The truth is that they weren't goats. It was she-goats (ਬਕਰੀਆਂ). He jhatka'd she-goats. Not he-goats." Wow. This is possibly the stupidest thing I've ever heard in relation to Sikhi.
    • Instead of a 9 inch or larger kirpan, take a smaller kirpan and put it (without gatra) inside your smaller turban and tie the turban tightly. This keeps a kirpan on your person without interfering with the massage or alarming the masseuse. I'm not talking about a trinket but rather an actual small kirpan that fits in a sheath (you'll have to search to find one). As for ahem, "problems", you could get a male masseuse. I don't know where you are, but in most places there are professional masseuses who actually know what they are doing and can really relieve your muscle pains.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use