Jump to content

YOYO29
 Share

Recommended Posts

OK. So lets all take your advice and become 2 dimensional robots without personality :

The OP asks is such and such 'true' and the answer to that one question he puts is 'YES'.

End of discussion. The question has been anwsered. Close the thread down. In fact, lets go through every single thread that has ever appeared on this 'discussion' forum and delete every single post that came after the very first reply. Of course, we will also have to contact the Oxford and Websters dictionary specialists and ask them to officialy redefine the meaning of the word 'discussion' so it can fit into the wonderful JSinghnz' first class take on the matter.

Took you a lot of time and energy to make up a reply.

Put these to better use for your betterment instead of coming

up with more illogical stuff to cover your stuff ups.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The question put in the thread - was gen zorawar singh sikh or hindoo, second question - was ladakh , gilgit and baltistan and part of china were conquered by Sikhs? Which of these questions are being answered by Jagsawsingh ? I cannot undestand

No. You're living in an upside down world jasvendrasingh ji. The FIRST question was about Ladakh and Gilgit and the second question (which was only valid as a follow on from the first question) was about the Generals.

Now. Here's the thing. Now that we've established you can't distinguish between first and last who's to say that Adam Sinclair from Cobham, Surrey, didn't win the 100 metres Gold at the Moscow Olympics ?

In this new mad alliance between JSinghnz and jasvendrasingh is discussion now 'non-discussion' and first now 'last' ? I only ask because I honestly feel that the world literary authorities should be made aware of this amazing new linguistic disoovery.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

No. You're living in an upside down world jasvendrasingh ji. The FIRST question was about Ladakh and Gilgit and the second question (which was only valid as a follow on from the first question) was about the Generals.

Now. Here's the thing. Now that we've established you can't distinguish between first and last who's to say that Adam Sinclair from Cobham, Surrey, didn't win the 100 metres Gold at the Moscow Olympics ?

In this new mad alliance between JSinghnz and jasvendrasingh is discussion now 'non-discussion' and first now 'last' ? I only ask because I honestly feel that the world literary authorities should be made aware of this amazing new linguistic disoovery.

Does any one know what this guy wants to prove ? that he enjoys pulling others ? that he will not allow any one to focus on discussion ? that he will set the agenda of some other ppl's question? lets decide it first before carrying discussion further ? i feel he is trying to hide his ignorance

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Zoravar Singh was a dogra general, workung for Raja of Jammu, who in turn was a principality under Lahore Darbar( M Ranjit singh). They couldnot start any expedition without permission and support of Lahore Darbar .Thus it was an expedition & territorial expansion of Sarkar Khalsa directly or indirectly

Thank you sir for clearing my doubts about the religion of Gen Zorawar Singh.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
 Share

  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt


×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use