Jump to content

Gurudwara Opens In Johannesburg


Recommended Posts

Do not know much about South African Sikhs. We are all aware of East African Sikhs but not much about South Africa. Strange since there is a large subcontintental presence there, particularly Durban.

Well not so strange from the point of view that South Africa's massive 'Indian' community, like that of the Carribean islands, were imported there as semi-slaves i.e bonded indentured labourers. No matter where the Sikh went, he always went as a free and proud man, so Sikhs are usually never found in those semi-slave places. I say 'usually' because the exception here is Fiji. Among the massive Indian semi-slave community there are Sikhs but those Sikhs came much later a free soldiers of the British Army. So, in that respect, I do agree with you that it does seem a little strange that Sikh soldiers were stationed all over the world but not to South Africa. I Suppose the Boer War and its relevance to the Anglo-Sikh wars had something to do with that but strangely Rudyard Kipling, in his famous story about the Boer War 'A Sahib's War', chooses to tell it from the eyes of a Sikh from Punjab 'Umar Singh'.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well not so strange from the point of view that South Africa's massive 'Indian' community, like that of the Carribean islands, were imported there as semi-slaves i.e bonded indentured labourers. No matter where the Sikh went, he always went as a free and proud man, so Sikhs are usually never found in those semi-slave places. I say 'usually' because the exception here is Fiji. Among the massive Indian semi-slave community there are Sikhs but those Sikhs came much later a free soldiers of the British Army. So, in that respect, I do agree with you that it does seem a little strange that Sikh soldiers were stationed all over the world but not to South Africa. I Suppose the Boer War and its relevance to the Anglo-Sikh wars had something to do with that but strangely Rudyard Kipling, in his famous story about the Boer War 'A Sahib's War', chooses to tell it from the eyes of a Sikh from Punjab 'Umar Singh'.

Why don't you read history before commenting here. Sikhs fought under the British as slaves and not free men.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well not so strange from the point of view that South Africa's massive 'Indian' community, like that of the Carribean islands, were imported there as semi-slaves i.e bonded indentured labourers. No matter where the Sikh went, he always went as a free and proud man, so Sikhs are usually never found in those semi-slave places. I say 'usually' because the exception here is Fiji. Among the massive Indian semi-slave community there are Sikhs but those Sikhs came much later a free soldiers of the British Army. So, in that respect, I do agree with you that it does seem a little strange that Sikh soldiers were stationed all over the world but not to South Africa. I Suppose the Boer War and its relevance to the Anglo-Sikh wars had something to do with that but strangely Rudyard Kipling, in his famous story about the Boer War 'A Sahib's War', chooses to tell it from the eyes of a Sikh from Punjab 'Umar Singh'.

The Boers were brave soldiers with excellent fighting skills. Even the entire might of the British empire could not defeat them. It's only when the British imprisoned all the Boer women and children in concentration camps and many of them began to starve to death that the Boer men surrendered.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Why don't you read history before commenting here. Sikhs fought under the British as slaves and not free men.

Honestly, I think there's something seriusly wrong with you jsingnz.

You're sitting in New Zealand today not because of what some great clerking some bengali in calcutta did in some office. You're sitting there today because those brave Sikh soldiers laid the foundations for all of us to enjoy the life we have today in English speaking countries. If they had known then that a future generation would spawn an ungratfeul so and so like you I'm sure they would have thought twice.

Like my own family, who proudly served in the British Army, and with it built our Sikh name across the globe, none of them were chained, hooded and tricked into the army like slaves. Each and every one of them made their own free choice to do so. Shame on you....YOU who have done nothing for any generation....Shame on you for enjoying the life they gave to you and yet calling them slaves.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Honestly, I think there's something seriusly wrong with you jsingnz.

You're sitting in New Zealand today not because of what some great clerking some bengali in calcutta did in some office. You're sitting there today because those brave Sikh soldiers laid the foundations for all of us to enjoy the life we have today in English speaking countries. If they had known then that a future generation would spawn an ungratfeul so and so like you I'm sure they would have thought twice.

Like my own family, who proudly served in the British Army, and with it built our Sikh name across the globe, none of them were chained, hooded and tricked into the army like slaves. Each and every one of them made their own free choice to do so. Shame on you....YOU who have done nothing for any generation....Shame on you for enjoying the life they gave to you and yet calling them slaves.

Shocking behavior by your ancestors to be proud slaves under the enemy which took our empire by deceit.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You mean they served as proud slaves under the British. No wonder you cannot get rid of your slave mentality.

veer ji

maybe you are unaware that they fought to keep their skills up, they fought to stand upright instead of grovelling under the jackboot, later they fought to control the destiny of their homeland and to rid the world of a hateful tyrant... whatever they did , they honoured their homes, families and Guru they did not hesitate to fight on their terms and die on their terms

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
 Share


  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • yeh it's true, we shouldn't be lazy and need to learn jhatka shikaar. It doesn't help some of grew up in surrounding areas like Slough and Southall where everyone thought it was super bad for amrit dharis to eat meat, and they were following Sant babas and jathas, and instead the Singhs should have been normalising jhatka just like the recent world war soldiers did. We are trying to rectifiy this and khalsa should learn jhatka.  But I am just writing about bhog for those that are still learning rehit. As I explained, there are all these negative influences in the panth that talk against rehit, but this shouldn't deter us from taking khanda pahul, no matter what level of rehit we are!
    • How is it going to help? The link is of a Sikh hunter. Fine, but what good does that do the lazy Sikh who ate khulla maas in a restaurant? By the way, for the OP, yes, it's against rehit to eat khulla maas.
    • Yeah, Sikhs should do bhog of food they eat. But the point of bhog is to only do bhog of food which is fit to be presented to Maharaj. It's not maryada to do bhog of khulla maas and pretend it's OK to eat. It's not. Come on, bro, you should know better than to bring this Sakhi into it. Is this Sikh in the restaurant accompanied by Guru Gobind Singh ji? Is he fighting a dharam yudh? Or is he merely filling his belly with the nearest restaurant?  Please don't make a mockery of our puratan Singhs' sacrifices by comparing them to lazy Sikhs who eat khulla maas.
    • Seriously?? The Dhadi is trying to be cute. For those who didn't get it, he said: "Some say Maharaj killed bakras (goats). Some say he cut the heads of the Panj Piyaras. The truth is that they weren't goats. It was she-goats (ਬਕਰੀਆਂ). He jhatka'd she-goats. Not he-goats." Wow. This is possibly the stupidest thing I've ever heard in relation to Sikhi.
    • Instead of a 9 inch or larger kirpan, take a smaller kirpan and put it (without gatra) inside your smaller turban and tie the turban tightly. This keeps a kirpan on your person without interfering with the massage or alarming the masseuse. I'm not talking about a trinket but rather an actual small kirpan that fits in a sheath (you'll have to search to find one). As for ahem, "problems", you could get a male masseuse. I don't know where you are, but in most places there are professional masseuses who actually know what they are doing and can really relieve your muscle pains.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use