Jump to content

Will The Marriage Be Accepted? Surname Issue.


Recommended Posts

Singh sahib ji(savinderpalsingh)I simply asked you to comment on the relevent line of rehat maryada I quoted but why are you escaping ? You may quote yuor reference later , but I know there nothing of that kind even in the book you are quoting. Please ,please ensure that you have read befire quoting something . Our ignorance may causr confusion to many Fateh

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Let me quote for your reference - " Guru ka sikh saak dikh naal kare, den lain da lalach na karey, haan dekhey, hadd sucha waikhey, matha milda waikh laye.Further , "Guru ka sikh gareeb sikh naal nata karey , guru gandh paonda hai" this is reference from rehatnama bhai chaupa singh which brother savinderpal singh is quoting.

My request to all please read books in original and not any translation .

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think that we are getting personal.please all bear in mind we are all brothers and should engage in healthy discussion to clear doubts( hoi ikatar molahu mere bhai , dubidha door karahu chit lai).FYI, bhai chaupa singh was not among 5 piyare, he was a khidawa ( play time companion of guru saheb) and yes he was a brahmin, and some of his opinions are tilred views . Still all his views cannot be ignored, he being contemoorary of guru sahib ji.I would request please buy and study book - rehat namey by Pyara Singh Padam , which has almost all pracheen rehatnamey in originals.

So much been said in this thread, the bibi starting the thread must have been confused by now. To end my participation here , I'd advise to beebi the question of the got has norhing to do with rehat maryada , and yes close bloid relation marriage is cinsidered taboo due to inbreeding malafies. Unless ther are no close relationship Established in recent past

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You would need to check with the elders and per family situation.

There's always going to be some eyebrows raised but there is no genetic issue as such. It's your mother's nankey ie. your mothers-mother side(2 generations and 3 counting yourself).

I have known some marriages like this to take place without too much problem.

Also, you've only mentioned that the surnames are the same but were the villages of origin also the same ?

No we are not from the same village. He isn't from the village my grandma is originally from either. So hes from a totally different village in India.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Let me quote for your reference - " Guru ka sikh saak dikh naal kare, den lain da lalach na karey, haan dekhey, hadd sucha waikhey, matha milda waikh laye.Further , "Guru ka sikh gareeb sikh naal nata karey , guru gandh paonda hai" this is reference from rehatnama bhai chaupa singh which brother savinderpal singh is quoting.

My request to all please read books in original and not any translation .

o balle uncle ji, kya kehne aa nahi samajhna ke u you be wrong but proove puratan singhs wrong

o bhaleyo lokon, its not gandh

its ganth

means guru jod da hai !!!!!

shabas e tuhade

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Savinderpalsingh , I have been following your all posts , in this thread you have been stressing to say that your point is only correct one , if this is the purpose , what is the use of discussion then ? it seems that you have not studied the Sikh Thought properly . The Gotra consideration in Matrimonial relations has tyo do with casteism only , which has no place in Our Faith .please have a reading of Different rehatnameys ( in Punjabi Originals not the Translations by Brits ) and you will know about hollowness of Your Arguements

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Savinderpalsingh , I have been following your all posts , in this thread you have been stressing to say that your point is only correct one , if this is the purpose , what is the use of discussion then ? it seems that you have not studied the Sikh Thought properly . The Gotra consideration in Matrimonial relations has tyo do with casteism only , which has no place in Our Faith .please have a reading of Different rehatnameys ( in Punjabi Originals not the Translations by Brits ) and you will know about hollowness of Your Arguements

i think i have stated my points well enough, cast-ism is not to promote high or low of an individual but to state the area of their origins and bloodline roots. which does turn into genetic defects later down the line,

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
 Share


  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • yeh it's true, we shouldn't be lazy and need to learn jhatka shikaar. It doesn't help some of grew up in surrounding areas like Slough and Southall where everyone thought it was super bad for amrit dharis to eat meat, and they were following Sant babas and jathas, and instead the Singhs should have been normalising jhatka just like the recent world war soldiers did. We are trying to rectifiy this and khalsa should learn jhatka.  But I am just writing about bhog for those that are still learning rehit. As I explained, there are all these negative influences in the panth that talk against rehit, but this shouldn't deter us from taking khanda pahul, no matter what level of rehit we are!
    • How is it going to help? The link is of a Sikh hunter. Fine, but what good does that do the lazy Sikh who ate khulla maas in a restaurant? By the way, for the OP, yes, it's against rehit to eat khulla maas.
    • Yeah, Sikhs should do bhog of food they eat. But the point of bhog is to only do bhog of food which is fit to be presented to Maharaj. It's not maryada to do bhog of khulla maas and pretend it's OK to eat. It's not. Come on, bro, you should know better than to bring this Sakhi into it. Is this Sikh in the restaurant accompanied by Guru Gobind Singh ji? Is he fighting a dharam yudh? Or is he merely filling his belly with the nearest restaurant?  Please don't make a mockery of our puratan Singhs' sacrifices by comparing them to lazy Sikhs who eat khulla maas.
    • Seriously?? The Dhadi is trying to be cute. For those who didn't get it, he said: "Some say Maharaj killed bakras (goats). Some say he cut the heads of the Panj Piyaras. The truth is that they weren't goats. It was she-goats (ਬਕਰੀਆਂ). He jhatka'd she-goats. Not he-goats." Wow. This is possibly the stupidest thing I've ever heard in relation to Sikhi.
    • Instead of a 9 inch or larger kirpan, take a smaller kirpan and put it (without gatra) inside your smaller turban and tie the turban tightly. This keeps a kirpan on your person without interfering with the massage or alarming the masseuse. I'm not talking about a trinket but rather an actual small kirpan that fits in a sheath (you'll have to search to find one). As for ahem, "problems", you could get a male masseuse. I don't know where you are, but in most places there are professional masseuses who actually know what they are doing and can really relieve your muscle pains.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use