Jump to content

Slaves In The Islamic State


Jonny101
 Share

Recommended Posts

It has never been the case that a whole population of a particular ideology has to be involved in violence for that ideology to be considered dangerous and violent. Islam is akin to both Nazism and Communism and has even been likened to the Mafia. It is well nigh physically impossible for 1.2 billion Muslims to suddenly arm themselves and start attacking non-Muslims around them and thus prove that Islam is the evil religion that it. For one there are no enough weapons in the world to arm every Muslim. For another not everyone single Muslim has a hard heart which one requires to follow Islam to its logical conclusion and attack non-Muslims. Millions of Muslims pay lip service to their faith and pick and choose which part they want to follow. For these Muslims they accept the very few positives aspects of Islam and ignore the negative aspects of Islam. However, they know enough to not criticise those Muslims who follow Islam in all its aspects such as Al Qaeda and ISIS. Not all the Nazis were murderers, only a small percentage were responsible for the atrocities in the concentration camps but the rest were supportive of these atrocities. Not all communists physically took part in the atrocities of Stalin against his people or Mao's cultural revolution. Yet in both countries millions were killed in the name of communism. No one ever claims that because not all Nazis took part in the crimes of Hitler, it means that Nazism has been hijacked by extremists and Nazism is an ideology of peace!

What I find surprising is that my fellow Sikhs who appear to have swallowed the ultra PC line that Islam is a religion of peace and that it has been hijacked by extremists. Don't we see the pictures of the martyrs of the 18th century in our Gurdwaras and how horribly they were killed and all of which is completely in line with the teachings of Islam. Seeking to live a life of self respect in a Muslim state is seen as an act of defiance against Islam and as such is dealt with by violence. Aurangzeb, Mir Mannu and Abdali were not extremists who had hijacked Islam, they were the Al Qaeda and ISIS of their day. Behind them were millions of Punjabi Muslims who while they did not actively join with these tyrants, yet they still sympathised with their actions. The fact that ordinary Muslims also suffered due to the invasions of Abdali does not prove that Abdali who not acting in accord with Islam. Islam like any other totalitarian ideology in the end is more destructive to those who follow it than to those who do not. Look at the violence in every Muslim country, Muslims are killing Muslims at a much higher rate than they are killing non-Muslims but that does not mean that Islam is not a threat to non-Muslims.

Here is something interesting. The Khalsa goes against every rule that Islam has imposed on non-Muslims within an Islamic state. The Khalsa refused to pay Jizya to the Mughal state and later to Abdali. This act is always seen as a gross defiance of Islamic authority and something which is seen as unacceptable. The Jizya is paid as confirmation of subjugation of non-Muslims and when it is paid there is usually a symbolic act such as a slap given to the non-Muslim so that he feels himself subdued. Therefore if we accept that Islam is a legitimate religion then we also have to accept that non-Muslim deserve to pay Jizya and also be made to feel that they are subjugated. Non-Muslims are not allowed to build any NEW places of worship but they can renovate any old places of worship. This would have meant that Sikhs would not have been allowed to build any new Gurdwaras in Punjab. Thus why the Khalsa would always been in conflict with the Islamic state. Non-Muslims are also not allowed to place any religious symbols outside their homes or places of worship. Now consider what the Nishan Sahib is! Non-Muslims should not congregate on the streets and should go to their places of worship quietly. Nagar Kirtan anyone? Muslims are forbidden to address non-Muslims with any title which may convey honour on the non-Muslims. What is the title that we Sikhs go by? Sardarji! Majority of Muslims in India address Sikhs as Sardarji and when referring to a group of Sikhs will not say Sikhs but Sardars. Non-Muslims also should not be trained in any types of warfare or carry arms on their person. We have Gatka and Kirpan.

In an Islamic state Sikhism cannot be practised the way that it has been since the days of the Gurus, Therefore we of all the non-Muslims should be the ones who are against the setting up an Islamic state in any part of the world.

.

True!

And stating facts about a religion or stating facts about Nazism or certain cults and brutal ideolgies that support terrorism + rape does not mean that we are hating on ordinary Muslims or normal Germans or innocent cult followers

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Islam's very dirty linen has become everyone's problem now.

Isis releases 'abhorrent' sex slaves pamphlet with 27 tips for militants on taking, punishing and raping female captives
girl-ap-v3.jpg
girl-ap-v3.jpg

The 'Q and A' describes women captured by the group as 'merely property'

The Isis militant group has released what appears to be an “abhorrent” pamphlet providing its followers with guidelines on how to capture, keep and sexually abuse female slaves.

Published before the CIA report into the “enhanced interrogation” of suspected militant detainees, it specifically rules out the use of torture.

But what it does provide is a sickeningly matter-of-fact set of “questions and answers” when it comes to capturing and subjugating those of other beliefs.

Though it could not be independently verified, the list is believed to have been printed on 3 December by Isis’s in-house publishers on behalf of the group’s “Research and Fatwa Department”.

It has been translated in detail by the Washington, DC-based Middle East Media Research Institute, and researchers at the anti-extremism thinktank Quilliam say it “can be traced back to some of [isis’s] most active propagandists”.

Researchers at the University of Bristol’s Gender and Violence Research Centre said last month that Isis had kidnapped more than 2,500 women belonging to the Yazidi religious minority in Syria and Iraq, while at least 4,600 are reported missing. The centre’s Nazand Begikhani told CNN the women are “treated like cattle”.

The pamphlet makes clear in excruciating detail exactly what this treatment involves – and how it is actively encouraged in Islam.

It explains that it is “permissible” to take non-Muslims captive, making particular mention of the kitabiyat or “People of the Book” – Jews and Christians.

It tells Isis fighters that the fact that “unbelief” in Islam is all that is required to make someone a slave – and clears up the controversy of “capturing apostate women” who were born as Muslims by saying: “the consensus leans towards forbidding it… we [isis] lean towards accepting the consensus”.

The rules for how militants should handle their slaves follow. Among the most shocking are that it is “permissible” to rape a female slave “immediately after taking possession of her” and that it is “permissible to have intercourse with the female slave who hasn't reached puberty if she is fit for intercourse”, without explanation of what that means.

Speaking to The Independent, Quilliam researcher Charlie Winter said: “The roots of this document can easily be traced back to some of Islamic State’s most active propagandists, something that leaves little doubt in my mind about its credibility.

“The content, while it is abhorrent and shocking, is not surprising – we know that IS ideologues have justified and legitimated slavery in past publications.”

The following is a selection of some of the questions and answers Isis has provided its followers:

Question 1: What is al-sabi?

"Al-Sabi is a woman from among ahl al-harb [the people of war] who has been captured by Muslims."

Question 2: What makes al-sabi permissible?

"What makes al-sabi permissible [i.e., what makes it permissible to take such a woman captive] is [her] unbelief. Unbelieving [women] who were captured and brought into the abode of Islam are permissible to us, after the imam distributes them [among us]."

Question 4: Is it permissible to have intercourse with a female captive?

"It is permissible to have sexual intercourse with the female captive. Allah the almighty said: '[successful are the believers] who guard their chastity, except from their wives or (the captives and slaves) that their right hands possess, for then they are free from blame [Koran 23:5-6]'..."

Question 5: Is it permissible to have intercourse with a female captive immediately after taking possession [of her]?

"If she is a virgin, he [her master] can have intercourse with her immediately after taking possession of her. However, is she isn't, her uterus must be purified [first]…"

Question 6: Is it permissible to sell a female captive?

"It is permissible to buy, sell, or give as a gift female captives and slaves, for they are merely property, which can be disposed of [as long as that doesn't cause [the Muslim ummah] any harm or damage."

Question 9: If the female captive was impregnated by her owner, can he then sell her?

"He can't sell her if she becomes the mother of a child..."

Question 13: Is it permissible to have intercourse with a female slave who has not reached puberty?

"It is permissible to have intercourse with the female slave who hasn't reached puberty if she is fit for intercourse; however if she is not fit for intercourse, then it is enough to enjoy her without intercourse."

Question 19: Is it permissible to beat a female slave?

"It is permissible to beat the female slave as a [form of] darb ta'deeb [disciplinary beating], [but] it is forbidden to [use] darb al-takseer [literally, breaking beating], [darb] al-tashaffi [beating for the purpose of achieving gratification], or [darb] al-ta'dheeb [torture beating]. Further, it is forbidden to hit the face."

Question 21: What is the earthly punishment of a female slave who runs away from her master?

"She [i.e. the female slave who runs away from her master] has no punishment according to the shari'a of Allah; however, she is [to be] reprimanded [in such a way that] deters others like her from escaping."

TheReligionofPeace.com

Guide to Understanding Islam

What does the

Religion of Peace

Teach About...

Slavery and Sex Slavery

Question:

Does Islam condone slavery?

Does Islamic teaching allow Muslim men to keep women as sex slaves?

Summary Answer:

Islam neither ignores nor condemns slavery.

In fact, a large part of the Sharia is dedicated to the practice.

Muslims are encouraged to live in the way of Muhammad, who was a slave owner and trader.

He captured slaves in battle. He had sex with his slaves. And he instructed his men to do the same. The Qur'an actually devotes more verses to making sure that Muslim men know they can keep women as sex slaves (4) than it does to telling them to pray five times a day (0).

The Qur'an:

Qur'an (33:50) - "O Prophet! We have made lawful to thee thy wives to whom thou hast paid their dowers; and those (slaves) whom thy right hand possesses out of the prisoners of war whom Allah has assigned to thee" This is one of several personal-sounding verses "from Allah" narrated by Muhammad - in this case allowing himself a virtually unlimited supply of sex partners. Other Muslims are restrained to four wives, but, following the example of their prophet, may also have sex with any number of slaves, as the following verse make clear:

Qur'an (23:5-6) - "..who abstain from sex, except with those joined to them in the marriage bond, or (the captives) whom their right hands possess..." This verse permits the slave-owner to have sex with his slaves. See also Qur'an (70:29-30). The Quran is a small book, so if Allah used valuable space to repeat the same point four times, then sex slavery must be very important to him.

Qur'an (4:24) - "And all married women (are forbidden unto you) save those (captives) whom your right hands possess." Even sex with married slaves is permissible.

Qur'an (8:69) - "But (now) enjoy what ye took in war, lawful and good" A reference to war booty, of which slaves were a part. The Muslim slave master may enjoy his "catch" because (according to verse 71) "Allah gave you mastery over them."

Qur'an (24:32) - "And marry those among you who are single and those who are fit among your male slaves and your female slaves..." Breeding slaves based on fitness.

Qur'an (2:178) - "O ye who believe! Retaliation is prescribed for you in the matter of the murdered; the freeman for the freeman, and the slave for the slave, and the female for the female." The message of this verse, which prescribes the rules of retaliation for murder, is that all humans are not created equal. The human value of a slave is less than that of a free person (and a woman's worth is also distinguished from that of a man's).

Qur'an (16:75) - "Allah sets forth the Parable (of two men: one) a slave under the dominion of another; He has no power of any sort; and (the other) a man on whom We have bestowed goodly favours from Ourselves, and he spends thereof (freely), privately and publicly: are the two equal? (By no means;) praise be to Allah." Yet another confirmation that the slave is is not equal to the master. In this case it is plain that the slave owes his status to Allah's will. (According to 16:71, the owner should be careful about insulting Allah by bestowing Allah's gifts on slaves - those whom the god of Islam has not favored).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...

In this news report one former slave woman who managed to escape tells how she was repeatedly raped for 3 months being bought and sold to many men. Another girl who is just 12 years old child was also raped by a 50 year old man. This is disturbing and sick.

http://www.nbcnews.com/storyline/isis-terror/isis-terror-yazidi-woman-recalls-horrors-slave-auction-n305856

Link to comment
Share on other sites

ISIS, Sunni Islam is absolute serious threat to humanity, islamic sharia ideology is even more dangerous. West has to be be deeply involved in Islam ideological affairs if they want to beat fascist islam, they can no longer ignore its not our problem.

West has to be deeply involved to break their fascist ideological belief. Ideological war fare is more important, they should be targeting mullahs, schools literature, fascist literature in islamic schools right from early by funding heavy moderate proper contexual interpretation of islam for example scholars- raza aslan among others etc. Absolute fascist one dimensional one liner black and white out of context interpretation of hadiths, quran other text is root problem has to be replaced by various proper metaphysical context.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Where are the Muslims of the west? They will protest at the drop of a hat if Israel does anyone against the Palestinians yet when an army of 30000 odd Muslims are murdering and raping Yazidis, Kurds and Shias in the name of their religion they stay silent. This can only mean that they know that what ISIS is doing is Islamic.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

ISIS/Sunni Islam is absolute serious threat to humanity, islamic sharia ideology is even more dangerous. West has to be be deeply involved in Islam ideological affairs if they want to beat fascist islam, they can no longer ignore its not our problem.

West has to be deeply involved to break their fascist ideological belief. Ideological war fare is more important, they should be targeting mullahs, schools literature, fascist literature in islamic schools right from early by funding heavy moderate proper contexual interpretation of islam for example scholars- raza aslan among others etc. Absolute fascist one dimensional one liner black and white out of context interpretation of hadiths, quran other text is root problem has to be replaced by various proper metaphysical context.

Neo the moderates are just one side of the same coin as the extremists. In fact the moderates you want to empower are more dangerous than the extremists because they lull non-Muslims into a false sense of security that Islam is just a normal religion instead of being the dangerous threat to humanity that it is.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This is disgusting

n a new propaganda video released Sunday by ISIS, the militant group claims to have beheaded over a dozen members of Egypt's Coptic Christian minority on a Libyan beach.

The highly produced video shows an apparent mass execution with jihadists in black standing behind each of the victims, who are all are dressed in orange jumpsuits with their hands cuffed behind them.

The five-minute video, released by the terror group's propaganda wing al-Hayat Media, includes a masked English-speaking jihadi who says, "The sea you have hidden Sheikh Osama bin Laden's body in, we swear to Allah, we will mix it with your blood."

Then on cue, all the victims are pushed to the ground and beheaded.

ISIS has imposed its brutal rule on the large areas of Iraq and Syria that it controls, but the beheadings of the Egyptians appears to have been carried out by an affiliate of the militant group in Libya.

Egypt's President Abdel Fattah el-Sisi confirmed in a statement that Egyptian "martyrs" had fallen victim to terrorism and expressed his condolences to the Egyptian people.

El-Sisi called for an urgent meeting of the Council of National Defense and declared seven days of official mourning.

Twenty-one Egyptian Christians were kidnapped in the Libyan coastal city of Sirte in two separate incidents in December and January. Officials said all of them had been killed.

http://www.cnn.com/2015/02/15/middleeast/isis-video-beheadings-christians/

Link to comment
Share on other sites

NOT the majority of Muslims, bare that in mind. Only the insane extremists preach and practice this.

I always find myself cringing slightly when elements from the leftist hyper-multicultural PC Brigade assert that the radical Muslim's views on the Koran are their misguided 'interpretations' of it.

'Interpretation', literally speaking, is the action of discerning a meaning in something. But that isn't what the fundamentalist Muslims are doing. They're taking what they read at face value. The only ones doing any 'interpreting' are the so called moderate Muslims, who read a passage which instructs them to 'kill the unbelievers wherever your may find them' and then sit around like ingrates scratching their heads and asking themselves "hmmmn well, what could that possibly mean?" What is so difficult to understand about destroy or kill or maim?
As for which reading of the Koran is the authentic one, the literal one of ISIS/terrorists, or the metaphorical one of the moderates, it could only ever be the former. Most of the people to whom Muhammad preached his new religion were illiterate goatherders and camelherders, people far too stupid and uneducated to discern any allegory or deep meaning in any of the things they were told. Knowing this, that everything he said would be taken literally by these people, Muhammad could only have said what he actually meant.
Therefore, when Muhammad enjoins his Muslims to "kill all unbelievers", what he really means to say by that is "kill all those goddamn unbelievers". In making slaves of the infidels, ISIS is simply fulfilling the edicts of the Prophet.
Moderate Muslims are delusional, and by their silence and inertia they make themselves enablers, complicit in the work of terrorists, warmongers and paedophiles. If they truly felt revolted by what ISIS were doing, they would have mobilised and made their contempt known by organising mass protests as they have time and time again over far more trivial things than this, for instance, the drawing of some cartoons. They even came out to protest when the Mcdonald's in Southall stopped its Halal trial run for God's sake. Hamburgers mean more to these people than the murder and rape of innocents or non-Muslims. The guilt belongs to all of them.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

It is amazing that given all the evil that Islam has brought to the world since Mohammed first thought it up that there are still Muslims around who claim that it is a religion of peace. The TV is full of these so-called moderate Muslims sprouting this lie and claiming such other nonsense as Mohammed was a mercy to mankind every time their is a Muslim terrorist attack. Either these people are liars and know full well that they are spreading lies to disarm non-Muslims or they are in denial and because they have been born into their religion they cannot tell the truth that they and their ancestors have been fooled into remaining in a religion that has brought so much evil to this world.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
 Share


  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • yeh it's true, we shouldn't be lazy and need to learn jhatka shikaar. It doesn't help some of grew up in surrounding areas like Slough and Southall where everyone thought it was super bad for amrit dharis to eat meat, and they were following Sant babas and jathas, and instead the Singhs should have been normalising jhatka just like the recent world war soldiers did. We are trying to rectifiy this and khalsa should learn jhatka.  But I am just writing about bhog for those that are still learning rehit. As I explained, there are all these negative influences in the panth that talk against rehit, but this shouldn't deter us from taking khanda pahul, no matter what level of rehit we are!
    • How is it going to help? The link is of a Sikh hunter. Fine, but what good does that do the lazy Sikh who ate khulla maas in a restaurant? By the way, for the OP, yes, it's against rehit to eat khulla maas.
    • Yeah, Sikhs should do bhog of food they eat. But the point of bhog is to only do bhog of food which is fit to be presented to Maharaj. It's not maryada to do bhog of khulla maas and pretend it's OK to eat. It's not. Come on, bro, you should know better than to bring this Sakhi into it. Is this Sikh in the restaurant accompanied by Guru Gobind Singh ji? Is he fighting a dharam yudh? Or is he merely filling his belly with the nearest restaurant?  Please don't make a mockery of our puratan Singhs' sacrifices by comparing them to lazy Sikhs who eat khulla maas.
    • Seriously?? The Dhadi is trying to be cute. For those who didn't get it, he said: "Some say Maharaj killed bakras (goats). Some say he cut the heads of the Panj Piyaras. The truth is that they weren't goats. It was she-goats (ਬਕਰੀਆਂ). He jhatka'd she-goats. Not he-goats." Wow. This is possibly the stupidest thing I've ever heard in relation to Sikhi.
    • Instead of a 9 inch or larger kirpan, take a smaller kirpan and put it (without gatra) inside your smaller turban and tie the turban tightly. This keeps a kirpan on your person without interfering with the massage or alarming the masseuse. I'm not talking about a trinket but rather an actual small kirpan that fits in a sheath (you'll have to search to find one). As for ahem, "problems", you could get a male masseuse. I don't know where you are, but in most places there are professional masseuses who actually know what they are doing and can really relieve your muscle pains.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use