Jump to content

Virk?


mrggg123
 Share

Recommended Posts

Rapists made 15 phone calls to each other during the journey from Leeds to Bradford to arrange the attack.
Tamseel-Virk-Azad-Raja-Najeem-Ulaseed-anVIEW GALLERY

Four predatory men - including a taxi driver, his uncle and nephew - were jailed for 68 years on Friday for raping a schoolteacher on a park bench after abducting and trafficking her from his cab.

The unconscious woman passed out after drinking at a birthday celebration before she came round to find one of her abusers having sex with her.

Private hire driver Tamseel Virk, 42; uncle and nephew, Azad Raja, 38, and Wakar Akhtar, 21, along with Najeem Ul-Saeed, 31, were convicted of the planned sex attack at Bradford Crown Court.

SWNSPAY-Tamseel-Virk.jpg
Jailed: Cabbie Tamseel Virk was sentenced to 17 years in prison

They were each locked up for 17 years as Judge Durham Hall told just three of them in the dock - Akhtar is on the run, fleeing the country after giving his evidence -: "This was totally despicable, it was utterly callous, it was a degree of inhuman behaviour hard, even for one such as myself inured to evil, to understand."

The woman was driven from Leeds to Bradford during which time 15 phone calls were made between the rapists, arranging the attack.

The assault happened in May when the drunk woman got in a taxi, which had not been flagged to his HQ, in breach of his licence, at around midnight.

The victim was 'noticeably affected' after drinking lager and whisky in a pub with friends, 'talking gibberish' and left her jacket, handbag and phone behind.

She was dropped off near their home and raped in turn on a bench in Great Horton Park, Bradford, while she was unconscious.

Prosecutor Andrew Kershaw said: "They manhandled her, causing bruises and minor injuries to both of her knees, as if she were put in a kneeling position on the ground."

The jury was told the victim woke up while Raja was having sex with her. Akhtar is alleged to have told her he had already had sex with her.

Ul-Saeed then turned up 'too late physically to join in the rape that he had set up.'

SWNSPAY-Wakar-Akhtar.jpg
Guilty: Akhtar was sent down for 17 years

Describing her ordeal, the woman said: "I had been planning to settle down and start and family with my partner of four years.

"Following the 25th I felt I had the identity and everything I had worked for kicked out of me.

"Something so horrific and personal has happened.

"I do believe I won't let what's happened get the better of me."

I thought virk was only a sikh name?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Virk is a prominent Jatt clan, Jatts are an ethnic people found on the Northern Indian subcontinent. Jatts are diverse in religious affiliations and are Muslims, Sikhs and Hindus. In this case these individuals are Muslims, nothing to do with Sikhs so please delete or move this thread.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Virk is a prominent Jatt clan, Jatts are an ethnic people found on the Northern Indian subcontinent. Jatts are diverse in religious affiliations and are Muslims, Sikhs and Hindus. In this case these individuals are Muslims, nothing to do with Sikhs so please delete or move this thread.

Yes Jatt surnames very rarely overlap with Hindus but every Jatt surname found among Sikhs is also found among the Mulsim Jatts in Pakistan and, lets not forget, there are more Muslim jatts than there are Sikh jatts.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Virk are a mainly Sikh Jat got but in Gujranwala and Sialkot there were a number of Muslim Virks as well although they were still less than the Sikh Virks there. The fact that this paedophile is involved in grooming shows that Pakistani grooming is not a problem of Mirpuris but also involves Pakistani Punjabis as well.

How is it that these Pakistani Jats and Punjabis are involved in grooming but the same is not the case for Sikh or Hindu Jats or Punjabi? It has to the religion that made him a Paedophile just as is the case with what the Islamic State is doing in Iraq and Syria.

The most disgusting bit is that even if one of these guys for whatever reason displays tendency to commit rape who is it that he is not only able to discuss such a subject with his uncle and nephew and also have them join him in the rape? Apologies but can any of you guys imagine something like this happening in our communities or even our own families? Would you be able to discuss committing such a vile act with your uncle or nephew and even get them involved? This just shows what sick individuals these are as well as what a sick community they belong to. Committing rape didn't just occur to Virk on the spur of the moment otherwise he would have just raped the woman himself but he and his relatives must have discussed this before or even committed other rapes for him to be able to just phone his relatives up and get them involved.

Also can any of you imagine that other family members not directly involved in the rape would have been unaware of their activities? There is a culture of silence in the Pakistani community because these paedos are only raping non-Muslim girls and not those of their own religion and this is never discussed because the mainstream media as well as the politicians think that Pakistanis are like the British who usually don't even talk to or know their own neighbours. Every Pakistani knows what his community is up to but they keep quiet because it's just the kafir girls getting raped.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Virk are a mainly Sikh Jat got but in Gujranwala and Sialkot there were a number of Muslim Virks as well although they were still less than the Sikh Virks there.

What kind of nonsense wikipedia and second rate internet articles are you getting your facts from ? You've clearly taken your facts from some website wrtten by an imbecile that was fixated on the gujranwala area but was totally oblivious to the multitude of Virk villages in muslim dominated doaba and vast areas of malwa.

Virk is one of the most numerous muslim jatt clans in Pakistan. I don't know much about gujranwala and sialkot but the ones that migrated from doaba in 1947 now occupy many villages and whole tehsils in district faisalabad for example and the same for the ones that migrated from malwa.

I have no doubt whatsoever, that there are more muslim jatts who are Virk than there are Sikh jatts who are Virk.

Now, tell me why I should take the rest of your post seriously when you start your very first paragraph with innacurate non-facts ?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

There were 20,000 Virks in Gujranwala in 1901 (included parts of what became Sheikhupura district) out of a total 46,000. The district which had the second highest Virk population of 6931 was Lahore (also included parts of what became Sheikhupura district) and the third highest was Sialkot with 3096. The area around the Nili bar jungle was the Virk heartland. Considering that 65% of the Virk population was concentrated in these areas then any writing about the Virks would mention these areas. Just because you knew some Virks in Doaba does not mean that they are relevant to a discussion on Virks.

Religion wise the only data based on gots is 1901 which prior to the conversion of the the mass of Hindu Jats to Sikhism. Virks were virtually unknown in the area that became Haryana in 1901. In 1901 the Virks wers split 21,000 Muslims, 18500 Sikhs and 6500 Hindus. Although at the time the Muslims were more than the Sikhs but the increase in the number of Jats by religion in the Virk heartland of Gujranwala between 1901 and 1931 was - Sikh Jats increased 275%,, Hindus decreased by 73% and the Muslims increased by 76%. So it is highly likely that the Hindu Virks from this area became Sikhs just as the other Hindus Jats were doing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Virk are a mainly Sikh Jat got but in Gujranwala and Sialkot there were a number of Muslim Virks as well although they were still less than the Sikh Virks there. The fact that this paedophile is involved in grooming shows that Pakistani grooming is not a problem of Mirpuris but also involves Pakistani Punjabis as well.

How is it that these Pakistani Jats and Punjabis are involved in grooming but the same is not the case for Sikh or Hindu Jats or Punjabi? It has to the religion that made him a Paedophile just as is the case with what the Islamic State is doing in Iraq and Syria.

The most disgusting bit is that even if one of these guys for whatever reason displays tendency to commit rape who is it that he is not only able to discuss such a subject with his uncle and nephew and also have them join him in the rape? Apologies but can any of you guys imagine something like this happening in our communities or even our own families? Would you be able to discuss committing such a vile act with your uncle or nephew and even get them involved? This just shows what sick individuals these are as well as what a sick community they belong to. Committing rape didn't just occur to Virk on the spur of the moment otherwise he would have just raped the woman himself but he and his relatives must have discussed this before or even committed other rapes for him to be able to just phone his relatives up and get them involved.

Also can any of you imagine that other family members not directly involved in the rape would have been unaware of their activities? There is a culture of silence in the Pakistani community because these paedos are only raping non-Muslim girls and not those of their own religion and this is never discussed because the mainstream media as well as the politicians think that Pakistanis are like the British who usually don't even talk to or know their own neighbours. Every Pakistani knows what his community is up to but they keep quiet because it's just the kafir girls getting raped.

Do you have any evidence that he's Pakistani Punjabi? Mirpuris also have the surname Virk as there are lots of Jatts amongst them. You also get Sikhs and Hindus involved in this, too, btw:

Sajad Ali, 34, Asif Hussain, 33, Ashad Jani, 33, Jerome Joe, 35, Akbari Khan, 35, Taimoor Khan, 28, Sohail Qamar, 40, Vikram Singh, 45, Harmohan Nangpal, 40, Faisal Iqbal, 32, Mohammed Imran, 38 and Farrukh Bashir

http://www.buckinghamtoday.co.uk/news/more-news/child-sex-offences-accused-appear-at-old-bailey-1-6448724

Sandeep Kumar and Jaskaran Ghuman, both of Clarendon Avenue, claimed their sexual activity with the teenager had been with her consent.

But a jury at Warwick Crown Court at Warwickshire Justice Centre on Friday rejected their versions of what happened and convicted Kumar, 28, of two charges of rape and Ghuman, 23, of one charge.

http://www.kenilworthweeklynews.co.uk/news/local-news/two-leamington-men-jailed-for-raping-18-year-old-escort-1-6271255

Bharat Modhwadia, 25, of Wycombe Road, was jailed for 16 months for paying for the sexual services of a child, inciting child pornography, and trafficking the girl by driving her to a location for sex. Judge Pert acknowledged that he had initially advised the girl not to have sex for money, but this did not ultimately stop him from "taking advantage of her".

Chandresh Mistry, 37, of Berridge Lane, was jailed for eight months for attempting to pay for the sexual services of a child. He used Facebook to arrange to have sex with the girl, but they did not have sex because he became aware of the police investigation.

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-23896937

A pair of workmen who raped a prostitute at the house they were developing have been sent to prison after a jury found them guilty of the brutal attack.

Arvinder Singh, 22, of Oakwood Road, Southall, was jailed for eight years and Karnail Singh, 36, of no fixed address, was sentenced to seven years. Both will be deported from the UK after serving half of their sentence.

http://www.getwestlondon.co.uk/news/local-news/rapist-workmen-jailed-6016543

Puppy Parmar and Sandeep Chauhan now face being deported after being sentenced to a total of almost 14 years.

The pair were said to use their 16-year-old victim as a "sexual plaything" and were told by a judge how their crimes were "so heinous", their staying in the UK would be to the "detriment of society".

http://www.blackpoolgazette.co.uk/news/local/two-jailed-for-teen-s-gang-rape-1-371018

Two Sikh priests have been jailed for a total of 12 years for raping a 26-year-old Glasgow prostitute after she refused to have sex with them.

Gurnam Singh, 30, was sentenced to seven years and Sukhdev Singh, 36, to five. Both will be placed on the sex offenders register indefinitely.

A MAN who groomed a 14-year-old girl before plying her with alcohol and sexually assaulting her in his house has been jailed for 12 years.

Harjaskaran Singh, of Trelawney Avenue, Langley, was told he would serve a minimum of eight years behind bars, with an extended licence of four years, at Reading Crown Court on Friday (4).

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-scotland-glasgow-west-20445350

Akshay Kumar, 38, admitted one count of causing a person under the age of 18 to be involved in pornography and was jailed for two years and 10 months.

http://www.theguardian.com/uk/2010/nov/25/derby-men-guilty-sexually-abusing-girls

Vinayak Rama, who is 29, of Kashmir Road, and 29-year-old Reynold Carvalho, of Prestwold Road, were sentenced today after pleading guilty at an earlier hearing.

Rama admitted to two counts of rape, and was handed 10 years and six months in prison. Carvalho pleaded guilty to oral rape and was jailed for eight years and three months. Both men have also been placed on the Sex Offenders Register.

They raped the 12-year-old after befriending her in Holden Street, Leicester, on 1 October 2013. She was raped in a car by Rama on two occasions and subjected to oral rape by Carvalho.

http://www.itv.com/news/central/update/2014-07-11/two-men-jailed-for-18-years-for-raping-12-year-old-girl/

I could point out that East Punjab has a much bigger gang rape and female infanticide problem than West Punjab, and then say "What's the difference? It's the religion" but I won't because that's just stupid.

British Mirpuris are a quite messed up community yes, but not British Pakistanis as a whole. There's a huge difference between Mirpuris and people who come from Central Punjab, Karachi etc. If you did your research you'll actually find that Mirpuris are severely looked down at by other British Pakistani communities: Look at these links (It's a Mirpuri run website)

http://www.portmir.org.uk/pages/sample-1---trash-attacks.html http://www.portmir.org.uk/pages/sample-2---trash-attacks-2.html http://www.portmir.org.uk/pages/sample-3---trash-attacks-2.html

Also, the notion that they don't target their own Muslim girls has been disproven. Read this: http://www.mwnuk.co.uk/go_files/resources/UnheardVoices.pdf You'll actually find they find it easier to target their own girls because of the notion of 'honour' etc where girls keep silent. It's nothing to do with targeting girls from other religions since they do it to their own as well.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Q: Why is society blaming these Muslim Jatts for following Islam, Muhammad & the Quran?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OTeAB4l0KCM

Prophet Muhammad : A Pedophile

Muhammad “married” Aisha when she was six years old.

'A'isha (Allah be pleased with her) reported: Allah's Apostle (may peace be upon him) married me when I was six years old, and I was admitted to his house when I was nine years old. Muslim 8. 3310

Narrated 'Aisha:that the Prophet married her when she was six years old and he sexually consummated his marriage when she was nine years old, and then she remained with him for nine years (i.e., till his death). Bukhari 7. 62. 64

Narrated 'Aisha:that the Prophet married her when she was six years old and he sexually consummated his marriage when she was nine years old. Hisham said: I have been informed that 'Aisha remained with the Prophet for nine years (i.e. till his death)." what you know of the Quran (by heart)' Bukhari 7. 62. 65

Narrated 'Ursa:The Prophet wrote the (marriage contract) with 'Aisha while she was six years old and sexually consummated his marriage with her while she was nine years old and she remained with him for nine years (i.e. till his death). Bukhari 7. 62. 88

Arab year is lunar, which is shorter than solar year. In solar years, Aisha was 8 years 9 months old when Muhammad consummated his marriage with her. Consummate? This is a nice way to say raped her. According to Muslims, a woman must consent to her marriage or the marriage is null. How can a 6-years old child consent to her marriage? Without a consent, how can we call this relationship between a 51 years old man and a 6-years old child marriage?

Some Muslims claim that it was Abu Bakr who approached Muhammad asking him to marry his daughter. This is not true.

The Prophet asked Abu Bakr for 'Aisha's hand in marriage. Abu Bakr said "But I am your brother." The Prophet said, "You are my brother in Allah's religion and His Book, but she (Aisha) is lawful for me to marry." Bukhari 7.62.18

Even though Abu Bakr was fool enough to let Muhammad have sex with his little daughter, that marriage was invalid, because the only person who should have given consent was a minor. Aisha was unaware of what was going on and was surprised when pedophile Prophet Muhammad pulled down his pants and invited her to sit on his lap. She Narrated:

When the Prophet married me, my mother came to me and made me enter the house (of the Prophet) and nothing surprised me but the coming of Allah's Apostle to me in the forenoon. Bukhari 7. 62. 90

Aisha was playing with dolls like any other 8 year old child would do. She was not ready for marriage and had no understanding of it.

Narrated 'Aisha:
I used to play with the dolls in the presence of the Prophet, and my girl friends also used to play with me. When Allah's Apostle used to enter (my dwelling place) they used to hide themselves, but the Prophet would call them to join and play with me. (The playing with the dolls and similar images is forbidden, but it was allowed for 'Aisha at that time, as she was a little girl, not yet reached the age of puberty.) (Fateh-al-Bari page 143, Vol.13) Bukhari 8. 73.151

Narrated Aisha:
The Prophet engaged me when I was a girl of six (years). We went to Medina and stayed at the home of Bani-al-Harith bin Khazraj. Then I got ill and my hair fell down. Later on my hair grew (again) and my mother, Um Ruman, came to me while I was playing in a swing with some of my girl friends. She called me, and I went to her, not knowing what she wanted to do to me. She caught me by the hand and made me stand at the door of the house. I was breathless then, and when my breathing became Allright, she took some water and rubbed my face and head with it. Then she took me into the house. There in the house I saw some Ansari women who said, "Best wishes and Allah's Blessing and a good luck." Then she entrusted me to them and they prepared me (for the marriage). Unexpectedly Allah's Apostle came to me in the forenoon and my mother handed me over to him, and at that time I was a girl of nine years of age. Bukhari 5.234

Having sexual feelings for small children is called pedophilia. According to Ayatollah Montazeri, the most revered Shiite cleric of Iran , the “marriage” of Muhammad and Aisha was a political maneuver to placate the enemies of Islam. He wrote: The reason for this marriage was that the Prophet was under the intense pressure by his enemies like Abu Lahab and Abu Jahl and was completely dependant of the protection of other tribes. Abu Bakr had a lot of tribal influence. And rejecting his offer, in those conditions, for the Prophet was not prudent. In reality this marriage was symbolic and not to satisfy his sexual instinct, because, as a rule a 53-year-old man cannot have sexual feelings for a 9-year-old girl.

This is nonsense. Abu Bakr was already a devout follower of Muhammad and his confidant. Abu Lahab and Abul Hakam (whom Muhammad derogatorily called Abu Jahl, father of ignorance) had nothing to do with Abu Bakr. How can having sex with a child placate one's enemies? Assuming this ridiculous excuse is true, what about Aisha? Was she only a pawn for Muhammad’s political maneuvers?

In one thing the Grand Ayatollah is right. As a rule a 53-year-old man cannot have sexual feelings for a 9-year-old girl, unless he is a pedophile.

The Islamocritic scholar, Abul Kasem, has demonstrated that in Islam there is actually no age limit for marrying a child. He found the following hadith which shows a Muslim man can marry an infant. However should one of his adult wives suckle that infant both wives become haram to him.

Case of one of two wives suckling the other-If a man marry an infant and an adult and the latter should give milk to the former, both wives become prohibited with respect to that man [their husband], because if they were to continue united in marriage to him, it would imply the propriety of joint cohabitation with the foster-mother and her foster-daughter, which is prohibited, in the same manner as joint cohabitation with a natural mother and daughter-It is to be observed on this occasion, that if the husband should not have had carnal connexion with the adult wife, she is not entitled to any dower whatever, because the separation has proceeded from her, before consummation :-but the infant has a claim to her half dower. [Hedaya Vol. I Book III, page 71 (Ref. 6)]

Abul Kasem also quoted the story of Umar marrying a child just four or five years old.

Umme Kulthum was 4 or 5 years old when Caliph Umar married her. This child was his most favourite wife (just like prophet Mohammad). There is a great controversy about the identity of this child bride of Umar. Many scholars claim that she was the daughter of Ali and Fatima. Others say that Umme Kulthum was the posthumous daughter of Abu Bakar and Habiba. Abu Bakar died (13 A.H.) a few months before Umme Kulthum was born. She was the half sister of Aisha. So, Umar asked Aisha for the hand of Umme Kulthum when she (Umme Kulthum) was only 4 - 5 years old. Aisha agreed and Umar and Umme Kulthum got married.

According to Abul Kasem’s calculations, Umar was 56 years old when he married this little girl. Why would he not wait for Umme Kulthum to reach the age of nine? Shouldn’t Umar follow the sunna (example) of his prophet? The answer is that Muhammad did not set any limits for child marriage. Ummar must have remembered when Muhammad expressed his desire to marry a crawling baby before death overtook him. This story is reported by Ibn Ishak, the most authentic biographer of Muhammad. Most other biographies are based on this monumental work of Ibn Ishak/Ibn Hisham

(Suhayli, ii.79: In the riwaya of Yunus I.I recorded that the apostle saw her (Ummu’l-Fadl) when she was baby crawling before him and said, ‘If she grows up and I am still alive I will marry her.’ But he died before she grew up and Sufyan b. al-Aswad b. Abdu’l-Asad al-Makhzumi married her and she bore him Rizq and Lubaba….(Ref.3, page 311)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Mr 123 you have with intention tried to Show Sikhs as groomers. You have failed as that virk guy inthe article is muslim

. From your other posts on this subject you sympathised with Pakistan groomers and said People from our community in Southall are doing they same, this is a lie. Your are so also condemned those who highlight grooming and stand up for thosr that do it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
 Share


  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • yeh it's true, we shouldn't be lazy and need to learn jhatka shikaar. It doesn't help some of grew up in surrounding areas like Slough and Southall where everyone thought it was super bad for amrit dharis to eat meat, and they were following Sant babas and jathas, and instead the Singhs should have been normalising jhatka just like the recent world war soldiers did. We are trying to rectifiy this and khalsa should learn jhatka.  But I am just writing about bhog for those that are still learning rehit. As I explained, there are all these negative influences in the panth that talk against rehit, but this shouldn't deter us from taking khanda pahul, no matter what level of rehit we are!
    • How is it going to help? The link is of a Sikh hunter. Fine, but what good does that do the lazy Sikh who ate khulla maas in a restaurant? By the way, for the OP, yes, it's against rehit to eat khulla maas.
    • Yeah, Sikhs should do bhog of food they eat. But the point of bhog is to only do bhog of food which is fit to be presented to Maharaj. It's not maryada to do bhog of khulla maas and pretend it's OK to eat. It's not. Come on, bro, you should know better than to bring this Sakhi into it. Is this Sikh in the restaurant accompanied by Guru Gobind Singh ji? Is he fighting a dharam yudh? Or is he merely filling his belly with the nearest restaurant?  Please don't make a mockery of our puratan Singhs' sacrifices by comparing them to lazy Sikhs who eat khulla maas.
    • Seriously?? The Dhadi is trying to be cute. For those who didn't get it, he said: "Some say Maharaj killed bakras (goats). Some say he cut the heads of the Panj Piyaras. The truth is that they weren't goats. It was she-goats (ਬਕਰੀਆਂ). He jhatka'd she-goats. Not he-goats." Wow. This is possibly the stupidest thing I've ever heard in relation to Sikhi.
    • Instead of a 9 inch or larger kirpan, take a smaller kirpan and put it (without gatra) inside your smaller turban and tie the turban tightly. This keeps a kirpan on your person without interfering with the massage or alarming the masseuse. I'm not talking about a trinket but rather an actual small kirpan that fits in a sheath (you'll have to search to find one). As for ahem, "problems", you could get a male masseuse. I don't know where you are, but in most places there are professional masseuses who actually know what they are doing and can really relieve your muscle pains.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use