Jump to content

Intercaste Marriage - Jat Sikh Girl Vs Ramgharia Boy


Sbhullar
 Share

Recommended Posts

Wow. This thread's deteriorated fast since I stopped posting on it.

My advice then to the OP: Stop keeping boyfriends. It just makes half of our community, inlcuding me, look down on and have a low opinion of you and your family. Especially your family.

Instead, ask your family to find you a suitable Gursikh husband, but reiterate that he must, in the interest of Sikhi and anticaste, be a Ramgharia, Khatri, chamar or bhatra or something. Not a jatt.

Happy days. We're all winners then and we're all happy. The only people that won't be happy of course are the ones (many of whom are here amongst us now) who are from families where their sisters or daughters keep boyfriends. They like to bury their heads in the sand and pretend that more than half of our 'community' don't laugh at them, look down on them and see them as kanjar parvaars. So, apart from them we all, incuding you and your parents, will be happy. Happy days indeed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Stop calling yourself a Khalsa if you are still a caste ridden individual.Quite shameful of you following double standards.

I just demonstrated to you that 'Jatt' is not a caste. It is an ethnic group.

And even if it was a caste, the Guru Sahibaan, who abhorred the caste system, still said they were Khatris and described themselves as Khatris. Are you going to accuse your own Gurus of following double standards too?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

^Bro, our Guru Sahib were not Khatri as they had no caste + they hated the caste system.

Our Guru Sahibaan all emphasised repeatedly on "kul nash" = the importance of having no lineage pride.

I believe that u are an honest Gursikh and don't see yourself as superior to any other Sikh.

So i can understand that u view Jatts as an ethnic tribe as opposed to an occupational caste.

But tribe (if u don't mind me saying as I like most ur posts) still comes under the radar of being destroyed by kul nash.

http://sikhinstitute.org/akal_takht08/baljika.html

Link to comment
Share on other sites

^Bro, our Guru Sahib were not Khatri as they had no caste + they hated the caste system.

Our Guru Sahibaan all emphasised repeatedly on "kul nash" = the importance of having no lineage pride.

I believe that u are an honest Gursikh and don't see yourself as superior to any other Sikh.

So i can understand that u view Jatts as an ethnic tribe as opposed to an occupational caste.

But tribe (if u don't mind me saying as I like most ur posts) still comes under the radar of being destroyed by kul nash.

http://sikhinstitute.org/akal_takht08/baljika.html

I agree entirely. I take no pride in or place any stock in my being a Jatt, I just acknowledged that I am of Jatt ancestry, as the Guru Sahibaan were of Khatri ancestry. This is not an opinion, just a fact. I couldn't change it even if I wanted to.

But I'll be damned if anyone tells me I should stop calling myself a Khalsa, as a brother above did. It is my right.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
 Share


  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt


×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use