Jump to content

Who Will You Vote For In May?


Hammertime007
 Share

Recommended Posts

Your pathetic. Your speal is used by Sikhs who have ni discipline. Modern day British Slags.

There is no party with Silkh interests at heart. We will have to fight for our rights. Democracy will always dissapoint.

Your spiel is commonly used by Sikhs who wanna embrace everything western because it's trendy.

With respect, you talk about having discipline and in the same sentence are calling me pathetic, grow up son, in a debate, people have different opinions, and as far as being in the club of "Sikhs who wanna embrace everything western because it's trendy", sorry, far too old for that trendy stuff.

As far as Sikh interests at heart, what exactly do you want, we can't even look after our own and yet we're making demands from political parties, who, by the way, will make any old promises to get your vote.

If you have such a issue with democracy maybe you should move to India and see how that goes or better still, try China, they don't like democracy over there so you may fit in.

I don't generally get offended by stuff people write online, but I make an exception when someone i don't know think's they can judge me, there's only one who can do that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You obviously realise demanding anything from politicians is futile so why vote? I hope you realise it's voters like you are begging politicians and kissing their bums. You are a seriously confused uncle. I have not regret in offending you.

With respect, you talk about having discipline and in the same sentence are calling me pathetic, grow up son, in a debate, people have different opinions, and as far as being in the club of "Sikhs who wanna embrace everything western because it's trendy", sorry, far too old for that trendy stuff.

As far as Sikh interests at heart, what exactly do you want, we can't even look after our own and yet we're making demands from political parties, who, by the way, will make any old promises to get your vote.

If you have such a issue with democracy maybe you should move to India and see how that goes or better still, try China, they don't like democracy over there so you may fit in.

I don't generally get offended by stuff people write online, but I make an exception when someone i don't know think's they can judge me, there's only one who can do that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You obviously realise demanding anything from politicians is futile so why vote? I hope you realise it's voters like you are begging politicians and kissing their bums. You are a seriously confused uncle. I have not regret in offending you.

Oh, you didn't offend me, i said i take exception when someone i don't know think's they can judge me, I'd hardly call what you wrote judgemental.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's impossible not to be judgemental unless you're a cabbage. Again your just throwing western nonsense at me uncle Ji.

Oh, you didn't offend me, i said i take exception when someone i don't know think's they can judge me, I'd hardly call what you wrote judgemental.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Don't vote Lib\Lab\Con vote UKIP, with Uppal make him unemployed on Friday!

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3068429/Labour-sexism-row-men-women-segregated-party-rally-critics-accuse-selling-values-votes.html

Fury at Labour's segregated rally: Sexism row after senior party figures attend Birmingham election meeting where Muslim men and women are seated separately
  • Picture from Birmingham rally shows men and women sitting apart in hall
  • Labour sources say it wasn't enforced but allowed Muslim women to attend
  • Critics call decision 'sickening' and say party will 'do anything for votes'
  • MP who fought against segregation in schools was centre stage at event
  • Khalid Mahmood said: 'Nobody was told to sit anywhere. It just happened'

By Daniel Martin Chief Political Correspondent For The Daily Mail and Martin Robinson for MailOnline

Published: 10:37, 5 May 2015 | Updated: 16:16, 5 May 2015

1.8k shares

1k

View comments

Labour faces a sexism row today after it defended the decision to segregate Muslim men and women at a party rally at an Islamic centre.

Senior party figures, including Liam Byrne, Tom Watson and Harriet Harman's husband Jack Dromey, spoke at the event in Birmingham on Saturday even though men sat on one side of the room and women on the other.

Labour has denied that people were forced to sit separately based on gender - even though photographs from the event show that the groups were clearly segregated.

Critics called the decision 'sickening' and claimed that the party was 'selling values for votes' in order to get Ed Miliband into Downing Street.

Scroll down for video

28543A1500000578-3068429-image-a-9_14308
+7

Row: Men and women sat apart at a Labour-run event in Birmingham on Saturday, which critics said had no 'place in modern Britain'

2853F52700000578-3068429-image-a-10_1430
+7

Among those on the panel were Tom Watson, fer left, Liam Byrne, centre left, and Jack Dromey, centre right, – the husband of Labour's deputy leader and ardent feminist Harriet Harman

Among the Labour grandees at the event was Khalid Mahmood, who is standing to be MP for Perry Bar on Thursday.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Don't vote Lib\Lab\Con vote UKIP, with Uppal make him unemployed on Friday!

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3068429/Labour-sexism-row-men-women-segregated-party-rally-critics-accuse-selling-values-votes.html

Fury at Labour's segregated rally: Sexism row after senior party figures attend Birmingham election meeting where Muslim men and women are seated separately

  • Picture from Birmingham rally shows men and women sitting apart in hall
  • Labour sources say it wasn't enforced but allowed Muslim women to attend
  • Critics call decision 'sickening' and say party will 'do anything for votes'
  • MP who fought against segregation in schools was centre stage at event
  • Khalid Mahmood said: 'Nobody was told to sit anywhere. It just happened'
By Daniel Martin Chief Political Correspondent For The Daily Mail and Martin Robinson for MailOnline

Published: 10:37, 5 May 2015 | Updated: 16:16, 5 May 2015

1.8k shares

1k

View comments

Labour faces a sexism row today after it defended the decision to segregate Muslim men and women at a party rally at an Islamic centre.

Senior party figures, including Liam Byrne, Tom Watson and Harriet Harman's husband Jack Dromey, spoke at the event in Birmingham on Saturday even though men sat on one side of the room and women on the other.

Labour has denied that people were forced to sit separately based on gender - even though photographs from the event show that the groups were clearly segregated.

Critics called the decision 'sickening' and claimed that the party was 'selling values for votes' in order to get Ed Miliband into Downing Street.

Scroll down for video

28543A1500000578-3068429-image-a-9_14308

+7

Row: Men and women sat apart at a Labour-run event in Birmingham on Saturday, which critics said had no 'place in modern Britain'

2853F52700000578-3068429-image-a-10_1430

+7

Among those on the panel were Tom Watson, fer left, Liam Byrne, centre left, and Jack Dromey, centre right, the husband of Labour's deputy leader and ardent feminist Harriet Harman

Among the Labour grandees at the event was Khalid Mahmood, who is standing to be MP for Perry Bar on Thursday.

What a shallow reason to support ukip. How old are you?

Terrible governance by libs/lab/cons isn't reason to collaborate with the majority of indeginous facists of this country and support a common party (ukip).

Ukip like any other political party will pander to the whim of the majority of their support... who happen to by the former supporters of the now underground bnp/nf.

If there is nobody worthy of ur vote its better not to vote then give ur vote to a party supported largely by racists.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
 Share


  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • yeh it's true, we shouldn't be lazy and need to learn jhatka shikaar. It doesn't help some of grew up in surrounding areas like Slough and Southall where everyone thought it was super bad for amrit dharis to eat meat, and they were following Sant babas and jathas, and instead the Singhs should have been normalising jhatka just like the recent world war soldiers did. We are trying to rectifiy this and khalsa should learn jhatka.  But I am just writing about bhog for those that are still learning rehit. As I explained, there are all these negative influences in the panth that talk against rehit, but this shouldn't deter us from taking khanda pahul, no matter what level of rehit we are!
    • How is it going to help? The link is of a Sikh hunter. Fine, but what good does that do the lazy Sikh who ate khulla maas in a restaurant? By the way, for the OP, yes, it's against rehit to eat khulla maas.
    • Yeah, Sikhs should do bhog of food they eat. But the point of bhog is to only do bhog of food which is fit to be presented to Maharaj. It's not maryada to do bhog of khulla maas and pretend it's OK to eat. It's not. Come on, bro, you should know better than to bring this Sakhi into it. Is this Sikh in the restaurant accompanied by Guru Gobind Singh ji? Is he fighting a dharam yudh? Or is he merely filling his belly with the nearest restaurant?  Please don't make a mockery of our puratan Singhs' sacrifices by comparing them to lazy Sikhs who eat khulla maas.
    • Seriously?? The Dhadi is trying to be cute. For those who didn't get it, he said: "Some say Maharaj killed bakras (goats). Some say he cut the heads of the Panj Piyaras. The truth is that they weren't goats. It was she-goats (ਬਕਰੀਆਂ). He jhatka'd she-goats. Not he-goats." Wow. This is possibly the stupidest thing I've ever heard in relation to Sikhi.
    • Instead of a 9 inch or larger kirpan, take a smaller kirpan and put it (without gatra) inside your smaller turban and tie the turban tightly. This keeps a kirpan on your person without interfering with the massage or alarming the masseuse. I'm not talking about a trinket but rather an actual small kirpan that fits in a sheath (you'll have to search to find one). As for ahem, "problems", you could get a male masseuse. I don't know where you are, but in most places there are professional masseuses who actually know what they are doing and can really relieve your muscle pains.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use