Jump to content

Pakhandian Ne Paya "maun Vrat Akhand Path" Da Bharam


Recommended Posts

  • 1 month later...
  • 2 weeks later...

Bir'ay I think the reason Sarbjit Singh Khalsa (Dhunda) is disliked by Derawad Sant Samaj fans is the following video.

In it Dhunda was arguing that Sri Anandpur Sahib as the birthplace of the Khalsa Panth should hold more importance to Sikhs than yatra's and that Vaisakhi 1699 is absolutely central to what Dhan Dhan Guru Gobind Singh Ji Maharaj's life history means to the Khalsa Panth (as opposed to the Dusht Daman theory supposedly in a previous life).

So I think we should accord all our fellow Sikhs respect regardless of if Sri Anandpur Sahib is more resonant to them or if they prefer to go on yatra's, as we need to be mature enough to "agree to disagree" respectfully on such issues.

Im not a "derawad sant samaj fan" for a start. I also dont do yatras or believe in any such pilgrimages.

I am strongly against dhunda. You got that right :) reasons? The guys a phony. A self proclaimed professor who disrespects Sri Dasam Granth Sahib. Dont think I need any other reasons. His a clown. His not a singh since he doesnt recognise Sri Jaap Sabib, Tav Prasad Savaiye and Benti Chaupai Sahib... just dhunda the clown.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

He is a heretic. In order to misguide the Sangat he lies about his qualifications.

Veerji how qualified are you to call someone you don't personally know a 'heretic'? Let me enlighten you with what the word professor means. It is a Latin origin word which originated in around 1350. In Latin prōfessor is one who has taken the vows of a religious order. It also refers to (in Latin) a public lecturer. So the point that he lies about his qualifications falls flat on floor. He holds a diploma from a government registered college. Which college gives title of bhramgyani, 108, sant, etc.? lol

What has he misguided sangat on? Getting intoxicated with bhang and calling oneself guru-di-fauj, thats an actual lie. The so called brhamgyanis,sants-who are completely uneducated and 5th grade passouts- who leave no stone unturned to lecture about non-sensical sakhis which carry no practical meaning. The so called deras (run by uneducated class) who have not done anything for panth but take it a sorry state of affairs. This is real heresy and lie.

And this maun vrat. This is misguiding. What would maun vrat serve a purpose if no one can listen to gurbani? Its a complete pakhand started by actual heretics. And since when do sikhs start using the Lutheranism era terminology to dissuade anyone against pakhand. Back then, anybody who challenged the pakhand in church was declared heretic. Martin Luther was proved right later. Please read his 95 theses or take some university level scientific history course. Galileo was convicted of heresy when he questioned the geocentric model of universe as explained by Bible. Church officials became more powerful than Bible and people shifted away from interpretation of Bible. Whatever church wished they did. Same thing is happening today. These pakhandis, sants, bhramgyanis, sadhs, etc. have hijacked Sikhi. And people are being convicted to heresy as you just pronounced your verdict. Is it a dictatorship that if one doesn't believe in the imposed belief one is a liar? Alas, human intelligence is way overstated.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Bir'ay I think the reason Sarbjit Singh Khalsa (Dhunda) is disliked by Derawad Sant Samaj fans is the following video.

In it Dhunda was arguing that Sri Anandpur Sahib as the birthplace of the Khalsa Panth should hold more importance to Sikhs than yatra's and that Vaisakhi 1699 is absolutely central to what Dhan Dhan Guru Gobind Singh Ji Maharaj's life history means to the Khalsa Panth (as opposed to the Dusht Daman theory supposedly in a previous life).

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wm8gxroldjA

So I think we should accord all our fellow Sikhs respect regardless of if Sri Anandpur Sahib is more resonant to them or if they prefer to go on yatra's, as we need to be mature enough to "agree to disagree" respectfully on such issues.

Dhunda Did His False Translation of Bachittar Natak.... Mahakaal Kaal Ka Aradi...

Sant Jarnail Singh Ji Khalsa Bhindranwale Did Also... Which Contradicted Dhunda's And Explained that people are doing false translation...

(There is Audio Available I can Link)

Who will you listen to....

Sant Baba Jarnail Singh Ji Khalsa Bhindranwale.

Or

Sarbjit Singh Dhunda.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

No one is saying A Mortal Is Greater Than the Guru. Nor anything else of the Sort.



My point is.

Sant Jarnail Singh Ji was a Sant. Just look at how much Kamai They Have.

So their Word is Obviously going to carry more weight than just a random parcharak that is already known for wrong views.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
 Share


  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • yeh it's true, we shouldn't be lazy and need to learn jhatka shikaar. It doesn't help some of grew up in surrounding areas like Slough and Southall where everyone thought it was super bad for amrit dharis to eat meat, and they were following Sant babas and jathas, and instead the Singhs should have been normalising jhatka just like the recent world war soldiers did. We are trying to rectifiy this and khalsa should learn jhatka.  But I am just writing about bhog for those that are still learning rehit. As I explained, there are all these negative influences in the panth that talk against rehit, but this shouldn't deter us from taking khanda pahul, no matter what level of rehit we are!
    • How is it going to help? The link is of a Sikh hunter. Fine, but what good does that do the lazy Sikh who ate khulla maas in a restaurant? By the way, for the OP, yes, it's against rehit to eat khulla maas.
    • Yeah, Sikhs should do bhog of food they eat. But the point of bhog is to only do bhog of food which is fit to be presented to Maharaj. It's not maryada to do bhog of khulla maas and pretend it's OK to eat. It's not. Come on, bro, you should know better than to bring this Sakhi into it. Is this Sikh in the restaurant accompanied by Guru Gobind Singh ji? Is he fighting a dharam yudh? Or is he merely filling his belly with the nearest restaurant?  Please don't make a mockery of our puratan Singhs' sacrifices by comparing them to lazy Sikhs who eat khulla maas.
    • Seriously?? The Dhadi is trying to be cute. For those who didn't get it, he said: "Some say Maharaj killed bakras (goats). Some say he cut the heads of the Panj Piyaras. The truth is that they weren't goats. It was she-goats (ਬਕਰੀਆਂ). He jhatka'd she-goats. Not he-goats." Wow. This is possibly the stupidest thing I've ever heard in relation to Sikhi.
    • Instead of a 9 inch or larger kirpan, take a smaller kirpan and put it (without gatra) inside your smaller turban and tie the turban tightly. This keeps a kirpan on your person without interfering with the massage or alarming the masseuse. I'm not talking about a trinket but rather an actual small kirpan that fits in a sheath (you'll have to search to find one). As for ahem, "problems", you could get a male masseuse. I don't know where you are, but in most places there are professional masseuses who actually know what they are doing and can really relieve your muscle pains.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use