Jump to content

Patshahi 10 ? Urgent.


Recommended Posts

PS: Cristians do not believe in reincarnation but in the bible it sort of talks about it(ill put up the tuk from the bible when I find it)... These types of things have been cut or added to please people's individual mindsets.. For example in the original bible there was no chapter of Romans. The Romans put that chapter in so people won't start disobeying the roman law... They were trying to make themselves look like the authority of god..

You should understand from where I'm coming from...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

For singh veer ji ...see.my earlier post starting with " my query...."

For sukhjit ... mohalla10 was in SGGS...it is still there as dohra....

Also jesus christ was avatar or not ..... he.can be or cant be ....But what mtters is mukti...the ultimate goal....

Now ask urself who cn make u mukt...

If there's mohalla 10 written by haridas ji then i think patshahi 10 written in dasam bani can aswell be right...

& remember there's no iota of doubt for me about dasam bani!

sri akaal sahai!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Try to find answer of this question in Bani. Gurbani States:

Patshah: ਜਿਸ ਨੋ ਬਖਸੇ ਸਿਫਤਿ ਸਾਲਾਹ ॥ ਨਾਨਕ ਪਾਤਿਸਾਹੀ ਪਾਤਿਸਾਹੁ ॥੨੫॥ (Jis No Bakshe Sifti Salah, Nanak Patsaahi Paatsaah)
Mahalla: ਨਿਜ ਘਰਿ ਮਹਲੁ ਪਾਵਹੁ ਸੁਖ ਸਹਜੇ ਬਹੁਰਿ ਨ ਹੋਇਗੋ ਫੇਰਾ ॥੩॥ (Nij Ghar Mahal Pavho Sukh Sehje Bahur Na Hoyego Fera - P: 13) ਤਾ ਮਨੁ ਖੀਵਾ ਜਾਣੀਐ ਜਾ ਮਹਲੀ ਪਾਏ ਥਾਉ ॥੨॥ (Ta Mann Khiva Jaaniye Ja Mehali Paae Thaao - P:16)

There are many lines which explains that Nij Ghar = Nirankar ka Des is Mahal and dweller of same is Mahalla.

As per Gurmat Philosophy there is no difference between Mahalla and Patshah.

And also we need to concentrate that it is Patshahi 10 which automatically makes first 9 Gur's Patshah. So this logic will not work that Gur Gobind Singh had some Ego problem.

ਜਿਸ ਨੋ ਬਖਸੇ ਸਿਫਤਿ ਸਾਲਾਹ ॥ ਨਾਨਕ ਪਾਤਿਸਾਹੀ ਪਾਤਿਸਾਹੁ ॥੨੫॥ (Jis No Bakshe Sifti Salah, Nanak Patsaahi Paatsaah)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Try to find answer of this question in Bani. Gurbani States:

Patshah: ਜਿਸ ਨੋ ਬਖਸੇ ਸਿਫਤਿ ਸਾਲਾਹ ॥ ਨਾਨਕ ਪਾਤਿਸਾਹੀ ਪਾਤਿਸਾਹੁ ॥੨੫॥

Mahalla: ਨਿਜ ਘਰਿ ਮਹਲੁ ਪਾਵਹੁ ਸੁਖ ਸਹਜੇ ਬਹੁਰਿ ਨ ਹੋਇਗੋ ਫੇਰਾ ॥੩॥ (P: 13) ਤਾ ਮਨੁ ਖੀਵਾ ਜਾਣੀਐ ਜਾ ਮਹਲੀ ਪਾਏ ਥਾਉ ॥੨॥ (P:16)

There are many lines which explains that Nij Ghar = Nirankar ka Des is Mahal and dweller of same is Mahalla.

As per Gurmat Philosophy there is no difference between Mahalla and Patshah.

And also we need to concentrate that it is Patshahi 10 which automatically makes first 9 Gur's Patshah. So this logic will not work that Gur Gobind Singh had some Ego problem.

ਜਿਸ ਨੋ ਬਖਸੇ ਸਿਫਤਿ ਸਾਲਾਹ ॥ ਨਾਨਕ ਪਾਤਿਸਾਹੀ ਪਾਤਿਸਾਹੁ ॥੨੫॥

Thank u.. although i cant see punjabi font ... but voila!!!

Things u said are correct...i also had thought of it...

thanks...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Jesus had a kripan? I don't think he was a Sikh at all. I think the Vegetarian one is right ;) I can show you lines, where it says that people who are vegetarian are supreme, and God is thoroughly impressed by them. If Jesus can't impress God, how is he pavitr. So what if he kept his hair/pagg.. so many people kept there hair/pagg at that time, so many yogi babas keep there hair/pagg right now too, but it doesn't mean anything really since hair/pagg doesn't exactly mean enlightenment for everyone. Can you link me to Kalghidar Chamtkar? I'd like to read what that is before I say anything.

Yes he did carry a kirpan and so did all of his followers...

Read this article and now YOU make up your mind if jesus was a vegetarian

http://www.suprememastertv.com/ve/?wr_id=97&page=3&phoneoffset=0&url=link1_0&goto_url=m2

You are so narrow minded its not even funny. Please do not disrespect jesus or any avatars for that matter. Only the guru who is infallible can criticize and say anything about any avatars.

http://jsks.biz/sri-kalgidhar-chamatkar

This is kalgidhar chamatkar

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Jesus had a kripan? I don't think he was a Sikh at all. I think the Vegetarian one is right ;) I can show you lines, where it says that people who are vegetarian are supreme, and God is thoroughly impressed by them. If Jesus can't impress God, how is he pavitr. So what if he kept his hair/pagg.. so many people kept there hair/pagg at that time, so many yogi babas keep there hair/pagg right now too, but it doesn't mean anything really since hair/pagg doesn't exactly mean enlightenment for everyone. Can you link me to Kalghidar Chamtkar? I'd like to read what that is before I say anything.

so those lines means that whosoever is a veggie is supreme & god is impressed...haha..good joke...

our deeds etc. matters....

bhul chuk muaf

sri akal ji sahai!

AKAAL! AKAAL! AKAAL! AKAAL! AKAAL! AKAAL!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I bet you would have a heart attack Preet if you read sau sakhi... In it guru gobind Singh Ji ate a lion if I read correctly... I could be wrong so don't quote me...

If the guru wanted to jhatka a bakra and way it i have no problem whatsoever cause he is supreme even if he eats meat or not. It's the will of akaal purkh..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't put my guru in a box and say he can ONLY do certain things and he can't do anything else... For example in sikhi we aren't allowed to wear jewelry but guru Ji had pearls diamonds rings etc...

Jesus had a brother named James and he said 'that in the heavens there is no arguments about flesh but in my opinion we should be vegetarians.'

PS these are not the exact words of his so don't quote me..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yeah, and eating vegetarian is a 'deed', incase you didn't know.

I don't care if our Sri Guru ji ate a lion. I know for a fact that eating meat is paapi. Besides, if our Sri Guru Sahib jhatka'd any animal, he gives the animal mukti, while we foolish human beings can't give mukti to anyone (even if we jhatka). As for jewelry, that's a totally different issue. I don't wear jewelry, but I have jewelry, and I don't think it's that bad. Look at Sri Vishnu for example, he wore jewelry yet he is that satguru of satyug. So it can't be that bad.

Singhs also did jhatka contrary to popular belief that they ate sholey when they were in the jungles.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

ਖੇਲੈਂ ਨਿੱਤ ਸ਼ਿਕਾਰ ਬਨਨ ਮੈਂ, ਮਾਰਿ ਮ੍ਰਿਗ ਬਹੁ ਖਾਵੈਂ ।

Always partake in hunting, [practice] killing deer and then eat your hunt.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
 Share


  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • yeh it's true, we shouldn't be lazy and need to learn jhatka shikaar. It doesn't help some of grew up in surrounding areas like Slough and Southall where everyone thought it was super bad for amrit dharis to eat meat, and they were following Sant babas and jathas, and instead the Singhs should have been normalising jhatka just like the recent world war soldiers did. We are trying to rectifiy this and khalsa should learn jhatka.  But I am just writing about bhog for those that are still learning rehit. As I explained, there are all these negative influences in the panth that talk against rehit, but this shouldn't deter us from taking khanda pahul, no matter what level of rehit we are!
    • How is it going to help? The link is of a Sikh hunter. Fine, but what good does that do the lazy Sikh who ate khulla maas in a restaurant? By the way, for the OP, yes, it's against rehit to eat khulla maas.
    • Yeah, Sikhs should do bhog of food they eat. But the point of bhog is to only do bhog of food which is fit to be presented to Maharaj. It's not maryada to do bhog of khulla maas and pretend it's OK to eat. It's not. Come on, bro, you should know better than to bring this Sakhi into it. Is this Sikh in the restaurant accompanied by Guru Gobind Singh ji? Is he fighting a dharam yudh? Or is he merely filling his belly with the nearest restaurant?  Please don't make a mockery of our puratan Singhs' sacrifices by comparing them to lazy Sikhs who eat khulla maas.
    • Seriously?? The Dhadi is trying to be cute. For those who didn't get it, he said: "Some say Maharaj killed bakras (goats). Some say he cut the heads of the Panj Piyaras. The truth is that they weren't goats. It was she-goats (ਬਕਰੀਆਂ). He jhatka'd she-goats. Not he-goats." Wow. This is possibly the stupidest thing I've ever heard in relation to Sikhi.
    • Instead of a 9 inch or larger kirpan, take a smaller kirpan and put it (without gatra) inside your smaller turban and tie the turban tightly. This keeps a kirpan on your person without interfering with the massage or alarming the masseuse. I'm not talking about a trinket but rather an actual small kirpan that fits in a sheath (you'll have to search to find one). As for ahem, "problems", you could get a male masseuse. I don't know where you are, but in most places there are professional masseuses who actually know what they are doing and can really relieve your muscle pains.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use