Jump to content
Sign in to follow this  
hsingh8963

Nanak Shah Fakir Needs To Be Banned

Recommended Posts

We all know of this upcoming film...

Much beadi needs to be Banned. Big Hindi singers and actors supporting it.

Damdami Taksal - Movie needs to be Banned.

Please do not ignore this film is already being showcased at events.

https://m.facebook.com/story.php?story_fbid=966602766691718&id=100000260125217&notif_t=like&ref=m_notif

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I agree. A moving depiction of our Guru’s is wrong. We’ve always known this. It is beyond me why the Director would allow this to happen.

That’s the reason Chaar Sahibzaade was received so well, it was respectful.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I think part of the blame lies with our tribal jathedars and their PA's. They lack leadership skills and foresight, and as a result make poor decisions which have far reaching consequences for the Panth. There's a letter being shared on Facebook which is apparently from the PA of Giani Gurbachan Singh. The PA appears to give permission and approval on behalf of the jathedars for 'Nanak Shah Fakir.'

If they had done their maths and objected to the film at the start then perhaps the damage could have been averted?

Instead we are left with protesting against a film which is due to be released imminently, 'with the blessings of Sri Akal Takht.'

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I think part of the blame lies with our tribal jathedars and their PA's. They lack leadership skills and foresight, and as a result make poor decisions which have far reaching consequences for the Panth. There's a letter being shared on Facebook which is apparently from the PA of Giani Gurbachan Singh. The PA appears to give permission and approval on behalf of the jathedars for 'Nanak Shah Fakir.'

If they had done their maths and objected to the film at the start then perhaps the damage could have been averted?

Instead we are left with protesting against a film which is due to be released imminently, 'with the blessings of Sri Akal Takht.'

It was said that they said there would be ONLY animation used and no human portrayal, the thumbs up was given and they went and did what they've done.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Michael Singh questioning if Guru Nanak wore a turban. Lolz go back to making mainstream hollywood movies. In case he needs to read what GGS says about bald men like himself.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

....

And he has a valid point. We allow artists to paint their impressions and we all happily accept and appreciate their paintings, heck even worship the paintings. So hindufied. Yet we have an issue with this film. we cant be for and against the same thing. They are both depictions of our guru. And theyre both wrong.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest Jacfsing2

We all know of this upcoming film...

Much beadi needs to be Banned. Big Hindi singers and actors supporting it.

Damdami Taksal - Movie needs to be Banned.

Please do not ignore this film is already being showcased at events.

https://m.facebook.com/story.php?story_fbid=966602766691718&id=100000260125217&notif_t=like&ref=m_notif

do you think BJP will really ban a movie anti-Sikh?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Well before banning anything a body of Sikh scholars and political representatives should view the whole film and mark out scenes they object to so that they can be removed. Making Sikh oriented films and telling stories of the Guru's and Sikh hero' is very important in this day and age. As long as the films are respectful and show the true message of Guru's and help inspire non-sikhs to embrace Sikh teachings then even better.

  • Like 3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

And he has a valid point. We allow artists to paint their impressions and we all happily accept and appreciate their paintings, heck even worship the paintings. So hindufied. Yet we have an issue with this film. we cant be for and against the same thing. They are both depictions of our guru. And theyre both wrong.

The gurus supported artwork and painting when
  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
Sign in to follow this  



  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Please don't use this "if you are bless to have a daughter" because this is putting women on a pedestal.  The reality is that there are truths whether you like them or not. I would not like my daughter to dump some decent hard working guy for a richer guy just because he had more money and getting a higher status. But I know that when my daughter gets married she will look into how much the guy makes, what profession he is in, will her status increase, does he have his own house, does he make more than her.  Please don't say this particular feature does not exist in a women's nature. Just because you may not act upon it does not mean it doesn't exist. I could bring you example after example said out of woman's mouth and her actions that someone can connect the dots. There a truths (unflattering) about men's nature which I don't find it offensive. Now should I say "I would should be blessed to have a son". Here is a reality about men's nature. There is part of men's nature that if a man could he would have unlimited sexual access to as many women as possible. The reality is that this is not possible for the majority of men. 90 per cent of men at least this is impossible.  Here is another uncomfortable  reality,  you have more female ancestors than male ancestors and you know why?  Because throughout human history, human's were never monogamous. 80 percent of men never bred with women because 20 percent of the top tier had access to all the women. Women sexually selected top tier men to have kids with. They shared their men with other women and they preferred that to having a low status man. That is how the institution of marriage came about with one woman to one man. There are truths about muslims nature which on another thread which a muslim probably finds offensive. We don't bat an eyelid because we know it is the truth. It is 2020, equality does not mean putting women on a pedestal. You want privilege. You are also displaying a behaviour as well that my bhuas directly from their mouths have told me which is unflattering about women and that is they never like to admit to their foibles. 
    • What is with the muslim obsession with debates? They have so many uncomfortable flaws in their faith they literally need to be a lawyer to constantly defend it. It explains a lot about their general aggressive attitude. Even this muslim neighbour, doesn't answer a straight question, keeps deflecting and targeting jvk.
    • I had darshan of sant ji when I was a child. He was my baba ji's friend. 
    • You gave me an idea. Why don't you get mullahs to give speeches in mosques about the 'wrongness' of pedophilia and grooming rapist gangs? That might help deal with the problem in your community!  Or is that acceptable behaviour in your faith?   
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use