Jump to content

Uk Pm David Cameron Khalistani


Recommended Posts

Why would you want to vote for them?

He is clearly just doing it for the votes, yet some of us are getting so excited that he visited a Gurdwara.

Are some Conservative policies really something a Sikh should vote for? Tax cuts for the rich, massive public spending cuts, their involvement in Operation Bluestar and the massacre of Sikhs, passing "terrorism" laws which have the aim of restricting freedom, I could go on, but ask yourself, is this really a party a Sikh should support?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This article sums it up:

http://dailysikhupdates.com/uk-pm-desperate-for-sikh-vote-but-no-stand-on-sikh-manifesto/

So basically David Cameron and Ed Miliband both recently visit Gurdwaras as a political stunt to try and attract the Sikh vote. Only the most gullible a and uneducated will fail to see that all this is a election time stunt. Neither Labour or Conservative parties have even mentioned the Sikh Manifesto yet alone pledge support for it.

Do not waste you votes voting for any political party unless they publicly and openly pledge support for the Sikh Manifesto.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This article sums it up:

http://dailysikhupdates.com/uk-pm-desperate-for-sikh-vote-but-no-stand-on-sikh-manifesto/

So basically David Cameron and Ed Miliband both recently visit Gurdwaras as a political stunt to try and attract the Sikh vote. Only the most gullible a and uneducated will fail to see that all this is a election time stunt. Neither Labour or Conservative parties have even mentioned the Sikh Manifesto yet alone pledge support for it.

Do not waste you votes voting for any political party unless they publicly and openly pledge support for the Sikh Manifesto.

Unfortunately photo opportunities with the PM is all that matters for some, so that they can impress their relatives and friends on Facebook.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So basically David Cameron and Ed Miliband both recently visit Gurdwaras as a political stunt to try and attract the Sikh vote

No, how can that "BASICALLY" be it ?

Basically, at election time, every political party does election stunts to try and win votes. Thats the western democracy model. No surprises there then. Basically then, the issue is the way each party behaved towards we Sikhs during these vote winning political stunts. One of the parties behaved in such a sordid way towards us as human beings we would basically be stupid for ignoring it. One of the parties saw us, with our beards and dastars, as too ugly, too animal like, too foreign, to even be photographed standing next to and so banned all media and photographs so that no one would ever know they came to visit hideous disease ridden creatures like us. Surely then that should basically be the real issue here ?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Forget it Jagsaw.

This forum is incapable of understanding that the Tories have:

(1) Pledged a Sikh Regiment

(2) Shown interest in Sikhs by visiting the Harmandir Sahib and Jalianwala Bagh. Labour has never bothered -only trade deals.

(3) Recognised the three basic core principles of Sikhi - kirat karna, wand ke chakna, naam japna - and stated so publicly

(4) Invited Sikhs to Downing St on Vaisakhi, kirtan at Downing St

(5) Celebrated Vaisakhi in the Houses of Parliament

(6) Supported the creation of Sikh free schools - the only party to do so. This aspect is an integral part of the Sikh manifesto. Labour are against free schools.

(7) Passed legislation to close a loop hole in allowing turbans to be worn in the workplace.

(8) Attended a nagar kirtan and gurdwara in full view of the worlds media - no barring of worshippers unlike Labour. Infact, the total opposite occurred. Mingled with 15,000.

(9) Scrapped turban searches at airports, a legislation that the EU will seek to look upon as a model for their respective member states

(10) Released several video's in praise of Sikhs, their contribution to British society and the economy.

Has Labour supported Sikhs specifically on the above points?

I rest my case.

The aspect of Sikh schools is part of the Sikh manifesto - this aspect of the Sikh manifesto is supported by the Tories.

To think outside of the "Sikh box" for a minute, if every community produced a manifesto i.e. Hindu manifesto, Sikh manifesto, Jewish manifesto, Muslim manifesto, Atheist manifesto etc....the government will not be able to govern! When we elect a government it has a mandate to govern for all the British isles and it's peoples. It will will please some but not all - that goes for all governments. No government will keep everyone happy.

To read some of the views on this thread, it's as if some are not familiar with a western democracy!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
 Share


  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • yeh it's true, we shouldn't be lazy and need to learn jhatka shikaar. It doesn't help some of grew up in surrounding areas like Slough and Southall where everyone thought it was super bad for amrit dharis to eat meat, and they were following Sant babas and jathas, and instead the Singhs should have been normalising jhatka just like the recent world war soldiers did. We are trying to rectifiy this and khalsa should learn jhatka.  But I am just writing about bhog for those that are still learning rehit. As I explained, there are all these negative influences in the panth that talk against rehit, but this shouldn't deter us from taking khanda pahul, no matter what level of rehit we are!
    • How is it going to help? The link is of a Sikh hunter. Fine, but what good does that do the lazy Sikh who ate khulla maas in a restaurant? By the way, for the OP, yes, it's against rehit to eat khulla maas.
    • Yeah, Sikhs should do bhog of food they eat. But the point of bhog is to only do bhog of food which is fit to be presented to Maharaj. It's not maryada to do bhog of khulla maas and pretend it's OK to eat. It's not. Come on, bro, you should know better than to bring this Sakhi into it. Is this Sikh in the restaurant accompanied by Guru Gobind Singh ji? Is he fighting a dharam yudh? Or is he merely filling his belly with the nearest restaurant?  Please don't make a mockery of our puratan Singhs' sacrifices by comparing them to lazy Sikhs who eat khulla maas.
    • Seriously?? The Dhadi is trying to be cute. For those who didn't get it, he said: "Some say Maharaj killed bakras (goats). Some say he cut the heads of the Panj Piyaras. The truth is that they weren't goats. It was she-goats (ਬਕਰੀਆਂ). He jhatka'd she-goats. Not he-goats." Wow. This is possibly the stupidest thing I've ever heard in relation to Sikhi.
    • Instead of a 9 inch or larger kirpan, take a smaller kirpan and put it (without gatra) inside your smaller turban and tie the turban tightly. This keeps a kirpan on your person without interfering with the massage or alarming the masseuse. I'm not talking about a trinket but rather an actual small kirpan that fits in a sheath (you'll have to search to find one). As for ahem, "problems", you could get a male masseuse. I don't know where you are, but in most places there are professional masseuses who actually know what they are doing and can really relieve your muscle pains.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use